Constitutional Democracy: Gideon Vs. Wainwright

Improved Essays
A constitutional democracy, a governmental system that states the limitations of political figures and allows the removal of ineffective groups, is clearly depicted as beneficial during the case of Gideon v. Wainwright. With the preservation of freedom in mind, constitutional democracies provide individuals with the right to exercise the law in order to preserve the concept in which power belongs to the masses. In addition to allowing ramifications to laws and rules regarding governmental procedures, America’s constitutional democracy focuses on limiting the amount of power that is given to political figures.
A document protecting the rights of Americans, the Constitution enforces regulations in an effort to prevent the abuse of political power over minorities. When constitutional rights are believed to be ignored by government workers, victims hold the right to exercise their freedoms set forth by the Constitution, which is what was done by
…show more content…
Gideon. After having his request for a counsel refused by the trial judge, Gideon felt his constitutional rights were declined due to his economic background. Due to America’s implementation of a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He appeared in court without an attorney, but Gideon asked the court to appoint one for him. FL law only allowed counsel to be appointed for indigents when a defendant was charged with a capital crime. The court refused to appoint an attorney for him, and he was found guilty and sentenced to prison. Instead…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This crime was considered a felony in Florida. At the trial, Gideon appeared without an attorney. He requested for the judge to appoint one for him as he couldn’t afford one. However, the judge denied Gideon’s request as the law said that an attorney could only be appointed for capital offenses. After the trial, which Gideon represented himself, he was sentenced to 5 years in prison.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On January 15, 1963, a court case starts with Clarence Earl Gideon who has trusted a thief rebuked for breaking and entering a pool entryway and taking a little measure of money. Gideon wasn't given an attorney by the area of Florida and have secured himself after denied an interest for a free insight. Afterward, Gideon found that he was liable. Louie L. Wainwright, a Secretary of the Florida Division of Corrections was sued for habeas corpus by Gideon which his case made it to the Supreme Court where it was fought by Abe Fortas. He battled in toppling his conviction, held that the benefit to control, guaranteed in government trials by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, is fundamental to a sensible trial.…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lord Gideon Case Summary

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The court justify their verdict because of the sixth amendment that guarantee of counsel. It’s a basic right that is absolutely necessary to a fair trial that you should be appointed an attorney if you cannot afford one yourself. They based their decision on that Gideon's conviction was unconstitutional because he was denied a defense lawyer at trial. (Bright B., 2013) As a result of the decision he was given another trial with an appointed lawyer this time.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The facts about Gideon and Wainwright. Gideon had been charged with breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor, which is a felony. It was handled in the open court to help appoint counsel because he couldn’t afford an attorney. The trail judge had denied Gideon his request there for by Florida law so that only permitted for the counsel on poor defendants to be charged with capital offenses. He then represented himself he had made an opening statement to the jury that cross-examined his prosecution’s witness.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gideon V. Wainright Case

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gideon v. Wainright determined the constitutional right of counsel for the indigent. An indigent is a person without a sufficient income to afford a lawyer for defense in a criminal case. If the court finds a person an indigent, the court must appoint a public defender or other attorney to represent them (Hill). Indiana continues to rely heavily on the inherent authority of the courts to provide the mandated services. It is one of the few states that a willing employee of the judge may represent the accused.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Sixth amendment guarantees that “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” However, originally most people handled their own cases, though some sought the advice of the small pool of attorneys. Even when lawyers were present, they were only required to appear in court. Now, attorneys are required to be involved from the time the defendant is questioned by law enforcement. However, some people cannot afford to pay for an attorney to act in their best interest.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Gideon v. Wainwright, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the assistance of counsel was a fundamental right to those (in criminal trials) who could not afford one, and that it was essential to a fair trial and due process of law. The Constitutional Amendments at issue were the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. In 1961, Clarence Gideon was denied the right to counsel after being accused of breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor offense, which was a felony in the state of Florida. Without a proper legal defense, Gideon was found guilty and sentenced to five years of imprisonment.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution v. Tyranny The constitution is the Americans way to fight against tyranny. In 1787 when the constitution was written, the Americans wanted to protect the new nation from allowing one or few people from taking total power. This is known as tyranny.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gideon subsequently stood on trial for these charges, appearing in court without counsel. He requested that the court appoint him an attorney, in accordance with his right as stated by the Sixth Amendment. However, according to Florida state law, an attorney can only be appointed to a defendant in capital cases, and as a result the court did not appoint him one. Gideon represented himself and was later found guilty and was sentenced to five years in prison.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This next topic which many citizens are concerned about is what exactly the system of checks and balances is, we shall explain to the state what is, to better persuade you. The system of checks and balances and the Constitution’s clear delineation of the powers of the federal government will protect states’ rights and individual rights. This system we have come up with is will one day be considered the greatest piece of legislation ever created. We will have horizontal and vertical checks. These will in no doubt protect…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States Constitution is one of the shortest, longest standing, and most ambiguous constitutions in the world. This document establishes a democratic republic of many states under one federal government. In outlining the responsibilities and powers of each branch of the government and how they relate to state governments, many questions are left unanswered. Though this constitution outlines legislation’s role fairly clearly, it is far too vague concerning executive and judicial roles and the relationship between state and federal government.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argument Against Welfare Testing

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited

    University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law. (Vol. 15, Is. 5, pp. 1539-1559) Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=6b36aece-4bd5-4961-b371-ca7f92032795%40sessionmgr110&vid=2&hid=125 Martin, D. (2012, March 18).…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vega 1 Breanna Vega Professor Olmos English 101 23 April 2016 Citizens Rule Democracy is known to be a strong form of government, because it gives full power to the people of the nation. Many argue about how a democracy works, but do not understand it includes difficult tasks for it to be successful. In Cornel West’s reading, “The Deep Democratic Tradition in America,” the idea of a strong democracy is by the people, but the promise of a democracy has failed. In order to keep the promise of strong democracy individual practices such as voting rights, the principle of protection, and the representation of each individual must be practiced under no circumstances.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court does not possess the appropriate tools to implement their decisions. Courts cannot actively seek out appellants, appellants have to seek courts in order for their claims to be heard. The courts are described as the least dangerous branch of the government because the judiciary lacks the “influence over either the sword or the purse” (Rosenberg, 15). If the courts lack the political and elite support, the court’s decision will not be effective in its implementation; therefore, the decision will hold no power. Rosenberg argues that even if courts are characterized as producers of social change, it is a mere illusion.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays