Speech On Death Penalty

Improved Essays
Some say that revenge is sweet but sentencing the death penalty to someone for killing is bitter. In the olden days the idea of the death penalty was an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. It only seemed fair that if a man took the life of another man, than it seemed reasonable that the murder’s life should be taken. However, these punishments should no longer be in tune with the present civilized time, where human beings enjoy having equal rights and to be respected by one another. Think to yourselves, does it make sense to execute an individual that murdered another person? Capital punishment does not solve anything, it does not bring the person murdered back to life, nor does it allow to fix the problem. Instead, there are two dead people. Do we really want a government that decides who lives and who dies? Humans should not have the power to dictate who has the right to live. My objective with this speech, is to make you students reflect on the cons of capital punishment and make your form your …show more content…
My immediate answer would be yes. If someone murdered a person I cared about, I would want the worst to happen to them, I have no doubt on it. But on the contrary I have not come across such situation, and I am aware that my immediate answer would be yes because I would let my emotions gain control over my reasoning. This is why the judicial system is important, it should be taking into consideration what is right. For centuries the death penalty has existed, but murders and other crimes of violence still continue to happen. Countries that have abolished capital punishment have seen no increase in crime rates. Therefore, government should not be using the excuse that if the death penalty is abolished the crime rate will increase as there is no evidence to support such

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Justice and death seemingly go hand and hand in our justice system. When a person commits a horrible enough crime they are meet with capital punishment, other wise known as the death penalty. People who commit such crimes are portrayed as evil, soulless beings that hold no remorse for human life whatsoever. This description can be applied to most violent offenders, but what some people fail to realize that the offenders aren’t wicked monsters conjured from god knows where; they’re humans. Their actions are inexcusable of course, yet it’s important to establish the fact that they are people with thoughts and emotions, no matter how skewed they may be.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty has caused tension between more than just those who enforce it and those who receive it. The shock waves caused by the death penalty can be found building tension within the conversations of those who may not have a true role in the process but who, in the eyes of the American democracy, have a voice on the matter. As an observer of the current and past status of the death penalty, one can form the opinion and understanding the necessity of capital punishment in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty has been apart of the court rulings since its reinstatement in 1988. Although those who are against the death penalty would argue that each one of these deaths were not necessary to the safety of our nation..…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two distinguished social and political philosophers take opposing positions in this highly engaging work. Louis P. Pojman justifies the practice of execution by appealing to the principle of retribution, we deserve to be rewarded and punished according to the virtue or viciousness of our actions. He asserts that the death penalty does deter some potential murderers and that we risk the lives of innocent people who might otherwise live if we refuse to execute those deserving that punishment. Jeffrey Reiman argues that although the death penalty is a just punishment for murder, we are not morally obliged to execute murderers. Since we lack conclusive evidence that executing murderers is an effective deterrent and because we can foster the advance…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, the severity of the death penalty will make criminals want to avoid it. However, the statistics tell a different story. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the rates of murder, one of the most common violent crimes in the U.S., are higher in states using capital punishment than the ones that aren’t (Deterrence). While the general trend of murder rates has been a downwards one, there’s still a significant percentage difference in the statistics (peak difference was 46% in 2005). This evidence shows that the idea that capital punishment is a deterrent is false.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If an individual commits a lethal act, the punishment should be appropriate to the crime. For example, retribution requires a proportion between the gravity of the crime and the severity of the punishment (Barr 2010, 3). When a person faces death through the criminal justice system; justice is restored. If the citizens do not resign offenders to their destiny, then there is an apparent imbalance. Some believe Capital punishment is a retributive measure, a way of giving a person a taste of his own medicine while satisfying our deepest instincts for justice (Blecker 2013, 2).…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice." Desmond Tutu said this and I could not agree more. I think that capital punishment is morality wrong, and that Walter Berns’ “The Morality of Capital Punishment” article in Exploring Ethics fails on many grounds. Berns uses anger and a politically correct government to advocate the use of capital punishment. I am going to try and prove that Burns is wrong, and that by killing we are only fueling the fire and a continuous cycle.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Should the U.S have the Death Penalty? Do you believe in the Death Penalty? In this essay you might be persuaded to the opposite side of your belief or stuck in the middle. I got my facts and details from Death penalty in the United States: why we still have it by Kevin Rizzo, December 20, 2014.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephen Nathanson, who wrote “An eye for an eye?” suggests the factual and moral beliefs about the death penalty are wrong and need to be strictly abolished. The passage states, “ A person’s actions, it seems, provide not only a basis for a moral appraisal of the person but also a guide to how he should be treated”. Also stated, “ What people deserve as recipients of rewards or punishments is determined by what they do as agents”. The argument claiming people should get a punishment based on what they do is accurate. What is not accurate however, is suggesting if someone murders another person, they should receive capital punishment.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “After all, crime is only a left-handed form of human endeavor,” John Huston (Silver and Ursini 237). Crime has become a part of human life. To prevent it, human has created the punishment system to scare others from sin, and the ultimate payment for a crime is death sentence. Death penalty was and still thought to be the most effective and definitive way of examples for crimes’ consequences. Since 1976, the death penalty was re-instituted in the U.S:…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around the vast globe, thousands of people are sentenced to death annually (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). Should the government execute people who commit heinous crimes? In 2014, in the United States alone, 35 people were ripped of their lives on the execution table (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). It is a common belief that the death penalty is a sufficient punishment for people who commit hostile and death-provoking crimes. Yet, what justice is served by the taking of another human life?…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Taking the life of another has been considered a heinous crime that is worthy of capital punishment; but should taking the life of a person who has taken the life of another be justified? Is the murderer’s life less important than that of the person whose life he took? The death penalty has been the highest form of punishment around the United States, execution of innocent men, its negative influence on our society and the offence it has against human rights are all concerns that make the capital punishment wrong. The first established death penalty laws date as far back ats the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Surely at least some of those put onto death row for murder had their reasons for doing what they did. Whether it be good reasons or not, it made sense to them. Well, sentencing someone to capital punishment is in effect killing them. Killing them brings you practically down to the same level as the accused. You are both killing for your own reasons.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital Punishment: an Act of Justice or Revenge? To many, executing the offender of a heinous and violent murder is seen as an act of justice and retribution, and is an essential aspect of maintaining moral balance, however, perhaps the stronger and more substantial position is that the death penalty is a barbarous act of revenge, motivated by emotion rather than logic. According to the “Retributive Justice Theory” those who break the law deserve to suffer punishment, and likewise, deserve to be punished in proportion to the crime committed.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Speech On Death With Dignity

    • 2443 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Death with Dignity When a patient seeks a doctor’s attention, it is usually to ask for help with their medical issue. Whether it is prescribing medicine, performing a procedure, or just giving a yearly check-up, we usually trust doctors to do what is best for us. It is okay for someone to ask for pills to alleviate pain, but when pain is chronic and excruciating, sometimes the pills and shots don’t help. Millions of patients are declared terminally ill every year.…

    • 2443 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays