Comparing Rhetoric And Doubt-Talk

Improved Essays
What are ways that you want your speech to be truthful and virtuous?
Doubt-Talk – Speaking within the limits of Human Knowing. People would not know everything, something people are not even noticed that they are wrong. Therefore, doubt is important, “Doubting some of our own rhetoric helps us to be honest and accountable” (77). However, it is hard to stand on our own point when someone doubt us, but “We should not be afraid take a stand. Whenever we go beyond our control beliefs, however, we should check our sources. When in doubt, we should consider adding a phrase such as ‘it appears to me’ or ‘I could be mistaken.’ We just might be” (77).
On the other hand, I want my speech can present joy to audiences. Sometimes the topic may be too serious

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The effectiveness of a message delivered through public speaking depends greatly on the first impression the audience receives from the presenter himself. To accept a presenter’s argument requires for a certain type of trust to be established between the presenter and the audience. When given the opportunity by Durham University give a series of three-day lectures in 1943, CS Lewis first established to the audience his authority on the various subjects found through his discussion, such as moral value and human nature. But Lewis understood that his expertise alone would not be enough to convince the Durham audience to trust him and his message, so the beginning of his lectures also centered around sentiments which were relevant for the audience.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Schultze says “As servant speakers, we first should listen and dialogue with others to clarify what they ultimately believe. We then need to begin determining why, when, and how to use God-talk, which is believers’ foundation for big-picture truth. As we speak with others and listen to their responses, some of our views might change. We might especially refine our control beliefs, thereby making us wiser speakers in the future.” This helped me in learning that we really need a good background on your audience.…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elbow's Argument Analysis

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the traditional method of critical thinking, the goal is to find the right answer by discovering and ferreting out the wrong answers. Thus, in a multiple choice quiz, a student could determine that the correct answer was C by knowing that A, B, and D were incorrect. This student knows that, as Sherlock Holmes said, “When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.” To me, this quote sums up the premise of what Elbow refers to as the doubting game. Once all untrue assertions have been eliminated, what remains is presumed true.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rhetoric is the act of persuasive speech or writing involving the use of knowledge and figurative language to make a specific form and function of speech or writing that would best fit a person’s goal in convincing their audience. For example, you are watching your favorite TV show and the TV show goes straight too commercial. The commercial’s objective is to give awareness on smoking, which portrays cigarettes as monsters containing over 7000 chemicals. The commercial is using symbolism by representing cigarettes as noxious monsters to alarm minors and smokers how critical smoking…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There has always been two driving forces in our culture, doubt and faith. The novel, A Prayer for Owen Meany by John Irving, tackles the ceaseless debate if doubt can exist alongside faith, to convey this message Irving implores two diverse characters. Owen Meany, an extremely faithful follower of Christ, and Johnny Wheelwright who is doubtful of the supernatural forces that Owen believes. However, both characters have transgressions against established systems in society. While faith and doubt are on opposite sides of the spectrum, Owen and Johnny are able to have a blooming friendship that eventually allows Johnny to grow his faith through Owen.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Herrick (2005) stated that the main characters of rhetorical discourse which include designed, appeal to a spectator, shaped by the motives of individuals, respond suitably to a condition, looking for persuasion, and pay attention to possible problems. Through rhetorical analysis, this essay will examine two sentences, demonstrate how cultural context affect the style and method of sentences. To compare the two sentences, this task will also analysis their rhetorical situation, discuss the rhetorical devices and appeals, explain the style, method, and structure of each sentence. The Sentences Sentence one “If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible; who still wonders if the dream…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetoric In Policy Making

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When it comes to Asen, he had a different but similar spin on the topic of public policy. Based on a very significant quote from this article, According to Asen (2010) “Rhetoric thus acts as a powerful but not an unconstrained force in policymaking. Individual participants in policy debates make choices in framing Policies, affirming and denying values, representing target populations, inviting or discouraging wider agency, and other areas, but the participation of other advocates, the judgment of audiences, the social force of discourse, and multiple material considerations constrain these choices.” Looking at and analysis both the quote and the general article in general, Asen is alluding to the idea that public policy can both be a catalyst…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rhetoric Definitions

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Rhetoric is a form of persuasive speaking or writing with occasionally the use of figures and other compositional techniques. It’s a language designed to have a persuasive or impressive effect on its audience. 2. “One should eat to live, not live to eat.”…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does People have free will to decide what they need in this lifetime or does rhetoric decide for mankind? Rhetoric for thousands of years has been the mind regulator when it comes to purchasing goods. According, to Aristotle rhetoric, is "the art of persuasion", that doesn't follow a set of rules likes other disciplines of the Arts. The definitions rhetoric opens to change when a spectator interprets the message.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Suu Kyi used in her speech. Firstly, she constantly reassured the audience that she was speaking honestly. Before sharing her thoughts, she would use phrases like, “Therefore I shall speak my mind” and “Let me speak frankly.” (“Women in World History.” )…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rhetoric Speech-Making

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Pages

    As we research through the time periods there seems to be a reflection of societal belief systems on not only rhetoric study and how speech makers present their message but also the function of the audience. Progressing from ancient Greek times where Aristotle felt that listeners were dishonest to the postmodernist theories on individual perceptions. The thought that oratory one-sided perspective has been the emphasis in rhetoric there needs to be more research related to why the audience has a reaction or opinions developed from the message and orator.…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosopher’s musings or debates can sometimes in fact span decades. One such philosopher’s debate is the relationship between doubt and certainty. William Lyon Phelps believed that with certainty you could accomplish almost anything. On the other hand and a stark contrast to Phelps, Bertrand Russell was of the sound mind that no one should be certain of anything, even their own opinions. While both intelligent minds bring up good points in their own respective way, both fail to recognize the complex, intricate system that makes up the human mind.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To confirm the the speaker’s “reliability,” one often raises the question: “how do you know” (Austin 86). The questioner, in doubting the truthfulness of the statement, asks the speaker to elaborate upon his “credentials” and to “detail [his facts]” (Austin 86). In addition, one also raises questions concerning the “reality” and “certitude” of the speaker’s statements (Austin 86). The questions that relate to whether the reality exists may be formulated as “do you know it’s a real goldfinch?…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Ivan Joseph’s speech he presented at TEDXRyersonU, displays many of the key fundaments of public speaking. By analyzing the organization of this speech, his physical and vocal attributes, and his appeals to the audience, one will be able to why his speech was so effective and enjoyable. Dr. Ivan Joseph is a former athletic director at a major university and through his TED talk, he explains how to be confident and build a better you. He breaks his speech down into four main points self-confidence, self-talk, positive reinforcement, and how to interpret feedback to make it useful to you.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays