Criminal Law Case Study

Great Essays
Both adults and children can easily commit a crime either intentionally or accidentally. However, people under the age of eighteen will be dealt with differently compared to adults. As the law perceives them to be more ‘vulnerable’ compared to adults as they may not understand the law or the difference between right and wrong. They also may not understand the consequences of their actions. The two issues that will be discussed about its effectiveness of the criminal justice system when dealing with young offenders will be the rights of children when questioned or arrested and penalties for children. The two issues are effective but there are parts to it which limits the effectiveness to response. Below the two issues will be clearly discussed. …show more content…
In most cases the person has the right to silence and wait until they have independent legal advice to respond to the police as what they say or do to the police can be used as evidence. However, young people have a slight advantage as the law recognises that they may not be aware of their rights hence this makes them much more vulnerable than adults in these situations. This is backed up through the legal act “Children (criminal proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW)”. This is effective as it allows young offenders to be protected as it enables any information spoken by the young person will not be allowed to be used as evidence. It can only be used if the young person has a responsible adult other than the police member present. This includes parents, youth worker, guardian or a lawyer. This can be seen as being very effective as it is crucial to protect young offenders as they may not understand they have the right to be silent. This is also effective protection as it forces the police member to ensure that there is an adult with them at all times or else it would be seen as ‘evidence’. In R v. CKT 1999 (NSW) case, the police conducted an interview with a murder suspect without the presence of a supporting adult, believing he was over 18 years of age, only to find out later this was not the case. Therefore evidence gained during the questioning could not be admitted into court. Furthermore the law offers protection for children when doing strip searches. This falls under the law enforcement (powers and responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW). This act eliminates the police power and permission to do a strip search on any children who are under the age of ten. Any young person between the ages of ten and eighteen will require having a responsible adult with them apart from the police. This can also be seen as a disadvantage and not effective for any

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    In the modern legal system, most jurisdictions view a person as an adult at 18 years of age. Until a person reaches this age, they are less likely to receive the full extent of a jurisdiction’s legal system. At certain parts in a child’s life, age can be used as a valid defense. If a person is under 7 years of age, they will not be charged in most jurisdictions. From the age of 7 to the age of responsibility, which is usually recognized as 16 but varies by jurisdiction, an offender can be tried in the juvenile system (criminal Law Today).…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Crimes are typically committed by those who can be considered as an adult and know what they are doing at the moment. The result of the crime leads the criminals to having the death penalty or some other kind of punishment. However, once an adolescent commits a severe crime as an adult would, the ruling becomes difficult to decide upon. As a child commits a crime of any level, that child should not be tried as an adult but rather as a juvenile. Even though the juvenile commits such heinous act, others should know that children cannot function their brain properly just yet.…

    • 1972 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are so many things that must be looked at when deciding to prosecute someone under the age of 18 into the adult criminal system. As mentioned in the beginning, not ALL juveniles should be considered for an adult sentence. However, in some cases the crime committed by the juvenile might merit adult sentencing. A deep and thorough investigation of past criminal records, mental health, nature of the crime, and maturity should be implemented. Trying juveniles and sentencing them to 1o years in prison for a petty crime, as was the case in Sean’s story, is bordering on “criminal” behavior in our justice system.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holloway further explains in his article “It is beyond debate that the human brain does not reach anything close to maturity until the early mid 20’s” (2). Everyone looks for someone to go down for the misfortune, but sometimes the criminals are too young to be considered guilty of the crime. A child has not lived long enough to learn and grow; throwing adult sentences at them prohibits the experiences provided in everyday life to allow them to mature due to the lengthy sentences. Adults are old enough to understand their actions and their consequences; the same crimes can be committed by children however some people feel that does not mean they should end up in the same prison…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The 8th Amendment

    • 2053 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Too Young or Just Right? Through history, the way society has dealt with consequences to previous unjust actions have evolved over the years, especially with children. In the 18th century kids were being sent to jail or killed for innocent crimes. Cyriaque Lamar, an expert on this time period states “During the Victorian era kinds as young as 11 received adult sentences for minor crimes”.…

    • 2053 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, there are some who believe juvenile offenders do not deserve severe punishments as adult offenders. It is argued that youth is immature, they are still developing their minds and deserve the possibility for them to readapt to the outside life. Certain individuals are diplomatic to certain occurrences. For an example, some are very sensitive to the youth that may have endured child abuse. For many people, there standpoint is affected by the age of the delinquent.…

    • 1817 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The minimum age a child can be held criminally responsible for an offence committed is a heavily debated topic universally, especially in the history of Australia to whom rectified the minimum age of criminal responsibility laws various times (Weijers and Grisso 2009). Globally the story is much the same as there is no mandatory minimum age that a child can be held responsible for there actions (Australian institute of criminology 2000), but rather their have been universally recognised rules within the United Nations Convention on the rights of a child that establishes that a child 's wellbeing must be imperative in a legal process such as in the courts (Australian institute of criminology 2000). Further on the global consensus, sovereign…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles It is estimated by the Justice Department, that more than 10 percent of homicides are committed by minors (Khan). When an adolescent commits a serious crime, he or she is most likely charged as a minor, meaning they don’t have to serve jail time and instead are sent to a juvenile detention or rehabilitation center. The problem with charging kids based on age is that each person matures at different rates and times, like Cameron Williams who ran from the police after shooting one. The Jordan Brown case which involved an eleven year old who killed Kenzie Houk.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Little People Big World Abstract: Should juveniles ever be tried as an adult? That seems to be the question of the day at this time in society. This paper helps unfold the facts about trying juveniles either way, and the legal information as to what certain states hold laws about it. It also discusses the pros and cons and what the end result is of the individual after it is all said and done in certain situations. No matter your opinion, if you want to grasp a better one about this, then reading this paper will be beneficial for you.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article raises the issue of whether young murder suspects should be tried as adults, as a result of cases in Massachusetts and how the State is going to handle the issue following the United States Supreme Court ruling that an Alabama law that gave juveniles convicted of murder mandatory life sentences without the possibility of parole was unconstitutional. Massachusetts law had anyone 14 years or older accused of murder be tried as an adult, the article at the time debated the next move the State’s Judicial Court will make. DISCUSSION While the article focuses on severe crime by juveniles, it sparks the broader debate as to whether juveniles should be tried in adult courts at all. This issue is important to me because our criminal justice system clearly distinguishes between adults and juveniles and has made juveniles court system different from adult court.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kim, Yoon Jun Sociology 1003, Fall 2015 Section #12 GPAC 1 Assignment Should some cases of juvenile crimes charge in adult criminal court? The issue of whether Juvenile Offenders should be charge in adult criminal court has been, throughout the ages, hotly debated. Some contend that adolescents are too young to be charged in adult criminal court and have not fully developed such as a maturity to accept severe punishments that adults offenders often get. Others dispute aforementioned assertion by saying that juvenile crimes are equally serious compared to adult crimes and should be transfer to adult criminal court and get punishment that they deserve.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Trying juveniles as adults gives them open opportunity to associate with violent offenders, and the chance to become victimized or assaulted. Consequently, this justifies…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The new figures show that juvenile offenders have reached the highest level of recidivism for more than a decade. During the 2013/14 period, 42,000 juvenile offenders were warned, convicted or released, and about 16,000 (or 38%) continued to commit crimes in the next 12 months. This is the highest since the beginning of the record data in 2002, an increase of 1.9 percentage points over the previous year[1]. Juvenile offenders dropped from 165,000 to 50,000, and the total number of guardians declined, but the young man who committed the crime again had 3.12 new offenses, which is the highest in ten years[1]. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) described the number of recidivism as "shocking" and said, "This proves why our reform is so important.”…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should young offenders who commit indictable offences be tried as adults and give up their rights to be tried under The Youth Criminal Justice Act? We all know right from wrong, we all know not to make stupid decisions but adolescents do not think before they act they commit crimes and become young indictable offenders standing trial, but should these offenders be treated as adults and give up their right to be tried under the Youth Criminal Justice Act. All young offenders who commit indictable offences should NOT be tried as adults and give up their rights to be tried under the Youth Criminal Justice Act. Young offenders who commit indictable offenses should not have their right to be tried under the Youth Criminal Justice Act taken away…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    PUNISHMENTS & SENTENCES AVAILABLE IN CRIMINAL LAW INTRODUCTION The following are elements of a crime: an act of commission or omission on the part of a human being has been provided by the laws set in a country to be harmful, the transgressions of such harmful acts are prevented by a threat or sanction of punishment administered by the state and the guilt of the accused is determined after the accusation against him has been investigated according to the legal proceedings as provided for the constitution. There are four theories of punishment to support the use of punishment in society. They include Retribution, deterrence, prevention, reformation.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics