Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study

Improved Essays
In Gideon v. Wainwright, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the assistance of counsel was a fundamental right to those (in criminal trials) who could not afford one, and that it was essential to a fair trial and due process of law. The Constitutional Amendments at issue were the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.

In 1961, Clarence Gideon was denied the right to counsel after being accused of breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor offense, which was a felony in the state of Florida. Without a proper legal defense, Gideon was found guilty and sentenced to five years of imprisonment. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court in a suit against Louie L. Wainwright (the Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections)

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Clarence Earl Gideon was pretty much a nobody. He had only culminated his studies up to the eighth grade and even ran away from home while he was still in middle school. As an adult he committed several nonviolent crimes and was sent to jail more than once. He was a drifter that spent a lot of time in and out of prisons until one day it caught up to him. One night Gideon was seen breaking and entering into a local Pool Room and stealing a couple of beers and money from a jukebox.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gideon v. Wainwright,372 U.S. 335 (1963) Parties: Plaintiff: State of Florida (the prosecutor) Defendant: Gideon Petitioner to the Florida Supreme Court: Gideon (on a writ of habeas corpus) Respondent to the Florida Supreme Court: State of Florida Petitioner to the United States Supreme Court: Gideon (on a writ of certiorari) Respondent to the United States Supreme Court: State of Florida History: Gideon was charged with a misdemeanor (B & E).…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He then filed for a writ of Habeas Corpus in Florida’s supreme court which promptly denied his petition. Failing the initial…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although evidence proves that Bob is guilty of the crime, he is protected under the 6th amendment to a right of counsel in a trial. Therefore, he must be assigned a public defender regardless if the evidence found at the scene of the crime proves him guilty. As presented in the Supreme Court case of Gideon V. Wainwright, the defendant Clarence Earl Gideon broke into a pool hall in Panama City Florida hall. He was accused of stealing beer, wine, and coins adding up to less than $50 (Cohen, 2013). At the trial Gideon announced to the judge that he was unable to afford a lawyer therefore requesting to be appointed by a counsel.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of US V. Curtiss

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people tend to wonder the actual power of the president. Is it just a title? Or is he secretly the most powerful man; much like a dictator? Well, by going back in time to specific court cases that could have swayed either way, one can easily tell that the president has more powers than everyone thinks. Many think that issues involving wars and foreign relations are solely powers given to the President, but these powers can be tested when problems occur that are not clearly stated in his job description.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lord Gideon Case Summary

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He argued that the trial court in Florida decision violated his rights of being appointed an attorney because he could afford one himself. “He first filled out a handwritten habeas corpus petition directly…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    ISSUE: Whether indigent defendants have a constitutional right to representation. Does the right to counsel in federal court, under the 6th Amendment, extend to the states under the…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gideon V. Wainright Case

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gideon v. Wainright determined the constitutional right of counsel for the indigent. An indigent is a person without a sufficient income to afford a lawyer for defense in a criminal case. If the court finds a person an indigent, the court must appoint a public defender or other attorney to represent them (Hill). Indiana continues to rely heavily on the inherent authority of the courts to provide the mandated services. It is one of the few states that a willing employee of the judge may represent the accused.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The respondent, Gerald Scarpelli, a felony probationer was arrested after committing a burglary. The respondent's probation was revoked without a hearing and he was not represented by counsel. He filed a petition for habeas corpus and the District Court concluded that revocation of probation without a hearing and without counsel was a denial of due process. The Court of Appeals affirmed.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There was a disagreement on whether or not the death penalty was a violation to the convicted person’s rights. The person under the death penalty was caught breaking into a private home when they were caught in the act. As the person tried to leave the scene, they tripped and fell causing the gun in their hand to fire a shot that unfortunately killed a resident in the home (Furman). From there, the lower leveled court found the person guilty and he was sentenced to death. Though the person was found guilty of murder, their lawyers didn’t believe they should have been convicted with the death penalty and had challenged to overturn the punishment to something less severe as the death penalty.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This case questioned the Sixth Amendment 's extension of the right to counsel in state criminal felony cases. In a 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court upheld the right to counsel and argued that it extended to all cases. Supreme Court Justice Tom C. Clark argued that the Constitution guarantees the right to counsel in order to protect due process. The Gideon v Wainwright case was as milestone decision in which the Constitution was interpreted very…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Dbq

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He then took it to the supreme court and…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    14th Amendment Essay

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nicolle Perez Wednesday 5:40 The fourteenth amendment was passed in 1963, which guaranteed legal counsel and legal representation to the defendants of criminal cases if they are not able to afford one. I would like to one day be one of these representatives. When the future arrives, I see myself as a criminal defense attorney in the state I live in at that current time. Once I accomplish my goals, I envision myself taking on cases that no one dares to tackle.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Selective Incorporation

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While the ideal example of a democracy places the decisions of government in citizen’s hands, the United States rarely does as such. For example, the Supreme Court, while influenced by public approval and public opinion, isolates itself from the media and public in two specific ways. Its Justices, appointed by the president, are indirect methods for people to get what they want from the highest branch of the Judiciary Branch. Similar to the method and processes used to elect a president through the Electoral College, the Supreme Court works in a way that places the power of the government in educated individuals’ hands as opposed to the direct power of votes in an election for a state governor. It indirectly allows people to influence Court…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this case, the right to counsel was indeed violated. An individual acting under the direction of law enforcement agents in this type of situation would result in a direct violation of another ’s 6th Amendment rights. The right to counsel also includes that a defendant has the right to a lawyer rather her or she is paid or court appointed in each phrase of the criminal proceeding, this includes from the initial arrest until the first appeal after the conviction. As our fellow classmates stated, if Nichols had contacted the FBI agents after receiving the incriminating information; Henry denied appeal would have never been reviewed.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays