Unfair Death Penalty

Improved Essays
The death penalty is destroying the sanctity of the United States Justice system as we know it. The most common form of carrying out the death penalty is ineffective, the whole process of the death penalty is expensive and lengthy, and people simply don’t want it anymore. It is a barbaric way of treating criminals and is more of a burden than a benefit. There are other ways to treat terrible criminals that would keep them isolated and with no chance of escaping. The death penalty, as in any case, is determined by the judge and jury. The primary form of execution in all states is currently lethal injection. This lethal injection is done in a process of one, two, or three injections. The three injection system includes an anesthetic, a sedative, …show more content…
If a criminal has done awful things, do they really deserve to live? Do we really want to waste oxygen on these human beings that clearly have no regard for other human life? Many of the people on death row have been offered second chances, but squandered those chances. If they mess up more than once, then what is the point of locking them up and hoping that they learn their lesson. Well, killing them will not solve the problem, it would just push it away for a little while. There will always be criminals, and there will always be those that think that those criminals do not deserve to live. There is a simple alternative though. Rather than go through the complicated and expensive process of execution, that inmate could be locked in a lonely cell with the key forgotten. They would be left with no one to harm but themselves, totally separated from society. If an argument for the death penalty is that it is the only way to make an inmate really pay for what they did, that argument does not hold up. As mentioned, solitary confinement is an alternative, and it is a cripplingly terrifying alternative. Prisoners in solitary confinement have been proven to have undergone severe mental problems including psychosis, paranoia, insomnia, depression, and suicidal thoughts (Breslow). Studies have been done on monkeys and college volunteers. Many of the specimen in the experiments could not last long in isolation, with …show more content…
There have been many mistakes in the administration and use of the lethal injection, and there is very little way to limit those mistakes. Putting inmates on death row is also extremely expensive for the American taxpayer. There is no reason that the American people should be forced to pay more for the “worst” criminals. Finally, many people simply do not support the death penalty anymore. Many juries do not want to be responsible for the death of a person, especially if that person was wrongly accused. There is very little reason to keep the death penalty when there are alternatives that are more effective, cost efficient, and popular. The saying goes, “An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.” - Mahatma

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A Death In Texas Summary

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the forms is electrocution, which takes about 2,000 milliamps to cause cardiac arrest. That capacity is a strong painful shock. Another type of execution is lethal injection. Lethal Injections can contain pentobarbital or midazolam hydrochloride. It could take up to 2 hours for death, even though it’s supposed to be a quick process.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the process will then repeat. Medical personnel will assess the inmate each round but must first wait five minutes due to the scorching body temperature. The death penalty has been one of the most controversial topics in the entire criminal justice system. From the costs, religion, victim impact, inmate and staff psychological effects, botched executions, deterrence, all the way to those who have no opinion at all, the arguments have fallen into several different categories.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Death of the Death Penalty”, David Von Drehle states that the death penalty is becoming less common and should now just be abolished because of the cost and time that it takes. Drehles article was published in Time Magazine. He concludes that the death penalty has become unnecessary and doesn’t work anymore. The crime rate in the United States has declined so much that in the past decade even though there are hundreds of people under the death penalty. This statement is making people believe that there is no reason to keep the death penalty in our society.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All around in some people 's opinion the death penalty is cruel and unfair. These are new ages and our culture has far grown out it’s brutish past traditions, so why should we continue to take barbaric transactions that have no place in today 's advanced society. The death sentence is uncivilized and therefore the death sentence…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, not everyone agree to impose the death penalty and there are the rest that are strictly against it. Furthermore, some would be for the death penalty giving that it was created to: deter people from crime, a punishment that fits the crime of murder, as well as to protect the society from individuals that behaves in such manner. On the flip side of that would be the people that are not for the death penalty. They concerns are valid likewise to those whom are for it. In fact some feel as though the death penalty is inhumane, unfair, only makes the murder rate increase (Schmalleger, & Smykla, 2014).…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Executing a criminal through death penalty costs much more money than by just simply putting them in jail for the rest of their life. The State’s economy is currently under the debt of $18 trillion…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Punishment

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    We should not allow one who has murdered to remain a murderer. The ones truly affected are the victims and the ones sentenced to death no one will shed a tear for. Prison is a vacation for most prisoners they are fed three times a day, have a roof over their heads, and are given jobs. To allow them to live with a life sentence is giving them an easy out not the death penalty. By taking their life they will not be given the luxuries to see family, have meals, and live day to day.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Abortion Cons

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I agree that the cost of having someone on the death penalty and putting someone through it is very expensive but for a the victims families it can be the only form of closure available to them. The death penalty is also said to be too “harsh” of a punishment but I think if a criminal murders someone or rapes someone then that is totally justifiable for the death penalty. Of course the extra time and ridiculous cost of the death penalty is frowned upon, but I do think that the version of the death penalty can be vastly improved…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is unfitting for the American justice system because of its lack of accuracy and lack of mercy. There are so many ways people are treated with privilege or discrimination based on their abilities, culture, gender or gender expression, mental stability, intelligence, race, religion, sexuality, wealth, where they live, etc. Human beings, as well as trials, are imperfect - even without these prejudices. Mistakes can be made, and often misrepresentation in court can lead to an innocent person on death row. For not being one hundred percent certain of innocence or guilt, it’s not up to humans to decide on a terminal punishment such as death.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The way we view ourselves as human beings relies on our morality and compassion towards others. Our ability to forgive those who have done us wrong and seek proper justice has become a standard. Capital punishment manages to defy all these standards. Wasting government funding on executing already captured criminals wastes millions of taxpayers dollars every year. Reverting back to the usage of the death penalty makes us no better than our ancestors and prove that we have learned nothing over this long and violent period of time.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is mainly used in criminal cases when a criminal kills multiple people, he or she is a fugitive of the law, or when someone else has over sixty offenses. There are restrictions on who the penalty can be used against and the reason, for the penalty being put on a person. It is known that there are exceptions to all the rules and for this reason the death penalty should not be allowed in the United States. Imagine being a grieving mother whose child made a mistake because no one saw the warning signs, and no one got him help. It is realized that what they did was wrong but no matter how bad the crime committed was, you cannot force yourself to love your family any less and seeing someone you love punished by death is hard for…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every day, people are executed by the state as punishment for a variety of crimes. Life without Parole is an alternative to the Death Penalty. In every state that retains the death penalty, jurors have the option of sentencing convicted capital murderers to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Unlike the death penalty, a sentence of Life without Parole also allows mistakes to be corrected. According to the California Governor's Office, only seven people sentenced to life without parole have been released since the state provided for this option in 1977, and this occurred because they were able to prove their innocence.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty has continuously been used ever since European settlers brought it over in the seventeenth century. “The first recorded execution in the new colonies was that of Captain George Kendall in the Jamestown colony of Virginia in 1608” (“Part I: History of the Death Penalty”). He was executed for being a spy for Spain. The death penalty varied and each colony had different laws regarding it during colonial times. In Virginia, Governor Sir Thomas Dale enacted the Divine, Moral, and Martial Laws.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty costs taxpayers more money than prison holdings, is religiously immoral, is an unscrupulous solution for homicide victims’ families, and puts innocents at risk. The only way to solve this problem, is for the United States of America to abolish…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital Punishments role in America plays a huge part in how America handles offenders and repeat offenders. Staticbrain.com reports that Time magazine says,” An estimated 2,000,000 people have been victims of crimes, from assault to murder. With insufficient laws to address these issues, criminals become careless and bolder. For this reason, there is a need for a death penalty.” Capital punishment, should not be abolished because, it takes committing a heinous act to receive the death penalty.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays