Abhay Gupta's Speech Summary

Improved Essays
This speech was written by Abhay Gupta, one of the most respected criminal lawyers in the nation, at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Gupta. He was disturbed by the notion that many criminals did not properly repent for their wrongdoings; instead of receiving a death sentence, they spent their lives in prison living an easy life. After spending time with many mass murderers and drug lords, he concluded that the world would be a better place without such individuals. He gave this speech to promote the idea that criminals who deserve death should receive it. His speech at a criminal justice convention targeted high-profile politicians, judges, ranking military officials, and legislative members to raise awareness about capital punishment.
______________________________________________________________________________
Good afternoon respected guests, When I first became a lawyer, my first case was to defend an innocent man from conviction. After getting to know him a bit better, I felt that it was my obligation to prove his innocence because he deserved his freedom. Having spent a majority of my life trying to protect criminals from unfair justice, I’ve gained a place at one of the most prestigious law firms in the country. I’ve spent countless hours with criminals, understanding that each criminal is unique in his or her own way. Spending time with them has taught me a
…show more content…
It also a more efficient process than a life-sentence, and prevents additional crime from happening, as well as constituting a completely humane procedure. For criminals who deserve it, capital punishment is an effective form of justice compared to a life-sentence in jail. As Benjamin Disraeli once said, “Justice delayed is justice denied.” Criminals should face the consequences of their actions at the right time; they should not be able to spend their entire lives in a cell, pretending to repent for their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Stephen Bright writes his essay highlighting factors which he believes are reasoning for abandoning the practice of death sentences. These reasons include the violation of human rights, as well as arbitrary and unfair inflictions. Unfortunately, Stephen…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When someone commits a crime there are many punishments they can receive. House arrest, fines, jail time are some of the most common. But one type of punishment is the most polarizing of them all, the death penalty. Whether the death penalty should be used is often a debated topic between the science of killing someone for their crimes, or the more religious beliefs that it is cruel and unusual to use the death penalty. When considering people who were sentenced to the death penalty like Gregg, Penry, and Baze.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He meets a myriad of people incarcerated for many different reasons, but most of them share one commonality; the death sentence they have incurred is unjust. In fact, in most of these cases, it is the system that fails these people and sentences them to die.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This article, written for Time Magazine, gave people a better idea of what was going on with the death penalty and understand why the era of capital punishment is coming to an end. The organization of “The Death of the Death Penalty” was confusing and sometimes I didn’t quite understand what was being talked about. The essay’s argument, however, is constructed logically by giving the reader facts and statistics. Von Drehle argues that the capital punishment system has failed and causes our government to spend millions of dollars on…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The discussion organized into six different issues; deterrence, incapacitation, caprice and bias, cost, innocence, and retribution, portrays thoughts and research that has both opposed and supported capital punishment in the last twenty-five years. In turn, the three-major observations that were derived from this discussion include first, significant changes death penalty debates throughout the years, second, an accelerated worldwide decline in the acceptance of capital punishment, and lastly, sending a positive message of encouragement to criminologists who feel their research doesn’t do much to persuade both public and policy makers (Radelet & Borg, 2000). Just how this review suggests, I believe that as individuals become more informed about the current research done on the effects of capital punishment we will see a major decline on pro capital punishment social norms on a worldwide…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having individuals that can testify against the false avocation that the death penalty is used to punish those truly guilty for their crimes because it displays the extreme used in the wrong instance through its ruling on the innocent. Capital punishment’s inefficiency shines through the innocents’ conviction because how is providing the wrongful ruling suppose to deter future crime it only works to diminish the public’s trust in the judicial system and the validness of the death penalty ruling. Along with innocent men speaking out against capital punishment, comes the costly and time-consuming misconception that the act of evolving the death penalty has made it more humane even though despite popular belief “the death penalty has not become more civilized with the passage of time” (Stroud III, 381). We an human beings can’t continue to turn a blind eye towards the fact that no matter how the executors of the death penalty make it look it is still the blatant taking of another’s life whether it be with a rope, a chair or lethal doses of drugs. Another reason that both Stroud and myself see as being worth ending the option of capital punishment judicial decision is the appalling conditions that create “an environment conducive to depression and hopelessness” for its inmates (Stroud, 383).…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been around for many years. It has been a controversial argument in the American society. According to the Webster Dictionary death penalty means the decision by a court of law that the punishment for someone’s crime will be death (Webster Dictionary). Over the years people have wondered many times what is the death penalty is, how this punishment works, and who qualify to receive such punishment. Many people are unaware of this social problem; it could be for many reasons.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment The electric chair. Lethal injection. Judicial murder. These are all names for capital punishment. Capital punishment is as old as human civilization.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    False confessions have become more prevalent in today’s world. With all of the technology advances today we have found out that we have convicted people who have falsely confessed. In Marion’s peer review article it says, “Since 1989, more than 1,400 wrongful convictions of innocent people have been exposed in the United States—either through DNA testing or via the discovery of other types of evidence” (Marion 65). However today we have organizations that are trying to help people with cases. These organizations included the Innocence Project, and the Advocates 4 Wrongfully Convicted.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, after I came to know them separately from the crimes that society defined them with, I was able to distinguish them as someone’s son, someone’s friend, someone’s sister and most importantly, someone of value. I do not condone the impulses that they acted upon that put them in the legal troubles they were in, prior to my working with them. I never considered what might have happened…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1985, The New Republic released Edward I. Koch ’s essay entitled “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life” to the public. This essay 's purpose was to sway readers towards a new perspective that affirms the morality and validity of capital punishment. While the article seems effective at first glance, upon further inspection the holes in its message start to become clear. For this very reason, Koch’s essay is a convincing article, yet riddled with logical fallacies and self-contradictions.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment popularity has been dwindling in the past years, with 19 states abolishing the use of the death penalty. Problems also arrive from questions of the ethicality of it and if it’s right to kill someone for killing someone. The politics behind it are very largely at play with the supreme justices being very wary to support it and since the death penalty is state dependent senators for each hold differing positions. Capital punishment is an ethically debated topic that is important to the families of victims and culprits, it’s also important to politicians and judges because the high costs and uncertainties.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most debated ethical issues throughout the entire history of man, has been capital punishment (death penalty). Is it necessary, and more importantly, is it moral to put someone to death for a crime which they have committed? This questions has been raised and debated in every country and at every period of time, as far back as known history will allow us to observe. This paper will present and discuss the dilemma of capital punishment on ethical grounds and present arguments both for and against capital punishment. This paper will also look at the history and evolution of capital punishment, as well as attempt to gauge what will become of the practice in the foreseeable future.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Speech On Death Penalty

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Some say that revenge is sweet but sentencing the death penalty to someone for killing is bitter. In the olden days the idea of the death penalty was an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. It only seemed fair that if a man took the life of another man, than it seemed reasonable that the murder’s life should be taken. However, these punishments should no longer be in tune with the present civilized time, where human beings enjoy having equal rights and to be respected by one another. Think to yourselves, does it make sense to execute an individual that murdered another person?…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics