Court Cases: Chief Justice Warren Burger

Decent Essays
The Court ruled unanimously that President Richard Nixon had to surrender the tapes. Chief Justice Warren Burger delivered the opinion of the Court. Burger wrote, “The impediment that an absolute, unqualified [executive] privilege would place in the way of the primary constitutional duty of the Judicial Branch to do justice in criminal prosecutions would plainly conflict with the function of the courts under Art[icle] III.”

Burger then turned his attention to the damage that a privilege of confidentiality would cause to citizens' constitutional rights: “The right to the production of all evidence at a criminal trial similarly has constitutional dimensions. The Sixth Amendment explicitly confers upon every defendant in a criminal trial the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Provide a fully developed essay of at least 500 words, and cite sources used. Marbury versus Madison is considered the most important cases in the history of the Supreme Court. The case took place around from 1789 and lasted until 1803. The constitution called for three branches of the government: legislative, executive, and judiciary. Articles I and II covered legislative and executive.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nixon handed over the tapes to Jaworski ( the special prosecutor) to try and get this situation over with. The attorney for the President argued that the tapes should not be used in court because they were granted executive privilege. Executive privilege is the power claimed by the President and other members of the executive branch to resist certain subpoenas by the legislative and judicial branches of government to access information The President is protected by Article II, constitutional privilege, that privilege is not absolute, this allows him to hold information and not have to hand it over to other…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that these two justices’ jurisprudence, or philosophy of law, is shaped by their political ideologies. This is not to say, however, that I believe that the two justices’ political ideologies affect their ability to come to objective decisions since ultimately, their most important task is to remain impartial. The two SCOTUS justices are on the opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. In addition to their opposite ideologies, the pair has two completely different philosophies of law and therefore, vary in their methods of interpretation. Justice Breyer’s political alignment is more towards the liberal side of the court.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    US V. Nixon Case Study

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Based on the textual commitment of lack of judicially discovery and manageable standards, the court found the case was non-justiciable giving them power to rule on it. Nixon doesn’t have absolute privilege to withhold information, therefore his conviction was affirmed. The court held that the question of whether or not the Senate violated the U.S. Constitution was declared non-justiciable. (The Oyez Project, United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). The clause provides three requirements and as long as those rules weren’t violated, the court could not rule on additional impeachment procedures; done by the Senate…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The court rejected Nixon claim to have “immunity from review judicial process”, the Supreme Court also found that the court has a final say determining Constitutional question. The court ruled in the Senates favor on the strength that the law only three requirements for impeachment is: “must be under oath”, a “two-third “vote is required, and if the “president is tried for impeachment the chief of Justice must be present”. (The Oyez Project, United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974).Which none of these rules where violated under the law.…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thurgood Marshall is arguably one of the most important Supreme Court justices in the history of the United States. Thurgood Marshall was born in Baltimore, Maryland, he graduated from Lincoln University and from Howard University Law School. Thurgood began his legal career at the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Working his way up to Chief Legal Officer, Thurgood ran the effort to end racial segregation for the next twenty years. One of Thurgood’s most famous cases argued was Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States versus Nixon supreme court case was a decision made in which Richard Nixon was forced to return the tape recordings and materials to the federal court,…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chief Justice Earl Warren Many Supreme Court Justices have left behind some type of legacy. John Marshall for instance, through the Marbury v. Madison case he was able to confirm the establishment of judicial review- the ability of the Supreme Court to limit congressional power by declaring legislation unconstitutional. In his paper, I will be focusing on former Supreme Court Justice, Earl Warren. This paper explains his early life, law practices, and the legacy he left behind.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the 1960’s America was facing many controversial issues such as the civil right movements, Nuclear arms race, The Vietnam War and young adults were becoming unhappy with the current political and cultural standards so they began to express themselves and their newfound desire for equality, peace, and love. And their unwillingness to conform to the rules and standards of the U.S. began the rebellion and the new generation, counterculture. In the the spring of 1962 five dozen college students known as Students for a Democratic Society met near Port Huron, Michigan to discuss these troubling political issues and on June 16, the gathering ended when they agreed on a political stance that would clearly express their ideals known as the Port…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Warren court was a time full of life changing events, whether they were good or bad they affected everyone. Changes were being made quite frequently to civil rights, judicial and federal powers. The Warren court was known for several different things such as: ending racial segregation, putting a stop to prayer in public schools, making the right to privacy very clear through the constitution, and much, much more. Without the Warren court, there is no say on how the United States would be right now. The background of the court is about as important as what happened during the years that it took place.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marbury v. Madison was a benchmark United States Supreme court case in which the court formed the foundation for the exercise of Judicial review under Article 3 of the US constitution. The landmark decision of this case, defined the boundaries between the Executive and Judicial branches of the US government. Case Summary The case started with the petition filed to the supreme Court on February 11, 1803 by William Marbury. William Marbury had been appointed justice of Peace in the district of Columbia by the president John Adams but whose commission was not later delivered.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The prosecutor handling the case required audio tapes recorded by Nixon in the office but Nixon termed the move as “executive privilege” (Uscourtsgov, 2018). On the other hand, many people questioned if it was the president’s right to protect crucial information using the “executive privilege” confidentiality power that is immune from judicial abilities (Uscourtsgov, 2018). The law in scrutiny was Article II of the United States constitutional privilege. F. 367 U.S. 643 Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Argued: March 29, 1961 Decided: June 19, 1961 The suit involves Cleveland police officers who pursued the bombing suspect and evidence at the petitioner Miss Mapp’s house (Uscourtsgov, 2018).…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Watergate Case Study

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Doar, an attorney, and Peter Rodino Haldeman, the chairman, subpoenaed Nixon for the tapes from the wiretap of the phone in his office. Referring to executive privilege, Nixon refused to release the tapes and instead told them to use the already publish white-house transcript. On July 24 1974, the Supreme Court decided in United States v. Richard M Nixon that executive privilege did not apply to the Watergate tapes. The Supreme Court ordered Nixon to give all the tapes to Jaworski. The House Judiciary Committee recommended that the full House vote to impeach Nixon for contempt of Congress, abuse of power, and obstruction of justice.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Cases

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Through the Constitution, there is clear evidence of how the Supreme Court is organized, how they are given the jurisdiction to hear cases, and what powers are given to them. We see first how the law of DOMA was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court against Congress. DOMA was unconstitutional because of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which states that "judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and such inferior Courts". To expand on this subject, this is changed when the case Marbury v. Madison takes place. In the Marbury v. Madison case, where judicial review came from (the Judiciary Act decided how many people would be in Supreme Court, and the court system underneath them), Supreme Court declared the Judiciary Act…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Watergate Scandal Essay

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Richard Nixon was in one of the most controversial issues that the United States has ever seen. The Watergate Scandal is now well known throughout history today. This issue led to Nixon resigning only 2 years in his 2nd term. Did President Nixon make the right decisions? Can anyone really trust the government after a situation like this?…

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays