Crime Sentencing Research Paper

Decent Essays
In conclusion, different types of sentencing aim to help offenders not reoffend when crimes are committed. There are many different ways of sentencing based upon the crime committed. Sentencing helps to reassure society that their lives are safe. The main aim of sentencing is to help offenders rehabilitate themselves to live a crime free life and to punish those who need to be punished. Judges ensure when sentencing, that justice is served and to reduce crime levels. Ultimately the top priority is to ensure that society is being protected. Imagine a world where there was no punishment for crimes committed. Society would be chaotic. Sentencing helps us to know that were being protected and each offender receive the proper time for the crime

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Commerce law assessment task 3- Lachlan O’Malley Mandatory Sentencing in New South Wales 1. Mandatory Sentencing- a mandatory sentence is a court decision where legal discretion is limited by law. Most frequently, people convicted of certain crimes such as armed robbery or murder must be punished with at least a minimum number of years set in prison. 2.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harsh minimum sentencing practices around drug offences exist because of the Reagan administration’s rhetoric that blamed drugs as the primary cause of violent crime in the US during the 1980s. Prior to Reagan’s “War on Drugs” era, drug crime in the US was relatively minor, however, beginning in 1980, the number of prisoners in jail for drug related offences skyrocketed. While there were just 41,100 of these prisoners in 1980, by 2010 that number had tripled, an increase of 1,100%. One of the biggest reasons for this seemingly outrageous increase is mandatory minimums, a system devised to enact harsher sentences for first time offenders, with the goal of making them reluctant to commit the same crime again. In her book, The New Jim Crow, professor…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, there are times where certain crimes need to have an applicable punishment phase because if certain crimes like murder are just bypassed, then it would give the impression that the system is not doing what it is set up to do. When society wants to emphasize what they think the system should accomplish, what society wants is usually not what the system will ultimately decide. Society thinks that if someone does something bad, he or she should be put in prison, but where the system comes into play, everyone has at least somewhat of a second chance to redeem themselves unless it is the tenth time. After so many of the same or similar crimes are committed, something else will need to be…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that by making some changes to the mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines would in the long run make our justice system better able to serve the people. I know many of you, like I believe there should be no change to the mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines, but have you or I for that matter really thought through what that means for people like Lee Wollard or Trina Garnett? Lee Wollard didn’t hurt the young man, he protected his daughter and family, yet is spending twenty years behind bars because he fired a warning shot into his home. Trina Garnett was an abused teenager with a mental illness that needed medical care not sent to prison.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are over two million inmates in our nation’s prison system and sentencing has always been a reflection of the current sentiments of society. Before the introduction of determinate sentencing in the early eighties, the States followed an indeterminate sentencing model. It was the pressure from society to have the “punishment fit the crime” that caused our justice system to make changes in their sentencing guidelines. With these changes came mandatory minimums, when most prisoners were serving only a portion of their sentences, and the introduction to the determinate model. We will compare these two models of sentencing and the effects it has on our justice system as a whole.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the late 1950’s and throughout the 1960’s sentencing for misdemeanor or non-violent felonies where at the hands of the judges. This allowed a certain amount of controlled flexibility in how they sentenced. They came up with some very constructive ways of dealing with what they perceived as a possible and potential long term problem individual. The sentencing sometimes took on a geopolitical form by offering the individual to be sentenced, the potential problem child, to a two-year stint in the military or jail ("Military or Jail," 07/23/2015). This solved the problem at the moment, but if the military didn’t straighten him out, when he came of the military you had a highly trained individual with a chip on his shoulder.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Impact of Race, class, and gender in Policing and Sentencing Race, class, and gender have an effect on the outcomes of the American criminal justice system. However, whether that outcome is favorable or not depends on where each individual lies on the race, class, and gender hierarchy of the United States. Cassia Spohn writes in great detail about the effects of these three characteristics in her article “30 Years of Sentencing Reform.” Before Spohn lays out the findings of her research, she differentiates disparity and discrimination. Disparity, she says, refers to difference in treatment or outcome.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Good behavior will not give you parole, and the offender does not have to spend more or less time then they deserve. Determinate Sentencing is also seen as an excellent deterrent to lesser criminals, the knowledge that a certain crime will indefinitely give you a certain amount of time behind bars sways man from…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Criminal Justice System

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Review Questions Identify and discuss two different goals that the criminal justice system has. Two different goals that the criminal justice system has are deterrence and rehabilitation/reintegration. There are two types of deterrence in criminal justice. The first is general deterrence, where criminal justice exemplifies what happens to people that do commit a crime, which the crime can be specific or general.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many factors have aided in the revolutionizing of our current sentencing structure. Although the process may be painstaking, the results are more than rewarding, if changes are implemented and adhered too. Out of the many factors listed in our textbook, there were a few that needed to be briefly explained in order to fully grasp what our countries judicial system is up against.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead of mandatory sentencing, judges should be able to use their discretion to take into account all aspects of the offender’s life leading up to and motiving their offense. Mandatory sentencing operates on the logical fallacy that all offenders and crimes are the same, and therefore should be punished the same way. Again, every offender and offence are unique, and therefore deserve to be treated as…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deterrence should be considered one of the primary objectives of the criminal justice system and criminal law because deterrence acts as a countermeasure against the probability of the occurrence of criminal acts in the future. Deterrence protects public from criminal acts because “The threat of punishment deters people from engaging in illegal acts” (Cassidy, n.d.). Restitution, on the other hand, is meant to give an opportunity to a perpetrator to rectify himself and to assimilate into the mainstream society, and such an act restores faith of the common public in the justice system, and this also provides opportunity to the justice system to refrain from providing long-term punishment mistakenly to an innocent. Retribution is a goal which must be accomplished by the criminal law in order to prohibit a perpetrator to roam free again and inflict untreatable wounds to the society. And, the objective of rehabilitation must be accomplished by the criminal justice system in order to transform a perpetrator into a responsible citizen and to thereby protect the society from yet another…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. The purposes of criminal punishment can simply be divided into two schools of thought: retributionists and preventionists. Identify, define, and discuss the several criminal law key term words that are associated with these two schools of thought and conclude with your opinion of which is the most effective.....or why all are concurrently effective. Be thorough since this is important concerning the purposes of punishment in a modern society. 1.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To punish because offenders need to punish so hopefully they won’t commit a crime again, but also to rehabilitate so once the convicted offender is released he or she won’t return to prison and they will not commit crime again. 3) Why does the United States incarcerate defendants for longer periods of time than the rest of other countries? The US has the highest incarceration rate not because it has higher crime rates, but because it…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Kent Greenwalt (1983), both retributive, as well as the utilitarian perspective in relation to justification of societal punishments were prevailing methodologies. First, the main justifications for punishment using the retributive perspective were that punishment was in place due to the offender deserving to be punished for a specific wrongdoing. Greenwalt states that there is a simple justification for using this perspective, if there is an offender who has violated the law that others have to follow, then the offender is worthy of punishment to reestablish the moral order that has been damaged by the committing of a crime. In this particular perspective, there is a justification in place that the community, society, etc.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays