What Is The Death Penalty Effective

Improved Essays
Through the years, America and its people have relied on lethal injection, the electric chair, and hanging to teach criminals a lesson. The governmental process of putting criminals on death row and having them sit and wait until the day they die just does not sound right. The death penalty is not effective in any way because it does not teach people anything. In my opinion, the government makes itself seem like the bad guy because if one were to kill another and then get put on death row, it is as if the government is saying “since you killed him, we are going to kill you.” Honestly, who would learn from that?
The death penalty originated in the 18th century B.C.E. It was a part of Hammaurabi’s code, “an eye for an eye.” His ideas were not
…show more content…
The government/jury is acting like a religious figure to the people sentenced. They are telling them in a sense “since you committed this sin you shall die or be killed.” The government/jury is not a religious figure; they are a political power that has no right to do this. They do have the right to put someone in jail but no right to put someone to death over something. I think the person should be imprisoned for life and when they pass away naturally then they can be judged by their own religious figure. They then can be sentenced to heaven or hell (depending on their beliefs). Also, most religions state that committing murder sends you to hell, so, what does this mean about the government/jury? Are they a bunch of murderers going to hell or are they clean good-hearted people trying to clean up the world of bad …show more content…
According to the deathpenalty.org, “the death penalty always traumatizes both families and for the victim’s family, it most often re-opens the wound of their loved one passing.” Families also feel like they have now two burdens upon them, one with the loss of their loved one, and the second being technically getting the murderer put on death row. The website believes that the death penalty should be replaced with life in prison without parole. I believe that’s the best possible idea we have come up with. Law enforcement also has similar views about the death penalty. Police chief James Abbott stated, “I know that in my practice, the death penalty does more harm than good. I stand before you to say that society is better off without capital punishment, life in prison without parole in a maximum-security facility is a better alternative.” That statement comes straight from law enforcement and for them to think the idea is worthless means a lot. Also according to the deterrence report of 2012, capital punishment has no effect on homicide

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment has been around for hundreds of years and was brought to America by the Europeans in the early 1600s; The first recorded death being back in 1608. Back in that time the Death Penalty was used in many cases from thievery to murder, making it the social norm during that time. Though in today’s society, capital punishment has been deemed by some as inhumane or morally wrong. In some ways it’s become a political issue in which a higher percentage of Republicans favor the death penalty more so than Democrats.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the death penalty is a part of the system, the death penalty draws only the worst of us in the human race and only satisfies a craving for the only thing people want when they have been wronged and that is revenge. Revenge is not only something that is never ending and never satisfies those who have gotten revenge, it also only enables a vicious continuous circle for hatred. Which is one of many reasons that I am not only opposed to the death penalty, but that the death penalty should be abolished altogether. Revenge is defined “as to exact punishment or expiation for a wrong on behalf of, especially in a resentful or vindictive spirit.” I believe that the death penalty as it is in the justice system is the worst and most extreme of the system.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the end the death penalty is not such a big problem little of the flak that is gotten from the murder of criminals is only from a moral obligation of wanting to be superior and being on a moral high ground but that is what America is about. The reason this glorious country still has one of the oldest laws is because it works. Death is an absolute…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the criminal justice system, there are different ways court judges choose criminal punishment. The choices escalated from parole, prison sentence, and capital punishment. In any case, the death penalty is not addressed on a coherent point of view alone because it conveys emotions, morals, and religious components. The death penalty is accepted to seize assist wrongdoing that the criminal may carry out a wrongdoing later on. Which is argued that it gets lawbreakers free too easy and some people argue that it is the right discipline because of the wrongdoing.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the same time the methods used are different, people today believe it is desensitized to get closure by killing another human being for committing a capital offense. Our means to deter criminal activity ore to keep criminals from recidivating, in my opinion, do not work very well. The individuals on death row have to wait years to receive their punishment for their wrongdoing. The less serious offenders do their time as set in place by the system, with the possibility of parole, and after they do their time, they’re released back on the streets without having a reason not to commit another crime. Face the facts, if the offender can stay on the officer’s good side, stay off of the radar of the rough inmates, and is okay with being alone, the positives for the offender is a free bed, free food, and free showers.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is a waste of time, money, and resources. The death penalty should be abolished because of the systematic flaws, along with the economic and ethical issues that come along with it. The death penalty is inhumane primarily because nobody should get to decide who live and who dies. It is considered cruel and unusual punishment, but according to the Supreme Court, it is the appropriate punishment for particular crimes. Essentially, two wrongs do not make a right, so there is no point in killing individuals that have done the…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The word “death” is adept at sending a cold, frightening shiver down the spine of any human. It is a major fear factor that has been lurking around the corner since the beginning of time, for governments have been using death to their advantage to threaten and bend people to their own will since the eighteenth century B.C. The threat towards one life for not adhering to government laws is called capital punishment, and it is still very much active in present day society. In fact, the death penalty has been in America since the colonial times, 31 US states still use capital punishment, and there has been numerous controversies surrounding the death penalty on whether it is being disproportionately subjected onto minority groups. Capital punishment was an idea brought to America by British and other European explorers.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Taking the life of another has been considered a heinous crime that is worthy of capital punishment; but should taking the life of a person who has taken the life of another be justified? Is the murderer’s life less important than that of the person whose life he took? The death penalty has been the highest form of punishment around the United States, execution of innocent men, its negative influence on our society and the offence it has against human rights are all concerns that make the capital punishment wrong. The first established death penalty laws date as far back ats the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty has been used for thousands of years, dating all the way back to Hammurabi’s Code in the 1700s BC, which is most known for its famous line, “an eye for an eye”. It is still in use today, and is the subject of much controversy for a few main reasons. One, some people question the ethics of killing someone. Two, it costs an average of $90,000 more per year per prisoner to keep a prisoner on death row as opposed to a normal jail, according to Rone Tempest, award-winning author of the Goldsmith Prize for Investigative Reporting, in Death Penalty Focus: The High Cost of the Death Penalty. This money comes from taxpayers, which is the main reason that the cost of the death penalty causes so much controversy.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research by Bonner and Fessenden (2000) supports that during the last 20 years, the homicide rate in states with the death penalty has been 48 percent to 101 percent higher that in states without the death penalty. That goes to show what this punishment is doing to those criminals and the actions they proceed with. “Michigan abolished the death penalty in 1846 and has resisted reinstating it,” said Governor Engler when asked about which side he chose. He also stated that 60 percent of the residents in Michigan favored the death penalty and 100 percent of those people would not want to pay the taxes on it. In addition with Michigan, Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Alaska, West Virginia, Rhode Island, Vermont, Maine, and Massachusetts are all without the death penalty (Bonner & Fessenden 2000).…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been around for centuries. The very first recorded case was from the 16th Century BC, when a man sentenced was required to take his own life due to his nobility. The death penalty was enforced in many ways,…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electric Chair Pros And Cons

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The death penalty has been in the United States since the first settlements were built. In that time an estimated 16,000 criminals have been put to death since the first recorded execution, back in 1608 (Ford). A amount of those criminals had killed at least one person, and good portion of them would not stop killing until they were stopped. Luckily, the criminals that were planning on never stopping, or were not able to stop, were caught and brought to justice. When the criminal is convicted, the family can feel some measure of relief about what has happened and that justice has been served knowing the criminal is off the streets.…

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many people argue about whether Capital punishment is ethical, moral and even legal. I will cover the history, supporters and opponents, The Divine Command Theory and Kant’s theory for capital punishment. Executions were practiced as early eighteenth…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfair Death Penalty

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The death penalty is destroying the sanctity of the United States Justice system as we know it. The most common form of carrying out the death penalty is ineffective, the whole process of the death penalty is expensive and lengthy, and people simply don’t want it anymore. It is a barbaric way of treating criminals and is more of a burden than a benefit. There are other ways to treat terrible criminals that would keep them isolated and with no chance of escaping.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People live in a society that is surrounded by violent behavior for that reason the justice uses the death penalty to send out a positive message for those who tend to commit capital offence. Capital punishment is not an act we wish to place on a single soul, but it is the best way to keep the killer out of society and prevent any further murders. There is no concrete evidence of either positive or negative effect, but this does not mean it would not help lower the crime rate. People need to understand that the best way to prevent any possible murders in the future is not let the killer walk free. The death penalty allows us to see the seriousness of a crime and the value of life.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays