The definition for zero tolerance policy is refusal to accept antisocial behavior, typically by strict and uncompromising application of law. This translates to if you’re caught in an unlawful act you pay the consequences, no ifs, ands, or buts. The zero tolerance policy main goal is to stop serious crime by going after minor offenses. Such as, arresting drug dealers to stop the buyers from stealing or killing people for money. This policy has a set of responses to particular crimes, although what happens in the courts become discrete. Before the zero tolerance policy was passed, many more laws were enacted that lead up to it being passed. In 1968, the Gun Control Act was passed. This made more restrictions to buy guns and kept more detailed
…show more content…
The policy tries to keep schools away from harm and remain safe. Personally I, and many parents would agree nothing’s wrong with this. By using these acts, it gives a fair punishment to anyone who disobeys them, because a punishment is already set. If a girl harasses a boy, she’ll get the same punishment as a boy who harasses a girl. On a more serious note, drug use and schools shootings have been dealt with also. After the Columbine school shooting, which left 13 dead and 20 wounded, people across the country were worried the same thing would happen to their town. From then on, any violent actions or remarks were taken seriously and more precautions were taken. The 1994 Gun Free Schools Act was issued and stated anyone in possession of a weapon had to be expelled for a year. On college campuses, schools can prohibit the distribution of alcohol and drugs to stop underage drinking and illegal activities. Other precautions such as metal detectors and drug searches go on to keep schools safe. School shootings have long lasting impacts on the community as a whole. Shootings can lead to depression, suicides, and drug or alcohol abuse. We need to deal with them now, and if that means harsh school rules and precautions then so be it. After all, wouldn’t you rather hear complaints from your child instead of the
The policy tries to keep schools away from harm and remain safe. Personally I, and many parents would agree nothing’s wrong with this. By using these acts, it gives a fair punishment to anyone who disobeys them, because a punishment is already set. If a girl harasses a boy, she’ll get the same punishment as a boy who harasses a girl. On a more serious note, drug use and schools shootings have been dealt with also. After the Columbine school shooting, which left 13 dead and 20 wounded, people across the country were worried the same thing would happen to their town. From then on, any violent actions or remarks were taken seriously and more precautions were taken. The 1994 Gun Free Schools Act was issued and stated anyone in possession of a weapon had to be expelled for a year. On college campuses, schools can prohibit the distribution of alcohol and drugs to stop underage drinking and illegal activities. Other precautions such as metal detectors and drug searches go on to keep schools safe. School shootings have long lasting impacts on the community as a whole. Shootings can lead to depression, suicides, and drug or alcohol abuse. We need to deal with them now, and if that means harsh school rules and precautions then so be it. After all, wouldn’t you rather hear complaints from your child instead of the