Compatibilism Vs Libertarianism

Superior Essays
James W. Lichtenberg says “There are two views on human behaviour… either human behaviour is caused from without or it is caused from within” ( Throughout history free will has been debated by average people, Christians, non Christians and philosophers. There are conflicting views on the matter of free will some say free will does not exist because our life has been predetermined while others believe free will does exist and we are able to be in control over our decisions and actions. There is both a libertarian view and a compatibilist view. In this essay I will look at the question “Should Christians think humans have free will or not?” I will argue Christians do have free will because humans have the ability to make there own choices, the …show more content…
Calvin proposed two different forms of describing the human will (both of them considered to be self-determined). They are the libertarian free will and the predetermined will. A libertarian free will “which is self determined implies the real existence of an unlimited range of possibilities or an action (either in positive or negative terms)” (Mattei p.125). Libertarianism holds to a concept of “free will” that requires the individual to be able to take more than one possible course of action under a given set of circumstances. Furthermore, libertarianism argues that free will is logically opposed with a deterministic view of the world and that humans must have free will in order to be responsible for their actions. The view of a predetermined free will arms the existence of an entity called human will, but denies that it is “free” in the sense that it has an unlimited range of …show more content…
Our fate, or the way our life turns out, is the outcome of which ones we make. J. L. Schellenberg writes about Christians differing views on the matter of free will and says
“If finite persons lacked free will, their responses to God would be 'fixed' in advance, and thus mechanical and lacking in spontaneity. Indeed, the relationship between themselves and God would be like that between a hypnotized patient and the hypnotist, or between a puppet and the puppeteer, or between a robot and its designer - which is to say grounded in one-sided manipulation and control, and so not authentic or truly person”
I agree with the libertarian view of free will. I do not believe God put us on earth to just control our every move humans make. God was and is not a puppet master. I believe we were put on earth to make our own choices on whether or not to follow God. I believe God knows in the end what we choose but I do not believe he makes that choice for us. I believe that because humans and Christians have free will we are able to be in control of our actions. We sin because we have the ability to perform actions God does not approve of. Therefore humans choices and actions can not be

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Charles Arthur Campbell was a philosopher who defended the Libertarian view of free will. While he was a believer in free will, he also left room for determinism because he believed that determinism does not go against the correct view of free will. He believed that in order for an act to be free, the agent must be the sole author of the act. If one is subjected to the influence of past events or a set of events one’s action is not free because if other entities other than the agent had influence upon the given act then that act can no longer be deemed morally correlated to the agent. One must also have a real sense that one could have done otherwise in order to be compatible with the view that one event does not lead to another.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reconciliation of moral responsibility and freewill allows us to understand how having freewill forces humans to believe that their behaviors and doings are morally responsible because their actions are caused naturally and or are determined. The question here is what is free will? Historically speaking, it is the action of acting freely; meaning everything is done causally due to the person. Free will and moral responsibility go hand in hand, but the issue is can a person really be in control of these things they had no control over? The problem with free will is that we believe determinism is true, but also that we are morally responsible; meaning we are held responsible for the actions we choose.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The issue I will address in this paper is known as “compatibilism.” By definition, compatibilism is the idea that determinism is true, every event in the world is caused, and that free will still exist. I will explore Walter Terrence Stace’s version of compatibilism, explaining why he thinks learned professors of philosophy and psychology incorrectly define free will by confusing the meaning of the words. I will assess Stace’s argument; that indeterminism is not what it is meant by the phrase “free will.” Freedom is compatible with causal determinism because free will can be determined by the psychological states of an individual and the effects of physical forces or conditions upon that individual.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marisa Paris Humanities 220 Professor Cope 11/17/14 One of the benefits of comparing multiple different pieces of work is the ability it gives us to form our own opinions. Although the pieces of work may be from varying time periods, or unchanged time periods, each of them still include certain aspects that are virtually the same. For example, The Gospel of Luke, Paul’s Letter to the Romans, and Augustine’s Confessions, all present alike views on the idea of free will. A loose definition of free will could serve as follows: the capability to perform activities and make choices in which neither God nor fate controls either of them. This immaterial definition of free will is given life and unveiled in The Gospel of Luke, Paul’s letter to the Romans, and Augustine’s Confessions.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For centuries philosophers have been debating the concepts of free will and whether it exists or it’s a mere illusion. Over the years, many different theories have been hindering the answer behind this complex concept. Many different philosophers discuss different ideals such as compatibilism and determinism. Both the combatalist and the hard determinist feel there's no escaping fate, however there differences lies on one major concept — free will. Even though an individual's fate may remain fixed, the compatibilist view concludes that humans still possess free will.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans do not have free will. Humans can not make a conscious decision without it being affected by their past experiences, or the beliefs they were taught at a young age. Humans strive towards the idea of being able to make their own decisions and set their own path in life, but in the end, everything you do, is a product of past events. People want free will because we want to be unique. The idea of making your own decisions and being able to separate yourself from everyone else is what some people base their lives around.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In my argument, I am going to support Strawson’s claims and argue against Libertarians that it is not possible to be truly morally responsible for one’s actions even with this idea of indeterminacy. Libertarians specifically believe that our free will allows us to have true moral responsibility. In order to fully understand Strawson’s views and the views of those that counter him, we must revisit what his basic argument is. As human beings, we make specific choices and carry out actions the way we do because of our character or personality or motivational structures (CPM).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The True Puppeteer What is free will? Is it a false belief or an idea of human actions? Paul Halbach believes that human beings do not have ‘free will’, because he is a determinist. A determinist believes that all human choices, events, actions, and reactions are all already determined.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cahn's Argument Analysis

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The idea of moral responsibility is argued between determinists and libertarians, with the division being caused by the possibility of free will. Steven Cahn offers an explanation of the different views of free will with the three opinions being hard determinism, soft determinism, and libertarianism. In this writing, I am going to explain Cahn’s viewpoint, and his idea that freedom is not compatible with determinism. The setting for this argument begins with a criminal trial from the early twentieth century.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America, land of the free and home of the brave. We pride ourselves on being unrestricted, we can choose: what we believe (spiritually and politically), what we want to be (career-wise and gender-wise), and where we want to go. But, what does it mean to truly be free? According to the Merriam-Webster the definition of free is, “not determined by anything beyond its own nature or being : choosing or capable of choosing for itself.” In other words, nothing controls people but them people themselves.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout centuries the theory whether predestination interrupts freewill has been an ongoing argument for centuries in the Christian church. When it comes to defending this argument many believers, in response tend to agree with the predestination theory by one of the great theologians I have had the pleasure of learning about throughout this semester, by the name of John Calvin. In this paper I will discuss the theory in question that focuses around “predestination” and determine whether or not it truly does “interrupt free will.” As I engage this theory I will present evidence from my investigation that supports the theory of predestination and give my view on how it should apply to Christians today. When it comes to the argument of predestination…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction I. In this paper, I will be arguing for the following claim that we, human beings are not predetermined beings, but rather we have free will. It has long been argued that people are not free and do not have free will; that rather than having free will we live in a world that is predetermined. That our choices and actions are reflections of and happen because of a long line of other choices and action that caused the present, and thus we have a fixed future. This is just not the case.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Mind Body Problem

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Philosophy, there is the well known concept of the mind-body problem. The mind-body problem explains how mental states such as beliefs, actions, and thinking are related to physical states of an individual (Stewart, p.137, 2012). The basic issue of the mind body problem is the understanding how a body can have a mind inside of it that is controlling it. A frequent question asked is are we only matter or are we matter and mind? There are four philosophical positions including; type identity theory physicalism, functionalist physicalism, property dualism, and substance dualism that have different approaches to the concept of the mind-body problem.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There has been many different theories about the topic of Free will. For instance, does free will even truly exist, is it defined by our own religious beliefs or is it simply brought on by cause and effect. Free will is nothing more than our own personal freedom to make choices in our lives. It can be brought on by an urge or naturally carefree feeling, to be able to choose with out the interference or opinions of others. A free course of action driven by our own means of self gratification for the betterment of oneself.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will and Determinism have been discussed by philosophers for many years. Free will is associated with moral responsibility, and alternative actions that “could have” been taken over the one chosen. Determinism is the opposite view, and is associated with universal causation, and a lack of free will. Determinists believe that a person’s actions are inevitable, they are dictated by a person’s experiences, they believe nurture, nature, and even a person’s genes determine their future actions. Because of this determinists believe people hold no moral responsibility for their actions.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays