Gideon V. Wainright Case

Improved Essays
Gideon v. Wainright determined the constitutional right of counsel for the indigent. An indigent is a person without a sufficient income to afford a lawyer for defense in a criminal case. If the court finds a person an indigent, the court must appoint a public defender or other attorney to represent them (Hill). Indiana continues to rely heavily on the inherent authority of the courts to provide the mandated services. It is one of the few states that a willing employee of the judge may represent the accused. Due to the suspicion and distrust of the criminal justice system and the counsel not being fully independent there are standards with the counsel has to meet Standards 5-1.3 provides the following (Standards 1-2):
(a) The legal representation

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On the 17th of December 1986, Olaf Dietrich arrived in Melbourne from a flight from Thailand and was charged the next day with four counts of drug trafficking. He was alleged to have swallowed 70 grams of heroin in small packets in attempt to smuggle them through customs. Olaf Dietrich was found, in his first trial, guilty by a jury of importing no less than a trafficable amount of heroin as pursuant to section 233B of the Customs Act of 1901. Dietrich at first alleged that the drugs had been planted by the police. He was found guilty of two other counts and sentenced in the Victorian County Court.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The instance of Mr. Gideon was conceded certiorari, and along these lines the instance of Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455, would be the integral component. On account of Betts, the litigant was arraigned for ransacking a bank, and hence asked for the avail of guidance to verbalize with him in court because of the way that he didn't have any mazuma. In the province where the offense transpired, it was not the act of the judges to delegate counsel for litigants unless the charge was assault or murder, so the solicitation was gainsaid. After the tribulation, where the litigant argued not blameworthy and set aside an ideal opportunity to verbalize with himself, he was discovered liable at a seat tribulation and sentenced to eight years in confinement. He petitioned for discharge by denotes of habeas corpus, referring to that he had been precluded the avail from claiming prosperous advice as required under the Fourteenth Amendment.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of US V. Curtiss

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people tend to wonder the actual power of the president. Is it just a title? Or is he secretly the most powerful man; much like a dictator? Well, by going back in time to specific court cases that could have swayed either way, one can easily tell that the president has more powers than everyone thinks. Many think that issues involving wars and foreign relations are solely powers given to the President, but these powers can be tested when problems occur that are not clearly stated in his job description.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lord Gideon Case Summary

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This case began in 1961 when a man named Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested. Clarence Earl Gideon was arrest for breaking into a Panama City in Florida. He entered a pool room and planned to steal money from the hall’s vending machines. He was charged in Florida State with a felony because he ended stealing from the vending machines. He did have a criminal back ground and was before in and out of prison but it wasn’t anything big he every committed.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case Gideon V. Wainwright the due process did not happen constitutional. The due process is the fair treatment through the normal judicial system. The source of the due process is under the Fifth Amendment that no one shall be “deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.” The reason why that this process applies to the fifty states as well as the federal government, that is prohibits the stats as well as the local government officials, from depriving a person of life, liberty or property without a legislative authorization.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sane Enough to Die Imagine a state of paranoia so great that it starts to seem as if one’s own thoughts are not their own, or auditory and visual hallucinations that continuously speak of the inferiority of the masses, creating an intense sense of superiority in oneself. Such experiences are just a few of the possible symptoms of schizophrenia, a fairly well recognized psychological disorder present in today’s society. Psychological disorders are an incredibly real issue in the modern world that do not receive nearly enough consideration and understanding. It is this issue of mental illness that creates much controversy and indecisiveness in establishing legal guidelines for determining mental competence in the eyes of the law. Specifically, the Supreme Court case of Ford versus (v) Wainwright attempted to establish the constitutionality of executing someone deemed psychologically unfit after the trial process, as well as adequate procedures for doing so.…

    • 1987 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the United States, the criminal justice system follows two unique diverse models that protect the people. One of these models is the Due Process Model and in this model, the rights of the defendant are equally and fairly treated. Which this process being the main objective of this clause. The second model is the Crime Control Model and in this model strict punishments to the defendant committing the crime be forced but also protecting the individual 's rights as well. Both these models have a different method in which they protect the individuals but have a similar focus.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout all of American history, no other document has maintained an equally important and ever changing role in our government than the United States Constitution. The Constitution drew the plans for the creation the three branches of government and provided the structure on which the national government would grow. The most famous aspect of the Constitution is the Bill of Rights. Written by James Madison as a response to the States’ demands that individual liberties be provided and protected, the Bill of Rights serves to establish the personal rights of every man in America. Among these rights are the right to counsel, which is preserved in the Sixth Amendment, and the right to not withstand or be subjected to cruel or unusual punishment,…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the founding of America, the founding fathers formed much of the structure that America is based on today. In the world today we still follow the same Federal System that the Americans did in the 1800’s. There have been many Supreme Court cases that have left an impact on our country, but none have left the impact that the Dred Scott versus Sanford decision left. In order to understand the Dred Scott versus Sanford case one must know: the function of the Supreme Courts , who Dred Scott was, and the impact that the case left on future presidents choosing their Supreme Court Justices. The Supreme Court was founded in 1789 because of the Judiciary Act of 1789.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How is it possible that a poor, uneducated man was able to change the law of the United States? As Clarence Earl Gideon was put on trial for breaking and entering, he remained adamant and relentless in his right to due process; more importantly, his right to a lawyer. After being forced to represent himself, Gideon pled not guilty, fought his way through the trial, and was still convicted. Gideon’s resilience would not let this be the end of his battle. He journeyed his way to the Supreme Court and stood up for what he felt was right.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Gideon's Trumpet

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gideon’s Trumpet In 1961, a case appeared to the United States Supreme Court that challenged a well-accepted precedent established by the court almost 20 years prior. The case being discussed in this book is Gideon vs Wainwright, in which the defendant is a fifty-one-year-old white man in Florida. Gideon was accused of petty larceny, and eventually found guilty in court. Gideon, though, was representing himself, as he could not afford an attorney and was never provided with one.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    History Of Dual Federalism

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. Chart the changes in federalism throughout American history. What was dual federalism? How was governmental power distributed under this system? How did the Great Depression lead to the decline in dual federalism?…

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1.Who is Amy Bach? —Why did she write this book? Amy Bach was a journalist who was very passionate and intrigued by criminal law and wanting to seek justice. Which lead her to attend law school to further her education. Once she completed her degree she became an author of the novel called Ordinary Injustice – How America Holds Court.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Perry Case

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After participating in and reviewing the Q.B trial R v. Perry & Manitoba in regards to the role of the investigator, and the physical evidence that was implemented in the trial, four individual pieces of physical evidence were introduced to the court by the investigator (cite). These four pieces of evidence consist of, a black wallet that was found on Matlock Manitoba, a time X watch found on Mason Perry, and a knife and a replica firearm found in a dumpster, in the back ally where Mason Perry and Matlock Manitoba were arrested. In relation to the introduction of evidence, the wallet, and Time X watch that supposedly belonged to Monty Hall was first introduced into court by the Crown during the testimony of Monty Hall, stating that his black wallet and Time X watch was stolen from him during the robbery. Additionally, they were shown to Hall asking how both compared to the ones that were stolen, then entered them into court as exhibit one and two. The physical evidence was then brought up once again when Constable York started his testimony, adding that Manitoba was in possession of the wallet and Perry of the Time X watch when found hiding in a bush within the back ally.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Study

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The prosecutors are considered to be the most influential actors within the courthouse, as they decide which case to prosecute, the cases to plea-bargain, and the case to try. The prosecutor may also influence the factors of setting bail and creating the sentence. In the United States Constitution, one’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel is granted as many defendants cannot afford to hire a lawyer, they are provided a public defender also known as the defense attorney. The defense attorneys encourage their clients to think about how the jury will assess them as guilty beyond reasonable doubt, therefore most will plead guilt. The judge plays a major authority role in the criminal justice system whether it is in state courts, or larger courts.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays