Declaratory Theory Of Law Case Study

2264 Words 9 Pages
1a. The court system of England and Wales as we know today has emerged through the evolution of society and culturization. A demonstration of how drastically the system has changed, is that since the nineteenth century, there were particular courts for equity and common law. Forward to present day, the structure of higher courts were set by the ‘Supreme Court of Judicature Acts 1873 and 1875. In detail, the earliest courts are known as magistrate courts, with the newest court forged in 2009, known as the Supreme Court. However, these are not the only courts that have arrangement with ‘criminal’ and ‘civil’ cases, with over 2 million cases each year heard in inferior courts. With most civil cases being heard in county courts, and most criminal …show more content…
To describe the declaratory theory of law, it is said that judges do not make the law, they only proclaim what the law states and what it has dependably been and apply it. Using the declaratory theory of law has frequently been utilized by individuals in the legal system as a method to protect judiciary and constitutional juries and judges against the allegations of others that judges can indeed create laws.
In actuality, within the evolution of England and Wales Legal system the judiciary now exhibit a level of legal innovativeness which brings about the formation of law. A well known case to develop this, would be the tort instance of Donoghue v Stevenson.This case was understood to demonstrate that the judiciary can and do make the law. In summary, the case detailed that the petitioner was requesting that the legal add to a legislation that was generally not in presence. However, in addition to this, the inquirer went beyond that, by also asking the judge to completely change the law so it supported their statement and case while yet to reflectively apply that law to the occasion being referred to. The outcome was that in 1932 the judges expressed that the respondent had an obligation of duty of care towards the petitioner that did not really exist in 1928 when the episode happened. (The Open University ( 'OU '), 2016b,
…show more content…
Which is of course restricted, it does have however, significant force in the regulatory circle, through what is known as 'judicial review '. This alludes to the capacity of an individual or gathering that has been liable to a choice by an administrative body to test that choice through the managerial arm of the High Court, and the capacity of the courts to nullify that choice in the event that it doesn 't consent to certain procedural necessities or is past the lawful force of the body being referred to. As of late this arrangement of forces has expanded extensively as the courts have pushed back against the development of the 'managerial state '. This advancement implies that numerous choices of open significance are currently taken by semi independent and non-legislative associations, and political choice making is progressively expelled from Parliament and incorporated in the hands of the official. While the courts can 't negate enactment through this strategy under the UK constitution, the capacity to drive a choice of, for instance, an administration office to be reevaluated is an intense apparatus. (The Open University ( 'OU '), 2016b,

Related Documents