Animal Testing Controversy

Superior Essays
The Moral Controversy on Using Animal for Research Historically, the health and well being of humans have taken precedent over those of animals’. Only recently have animal “rights” become a major and sometimes controversial topic in the general public. The controversy is inflamed by the fact that it is common practice to use animals for medical research. Different people have many different views on this topic. Is it humane to experiment on animals? Does a life-saving vaccine warrant the pain of a dog or cat that has deliberately been given a disease? Is extending a medical understanding worth the caging and mutilation of an animal? One must consider a variety of different perspectives to come to a reasonable conclusion on the question, should …show more content…
According to the American Medical Association, all progression in medical science in the twentieth Century has been attained either directly or indirectly through the use of animals in experiments. The many people who agree with the AMA share a second and very different perspective about using animals for experimental research. They assert that there are astonishing similarities between the physiological systems of humans and different species of animals. For example, they point to the fact that much of what we know about the immune system has come from studies with mice, and much of what we know about the cardiovascular system has come from studies with dogs. Without animal research doctors would be at a great disadvantage, possibly even in the dark, about many of the types of diseases that can spread on to humans. With that being said, the total riddance of animal testing will set back the development of crucial medical devices, medicines, and treatment (Hajar). Those who support this idea that animals are vital to medical advancement point to the American Welfare Act’s strict controls about the use of animal testing, particularly regarding potential pain. As stated in the above paragraphs, the act regulates the alleviation and elimination of pain. In section 12 of this act, it states “the Secretary is authorized to promulgate humane standards and recordkeeping requirements governing the purchase, handling, or sale of dogs or cats by dealers or research facilities at auction sales” (Public). With that being said, each institution must have an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. This is a committee made up of three or more members who meet different, specific qualifications. These people must review research protocols and administrate evaluations of the institution 's

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Roughly twenty-six million animals are used for different types of testing in the United States every year (Animal Testing - Procon.org). These tests range from developing medical treatments, determining the toxicity of medications, checking the safety of products that will be used by humans, to healthcare and commercial uses (Animal Testing - Procon.org). Proponents to animal research and testing back their views up with the fact that there are laws in place to prevent the mistreatment of animals, such as the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) (Animal Testing - Procon.org). The Animal Welfare Act defines an animal as, “any live or dead dog, cat, monkey, guinea pig, hamster, rabbit, or such other warm blooded animal.” (Animal Testing - Procon.org).…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Simon Festing and Robin Wilkinson, in their article, The Ethics of Animal Research, published in June 2007, address the topic of animal experimentation and testing and argue that it has greatly benefitted medical research and that discontinuing its use would have serious consequences in public health. Festing and Wilkinson support their claim first by establishing their credibility with the use of many reputable sources, second by utilizing data and statistics, and lastly by taking into consideration the perspectives of the opposing side. The overall purpose of the authors is to clarify the current issues with animal research in order to prove that testing animals is still the best solution. The authors employ a scientific tone in order to present an argument that appeals to individuals that have diverse views…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The controversy begins with the idea that animals that are not treated humanely prior to, during, and after research. According to Jacqueline L. Longe, writer of the article “Animal Experimentation,” “The Animal Welfare Act (Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966, P.L. 89-544) was signed into law by then-President Lyndon Johnson in August 1966. The Act covers the humane housing and treatment of cats, dogs, hamsters, rabbits, nonhuman primates, and guinea pigs.” Precautions have already been taken to ensure that household animals are not treated poorly but are treated humanely. Animals that are needed specifically for research such as rats and mice are exempt from the Animal Welfare Act because they are highly important for health research.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    "The Flaws And Human Harms Of Animal Experimentation". Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24.04 (2015): 407-419. Web. 27 Mar. 2017. " Alternatives To Animals - Ethics Of Medical Research With Animals".…

    • 2147 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question of whether if testing on animals is ethical and humane was raised and examined. Up until the 20th century, animal testing was looked at as ethical under any circumstances. It was assumed that animals feel very little to no pain and don’t have the same rights as humans. According to M.A. Fox, an ethical philosopher, “Animals do not have ‘rights’ equivalent to humans due to their exclusion from the human ‘moral community’” (Baier 137-138).…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When animals are used in medical research, it is great way to uncover the mysteries and find treatments or even cures for various diseases. For example, in Shany Sun’s Young Scientists Journal article, “The Truth Behind Animal Testing,” the author says, “…medical advancements that have been discovered through animal testing include penicillin, blood transfusions, insulin (that controls blood sugar levels of diabetics), kidney transplants, and vaccines for polio and meningitis” (Sun 1). This example shows just how beneficial animal testing in medical research can be. These medical advancements would not have been available for years if animal testing had not…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supporters of animal experimentation say that using animals are important, however there are many methods used today that do not require the use of animals. Many methods used today instead of animal experimentation are in vitro testing, microfluidic chip testing, microdosing, imaging studies, and computer models and simulations (“ethics of medical research with animals” 1-3) In spite of, their differences animal supporters and animal experimentation supporters have things in…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animals have been used repeatedly in the past for biomedical research, in recent years animal testing has been under severe criticism by animal rights groups. Laws have been passed in many countries in order to make animal testing more ‘humane’ but many argue that the benefit to humans is not worth the torture to these defenseless animals. Scientists William Russel and Rex Burch publish a book titled “The principles of Humane Experimental Technique” in 1959 where they expressed their concerns with animal testing. Due to their concern along with other factors it led to the Animal Welfare Act by the U.S. federal government in 1966. Although the act did not stop animal testing it did ensure that the animals received proper care.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “In July 19, 2011, USDA inspection report cites the Harvard Medical School five times for violations including unqualified personnel, inadequate supervision of experimentation by the lab's Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee, and inadequate housing for primates” (Hunnicutt). Despite the benefits of animal testing, animal rights activists have shed a light on the horrible things these animals needlessly suffer. Because of this information, laws were passed against treating animals inhumanely; however, we still hear about examples of cruelty in animal testing to this day. In the past, animal testing has helped create lifesaving medicines and procedures, but it should not be allowed anymore because despite laws, companies continue to abuse animals, and new technologies are continuing to be developed everyday that can replace animal testing.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine your family pet being enclosed in a small, cold, and dirty cage for days, weeks, or even months on end, only being taken out to be subjected to painful experiments without any anesthetic, as well as the possibility of developing life threatening diseases and injuries. Too many animals experience this on a regular basis around the globe - in fact, nearly 25 million animals will be used as test subjects annually. Animal testing is a horrible occurrence, one that brings suffering to even the smallest of creatures. Many people do not know the extremes of the effects of this practice, which are unnecessarily painful to animals, or that alternatives do exist, and that the results are not always accurate and time/cost effective. Experiments…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of animals in research is widely accepted, particularly within the scientific community. However, with the rise of new technologies and growing concern over animal welfare, the ethics of animal experimentation and the extent to which it is practiced has increasingly come into question. Although animal experimentation is regulated to prevent excessive suffering, opponents argue that these measures are insufficient. Proponents of animal research argue that knowledge gained from it and the various applications for it justify the unethical manner by which that knowledge is obtained. This argument neglects critical moral considerations rooted in deontology and utilitarianism which condemn the unethical use of animals for the advancement…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Viewpoints

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After studying multiple views on animal testing I have come to realize my personal view has now changed since the start of my research. Before undergoing heavy study into animal testing I believed that all types of animal testing should be stopped, but now I believe that the idea is very beneficial and should only be done when the rights of the animal are considered. In the coming years, hopefully, more regulations can be passed to ensure that all animal’s lives are protected during experimentation. Although most animals are treated with care and no pain is dealt to them when undergoing testing, it would be a lie if I stated no animals are harmed during the process. Animal testing is extremely useful in developing life-saving drugs and medicine.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Though I concede that in some situations, animal testing may be useful, such as in immensely important medical studies, I still maintain that it is unnecessary to make an animal suffer and be discriminated against. Although some people may think that animal testing is healthy and beneficial to humans, I believe that animal testing is unethical and utterly wrong because of the unfair repulsive treatment that animals receive from scientists. This topic is important because the world we live in is as much an animal 's world as it is a human’s world and right now humans are discriminating and enslaving…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal rights is an idea that non-human animals should be entitled to their own lives, and that they should be afforded similar consideration as human. I will argue that it is a better option for humans not to accept animal rights, and I will offer three reasons to support this claim. Firstly, Animal rights is limiting to the advancement in human health. Secondly, there are alternatives to accepting the Animal rights. Finally, Animal rights does not support animal control, which is important for sustaining ecosystems and the environment.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal research is the use of non-humans (animals) in experiments and tests. Many people argue that animals should or should not be used for animal research with a multitude of reasons to support each claim. By checking the Internet, one can see that animal research is a hot topic which leads to many heated discussions and arguments about animal research and whether it is right or wrong. However, with the usage of animals in research such as the field of medicine, it has many benefits not only to mankind, but to the animals themselves as many human and animal lives can be saved and extended through proper and thorough…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays