Gandhi Economic And Moral Progress Analysis

Superior Essays
The great Reverend William Lawrence of Massachusetts once said, “there is a certain distrust on the part of our people as to the effect of material prosperity on their morality.” In Mohandas Gandhi’s speech, “Economic and Moral Progress,” Gandhi’s focal point is differentiating between the monetary growth of society and the chastity that one embodies. Throughout the course of time, mankind has proceeded to tie itself to the concept that our progression and prosperity as human beings in the field of economics and fiscal matters are pivotal for maintaining and living in a flourishing and thriving society. Gandhi juxtaposes an individual’s lifestyle choices with our grasp of how far morality extends within our lives. These two unparalleled …show more content…
When visiting South Africa, Gandhi made several discoveries in regards to this matter. He discovered that the people of South Africa blatantly believe that the more money they had, the more selfish with their money they are and not sharing your wealth and living a flashy lifestyle reveals your selfishness. Gandhi’s greatest influence Alfred Russel Wallace, was on the forefront teaching about the connection between economic and moral progress prior to Gandhi picking up where he left off. Gandhi quotes Wallace by remarking, “…we shall show more truth than gold, greater fearlessness than pomp of power and wealth, greater charity than love of self” (565). Wallace expresses that with the rise of power and wealth, the morality of people has diminished. Wallace stresses the importance of prioritizing morals over wealth. Martin Luther King Jr. chimes in on the teachings of Gandhi by saying, “Mahatma Gandhi embodied in his life certain universal principles that are inherent in the moral structure of the universe, and these principles are as inescapable as the law of gravitation.” King refers to the principles of morality as taught by Gandhi as they are inevitable and unable to avoid, just as the laws of gravity cannot be bended and defined differently than the world allows us

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What duty do we have to help those who might otherwise starve without our intervention? Is it our responsibility to help our fellow man in need or are we free to stand on the sidelines? Philosophers Jan Narveson and Peter Singer offer contrasting viewpoints on the moral obligations affluent nations have to aid and support the poor. Where Singer reasons that by having the privilege of living in nations of wealth, this benefit carries with it the moral obligation to help those around the world who are sentenced to live in absolute poverty, if only because of where fate had them born. In response, Narveson argues Singer is mistaken: our responsibility and duty first lies to our circle and we should never insist that others take the responsibility…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gandhi 210 Final Paper

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages

    1. Before Humanities 210, how would you have described the philosophies/religions that influenced your processes for decision making, thinking, and developing preferences? How would you describe your level of conscious choice of and commitment to these philosophies/religions? What helped form or develop the belief in that philosophy/religion? Answer: Growing up, I always went to a Christian church and my parents raised me with Christian values.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I present Jan Narvesonʻs argument that no one should be morally required to assist those who are impoverished or starving. I will then object to this statement by arguing that those who are financially secure who are able to maintain comfortable lifestyles are morally obligated to distribute a portion of their wealth or excess food and supplies to those in need. My objection consists of two main arguments, the first being that those who are financially secure may be responsible for the impoverishment of others as a result of their consumption habits. The second component of my objection is that people should be morally obligated to distribute any excess money, food, or supplies they feel that they are able to because it would…

    • 2077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “There is a sufficiency in the world for man’s need but not for man’s greed” ~Mahatma Gandhi. Take a glance at the world around us, our society now consists of grounds of greed and avarice. Individuals have other dreams regarding social life, money and aesthetics rather than focusing on relationships, respect, reputation and trust. The world can’t provide any more than our necessities: nature, food, fresh water and oxygen, yet people ask for more.…

    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Declaration of Independence says that “all men are created equal,” but where does this apply to women? Women are considered inferior to the male race; it has always been that way. Not only do they receive fewer opportunities than a man, but even their payroll has been affected because of this. In 1963 John F. Kennedy signed the Equal Pay Act of 1963. This act requires that both male and female employees must be given equal pay for work or you are breaking the law.…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, if we as humans know we are accountable to God for our character in terms of honesty, love faithfulness caring, kindness, we will all take it seriously and put more focus on these virtues rather than accumulating wealth because there is justice for all. Brooks concept of conscience leap means leaving behind all the material skills and wealth, acquired and stepping into another world which is focus on morals and helping the community in a positive…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Carnegie, a self made millionaire stated “the man who dies thus rich dies disgrace” (Carnegie). The inspiration came from his belief that men like him held a great responsibility to contribute their wealth for the good of mankind. In his essay “The Gospel of Wealth” he emphasizes on how millionaires should spread their wealth even by leaving a positive impact in the world. However his main concern is how wealthy man should contribute to society when they’re alive.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Writing in November 1971, Peter Singer condemns developed nations for not making the necessary decisions to save East Bengalis from evitable starvation, violence, and disease. Even the most prominent aid contributors such as Britain and Australia spend much more on domestic luxury projects than on reducing fellow human suffering. Using Bengal as an example, Singer asserts that people have a moral obligation to give significant amounts of money to aid organizations. In disagreement, I will argue that we also have a right to keep our earnings because we have entitlements in terms of autonomy. While giving significant amounts of money to charity may be a morally positive act, it is not a moral obligation.…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyday millions of people around the world suffer in circumstances, in which they could die from lack of proper care and resources. In Famine, Affluence, and Morality, Peter Singer acknowledges this issue facing humanity and argues for the moral obligation to give large amounts of money to those in need. Singer believes that all who are able should be giving up many, if not all of their luxuries to help give the less fortunate their necessities. I will begin by summarizing the argument that Singer dictates in his article and then explain my reasoning for believing his notions to be sound and valid.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer discusses the moral obligation of humans to prevent bad things from happening. In particular, Singer focuses on the prevention of the famine in East Bengal during November 1971 where many people were dying from poverty. Singer argues that since global poverty may be inhibited through charitable donations, then individual people ought to be morally obligated to donate what Singer defines as their surplus of money to charities that will aid impoverished nations. Singer writes his article in the format of a thought experiment, in which he presents a number of generally agreeable premises that lead up to his conclusion which is to donate as much money to charity as what Singer determines is reasonable.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gospel Of Wealth Analysis

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Each essay presented in the chapter six conversation section expresses a perspective on what each individual's responsibility is to their community. Out of the seven beliefs presented, I find the idea that the rich should give their wealth to those in need the most compelling. In certain circumstances, those less fortunate need as much help as they can get. It’s a strange idea to think that there’s people who have billions of dollars in their bank account while there are still undeveloped countries where children are starving to death. They struggle to find clean water and food.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our society faces a lot of challenges despite living in such a liberal world. We like to limit the activities we are not okay with or don’t understand, so in terms we label them as wrong or even outlaw them. We don’t like to experiment new ways of life, because we are often too comfortable living in our own shell of what is good and what is not. Anything outside of it is considered to be erroneous. John Stuart Mill stresses on the issue of conscience and individuality.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gandhi statement supports what I just stated in the sense that anyone would feel better about something when earn it rather than when it is just handed to them like a…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most original contributions of Gandhiji in the area of economics is the concept of trusteeship. Gandhiji wanted complete equality in so far as the basic needs of the people were concerned. In fact he wanted the basic needs of all including animals to be met satisfactorily. But at the same time, he wanted people to have incentives to remain economically active and produce more. This naturally would lead to some people having more than what they need.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the world we live in now, almost everything is based on your social class and socioeconomic status. Whether it’s your salary, your friends, we could even go as far as saying it changes how other people view you as a person. All of this is based on morals. Morality is more important than money in society because, without morals, total chaos would occur. Though money is a huge part of everyday life and our system, for that matter, without morals, we won't be able to keep a functioning economic system at all because it would lead to corruption.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays