In terms of who I want to oppose these views, the natural culmination of the development of Western liberalism is not the vision of autocracy market, but liberalism socio-political, democratic and socialized, committed to equality and social justice and respects the inalienable human rights, including the right social and cultural rights, '' applicable in all political circumstances '' - which forcefully pointed out, among others, Pope John Paul II on the 50th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948.
For the investigator institutional and intellectual history of Western societies is quite obvious. The neoliberal right-wing ideologues sought to legitimize the appropriation, but the prestige of the liberal tradition, so that the presentation of its development, which would allow to treat it as a process of genuine move away from liberalism and socialism, paving the way nightmares. For this purpose, they invented the myth of '' classical liberal '', to which the return - utożsamiającego freedom …show more content…
A high-ranking dignitary James Fitzjames Stephen devoted to criticism of Mill's views of the entire book ('' Liberty, Equality, Fraternity ', 1873). It alluded directly to the ideologues of authoritarianism - mainly Hobbes, but also to de Maistre, defending the positive functions of violence and coercion in society. He criticized the freedom of thought and speech as a source of destructive skepticism, tolerance permitted only in matters of socially insignificant, even proposed legal prohibition of preaching atheism. In the spirit of hypocritical Victorian morality he advocated a course for a legal settlement of what is normal and acceptable sexual intercourse, providing that these developments will be based on increasing severity in this respect. He foresaw even legal prohibition of adultery, seduction and
For the investigator institutional and intellectual history of Western societies is quite obvious. The neoliberal right-wing ideologues sought to legitimize the appropriation, but the prestige of the liberal tradition, so that the presentation of its development, which would allow to treat it as a process of genuine move away from liberalism and socialism, paving the way nightmares. For this purpose, they invented the myth of '' classical liberal '', to which the return - utożsamiającego freedom …show more content…
A high-ranking dignitary James Fitzjames Stephen devoted to criticism of Mill's views of the entire book ('' Liberty, Equality, Fraternity ', 1873). It alluded directly to the ideologues of authoritarianism - mainly Hobbes, but also to de Maistre, defending the positive functions of violence and coercion in society. He criticized the freedom of thought and speech as a source of destructive skepticism, tolerance permitted only in matters of socially insignificant, even proposed legal prohibition of preaching atheism. In the spirit of hypocritical Victorian morality he advocated a course for a legal settlement of what is normal and acceptable sexual intercourse, providing that these developments will be based on increasing severity in this respect. He foresaw even legal prohibition of adultery, seduction and