David Held's Rejection Of English Modernity In European Society

Superior Essays
With reference to the quote provided, David Held (1992) asserts to the reader the most fundamental step that is to be made within not only European society (by the citizens) but externally too (by the colonised themselves) to initiate change: resistance. As stated within the quote provided, in order to attain something new or rather something than to what one was previously acquainted with, the current order would need to be challenged: European society challenging the limitations placed upon individuals by the Church (traditional society), as well as the rejection of English modernity, forcefully implemented in non-European territories (the colonies rejection of English modernity).
Held (1992) defined the modern state as “political apparatuses,
…show more content…
The processes invested within modern, democratic governance, has been, as well as continues to be problematic in democracy’s attempt of employing fair and effective rule, while not neglecting the one (the fall of the state’s system) or the other (the citizenry). Foucault emphasises that the art of governing, is one which most prominently entails the states control over the behaviour of the subjects it governs.
What is modernity?
Modernity, in accordance with the Oxford Concise Dictionary of Politics (2009), is stated as the “view of historical progression as a series of stages, reflecting intellectual, technological, economic, and political development”, relative to European society and its philosophers. Central to the writings of Immanuel Kant (2001), the Enlightenment movement, through which modernity originated, encourages ‘man’ to free himself from the chains of traditional society (secularism), with particular reference to the constraint endowed by religious rule in order to construct a new way of living.
Poggi: democratic vs.
…show more content…
The various societies that are founded around the world today, were formed in accordance with what had occurred over time throughout history. Held emphasises that as a result of the ruling of an absolutist state in the past, “the development of modern political rule” was made possible. The transition from an absolutist state to a modern state occurred through the uprisings against the state’s system, such that evident through the French as well as English Revolution, movements that activated the transition process. There are various forms of modern rule when in the pursuit of a modern (democratic) state. Held (1992), provided four different “forms of the modern state”, including: a liberal state, a liberal democracy, constitutionalism and finally, a one-party

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To begin their analysis of the concept of Empire, Hardt and Negri first begin with a historical recounting of the nature of previous Imperialist societies to which others may point to dispute the claim that post-modernity is somehow different from those of the past. The authors acknowledge that these past nations share characteristics in common: namely the combination of “judicial categories and universal ethical values” (Hardt 10). That is to say, previous nations affixed their actions to a particular set of values in order to justify them. This unifying ethic doesn’t necessarily need to be rooted in religion; rather, it can be based on any set of societal principles which the governing system particularly claims to be the creator and the ultimate embodiment…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Democracy is a modern idea that has been shaped throughout history by a dissatisfaction in the people with their appointed rulers. Monarchs ruled Europe for centuries before other modes of government were introduced. These rulers often viewed themselves as appointed by God, an idea some of their subjects agreed with, but most ridiculed. This conflicting opinions of the people and the rulers was the focal point of debate between the upper and lower classes. While kings and queens focused on their displaying their power and their divine right, the clergy advocated against the “evils” of the peasant-class, and the poor rallied together to demand the equality they found in Christ to be applied to their rights.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The term “democracy” can be determined as a form of government…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay discusses the Modern and Original dilemma. The Original dilemma touches on freedom versus order while The Modern dilemma focuses on Freedom versus equality. One thing that both of these dilemmas have in common is the four ideologies or belief systems that stem from both delima’s. The four ideologies are Conservative, Communitarian, Libertarian, and Liberal.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Enlightenment Dbq

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the Enlightenment period, as people began to question received authority, and they started exploring new ideas of religious toleration, individualism, and the unlimited potential of human…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant effectively quantifies freedom via his argument for his idea of enlightenment, public/private divide, trade off between rational and physical productivity and finally international governance. He runs into problems however in that he fails to effectively quantify the means of acquiring his aspirational goals of perfect moral constitution, universal enlightenment as well as global cosmopolitan governance. The following section will outline first the public private divide followed by means not considered (harm principle) and the second section will outline the means towards global cosmopolitanism as well as the limitations considered. The attainment of enlightenment is one of the highest level of understanding for Kant and correlates…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prior to the Enlightenment the majority of European countries were under the rule of monarchies and countrymen had very little say on how their lives were spent. However, thinkers like John Locke began to challenge traditional governments and to inspire people to view themselves as key players in the world they lived in. In his treatise “Of Civil Government”, Lock describes man as “the absolute lord of his own person and possessions, equal to the greatest and subject to nobody” (Fiero, 101). This new way of thinking helped establish a foundation for self-understanding from which people could begin to analyze and critique their present circumstances and begin to advocate for change. Two examples of self-examination that resulted in a call for change are “A Vindication of the Rights of Women.”…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The traditional view of men being dependent on the church for guidance or the state deciding what was right was challenged with Kant's idea of freedom of thought and freedom of religious ideas. Kant defined enlightenment as man's emergence from his self-incurred immaturity. Men could be fully autonomous and in charge of their own life without the church becoming involved as was required before the Enlightenment. Therefore, the traditional views of maturity violated the ideas of the Enlightenment. During the Enlightenment, philosophes believed that there needed to be new knowledge of non-European culture because in their discoveries, explorers saw cultures that weren’t tainted with Christianity.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the break from Calvinism, the ideals of the Enlightenment more or less stayed the same all through the apparition of the Frontier theory. This explains the recurrence of the ideals of the self, albeit more associated with self-improvement, as well as the pursuit of wealth under the latter’s principles. Under Enlightenment ideals, the desire towards progress is intrinsic with the natural rights of life, liberty, and property. Progress is linked with prosperity. The more a man owns or possesses, the more he advances in society.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Quang Minh Pham Contemporary Issue 10/8/2015 Over past 200 years, the proliferation of nation-state in the world replaced almost kingdoms, empires and city states, along with the changing of world policy and aspects of modernization. The emergence of nation-state is understandable when the power is shifted to nationalists to diffuse nation-state from an empire. The success of American Revolution in eighteenth century was the very first sign of the rising of modern sovereign nation-state – A sovereign state has their own constitution, ruled under fair law of equal residents.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These are Schumpeter’s liberal pacifism, Machiavelli’s liberal imperialism, and Kant’s liberal internationalism. One of the key arguments made here is that the differences among these subcategories is the result of theorists’ differing ideas of the citizen and the state (Doyle 1986, 1151). The baseline of liberal pacifism is that people are “rationalized, individualized, and democratized” (Doyle 1986, 1162). Liberal imperialism, on the other hand, relies on imperial expansion, as people are constantly in fear of other states and therefore seek to be the ruling elite. The final subcategory, liberal internationalism, states that people are “rationalized and individualized,” and see people as moral equals (Doyle 1986,…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Age Of Enlightenment

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the 18th century, Europe reached the glorious Age of Enlightenment, a political movement that introduced a new world of ideas to Europe and the world. Following the scientific revolution in the 17th century, advanced ideals such as liberty, progress, tolerance, fraternity, constitutional government, and separation of church and state came into people’s minds. They felt that they were enlightened, and Europe has finally emerged from a shadow. It was during this time that modern political ideologies, such as fascism and ethnic nationalism, and influential cultural movements, such as romanticism and religious revivals, were introduced. As such, the Age of Enlightenment has always been representative of the development of “modernity”.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In terms of who I want to oppose these views, the natural culmination of the development of Western liberalism is not the vision of autocracy market, but liberalism socio-political, democratic and socialized, committed to equality and social justice and respects the inalienable human rights, including the right social and cultural rights, '' applicable in all political circumstances '' - which forcefully pointed out, among others, Pope John Paul II on the 50th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948. For the investigator institutional and intellectual history of Western societies is quite obvious. The neoliberal right-wing ideologues sought to legitimize the appropriation, but the prestige of the liberal tradition, so that the presentation of its development, which would allow to treat it as a process of genuine move away from liberalism and socialism, paving the way nightmares. For this purpose, they invented the myth of '' classical liberal '', to which the return - utożsamiającego freedom…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The central focus of the liberal political model rests simply on how to respond to the state in the position of power, but the purpose is never to explain, much less justify, how it got there to begin with. Schmitt’s political theory renders liberal models essentially irrelevant right from the beginning because either the idea of how the state began is not covered in the model at all, or any serious proposal to answer that question would have to necessarily involve his concepts to justify the existence of any type of state. A connection, then, arguably exists between external and domestic factors in justifying the existence and purpose of the state. Regardless of how liberals of Schmitt’s time would construe what the ideal model of government would be for the inner workings of society within the territory in question, the presence of a reasonably powerful state, powerful enough to ensure the continued stability of the society under discussion, must be existentially present prior to a domestic scene that meets the liberal ideal popular in that…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Parliamentary Democracy

    • 2360 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The majority of the countries in Europe have a Parliamentary system in which they have cabinet which is led by the Prime minister and there is the Head of state which can be a President or the respective monarch if the country is a symbolic monarchy. Especially the function of the President is rather vague as it depends on the state. If the monarch is the head of state, the power is often limited in order to limit the unequal influence of the monarch. This differs with the President as he might have more influence as he can be democratically elected Therefore, it can be argued that Parliamentary democracy is one of the most affective governmental systems as it frequently appears in Europe. This essay will examine whether parliament is the…

    • 2360 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays