Comparing Rene Descartes And God's Existence

Improved Essays
KNOWLEDGE OF REALITY

how we can know what is real. What grounds or guarantees what we think is certain in the world?, it is important that: (i) you spell out carefully what the thinker’s view are; (ii) think of some criticisms of this view; (iii) tell me what you think. What is your judgment and position toward the theory? Do you think it is right or wrong? Why? If you picked two views, is there a way to somehow synthesize them or do you clearly prefer one over the other?

Descartes and God's Existence

Rene Descartes is one of the most sophisticated writers of philosophy. He is also one of the most important of the western philosophers due to his determination to find a certain foundation for philosophy and the truth that could not be assaulted
…show more content…
From it being a thought and its results of everything he has doubted. Descartes believes that he is not a perfect ‘human being.’ Descartes looks at all the different places where he has learned to do everything and the things that have to exceed the expectations of being perfect than Descartes. Descartes believes that something that is perfect cannot be followed or be depended upon due to it being perfect. The idea of perfectness was given to Descartes upon the nature of the source that was way more than perfect than him. The nature had everything itself of perfection. What had all the ideas, that is God. However, if Descartes was doing all of this alone than he would have not being able to, due to him being independent. Descartes would have everything that he lacks. For an example it being eternal, infinite and unchanging. Then Descartes would be perfect just like God. Since Descartes is not perfect, he depends on God, someone who is way more than perfection. Anything that was not perfect in Descartes eyes; was perfect in Gods. From there, Descartes knew that uncertainty and inconsistency were the things in him and not God. Since Descartes needed two proofs of God’s existence so people would believe in at least one of his God’s belief, knowing that God exists by believing at least one of belief. But, if Descartes gets good proof for his belief in God, than he …show more content…
Descartes owns an ability of judgment that he has attained from God. Since God does not deceive Descartes, Descartes cannot make any mistake, if he uses the God’s given judgment the right way. Though, Descartes believes that if everything came form God, than God will not allow him to go wrong in any way. However, if Descartes takes his mind of God and just thinks about himself, then there can be an error or many. God creates Descartes, but there is also something of not being. But, Descartes believes that he is in the middle of these two. If Descartes does something of not being, than he will make an error and not go the right way. Error is something that one is responsible for itself and not God. The idea of judging is imponderable, so Descartes does make mistakes but not because of God who has given this idea. Making a judgment of the things Descartes really does not know about or wants to know of not making any error. Error is denial or lack of knowledge that is always with Descartes. The error lies on the concurrent of the two

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Descartes reality principle asserts that the reality of the cause is at least as great as the reality of the effect and is what brings about Descartes first proof of the existence of God. Understanding the word “God” to mean some infinite substance, a supremely intelligent being is a part of his essence. According to Descartes, the cause of this idea could only be something with infinite substance. This also means that God cannot be a deceiver as fraud and deception are defects and it a contradiction; it is impossible for a perfect being to have defects. Thus, “It is impossible that God would ever deceive me” (Descartes).…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will then proceed to analyze the third meditation in which Descartes focuses on a causal argument for existence of God who is perfect. By the end of the third meditation, Descartes appears to prove that he is not God and that God exists. Descartes knows that he exists by the very fact of “cogito”. He cannot doubt that he exists because something cannot doubt or have awareness and not exist.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will outline two related skeptical arguments made by Montaigne, explicate them, and then provide Descartes response to these arguments, followed by a brief examination to determine which argument hold more persuasive power. I will begin by outlining two arguments presented by Montaigne, and then expand upon them to better explain their meaning and significance. The first argument I will discuss is the seventh argument presented by Montaigne in his work on skepticism, and proceeds as follows; “To judge appearances that we receive from subjects, we would need a judicatory instrument; to verify that instrument, we would need demonstration; to verify the demonstration, an instrument; here we are going round in a circle. Since the senses cannot…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes thoughts of “I think therefore I am” often disputes the idea of a god or divine being, which ultimately shatters the idea of immortality. His idea often holds individuals responsible for their own actions, that they cannot blame a divine being for their mistakes. Descartes’ idea of agency challenges the religious standpoint of a god, because nothing, from Descartes’ perspective may or may not exist. Descartes questions often shake the idea of a religion and hold people responsible for their actions, rather than have a scapegoat through religion. Descartes often creates doubt within the need of divine…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The third argument against Descartes’ successful refutation is that he admits throughout his meditations that he can in fact be deceived, which means there is no way for him to refute the first meditation in and of itself as explained by the dream argument. “From these considerations it is utterly apparent that, notwithstanding the immense goodness of God, the nature of man, insofar as it is composed of mind and body, cannot help being sometimes mistaken” (140). This statement recognizes that he is capable of mistakes, which encompasses many possibilities but most importantly the fact that his senses may not be absolutely true, thus theorizing something that is false, which proves the necessity of his first meditation. One’s senses cannot be…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the third Meditation, René Descartes aims to offer an argument for the existence of God, based simply on what he knows with certainty. In this, he reviews his doubts, what he knows for certain, and what he no longer doubts. While arguing the existence of God, Descartes explores God as a possible deceiver, his capacity to overcome this doubt in God’s goodness through formal and objective realities, and how effects supremely rely on their ultimate cause. Through his various claims and objections, Descartes establishes a relationship between a finite idea or event and its infinite cause to prove that God is a perfect being by himself that placed innate ideas of his existence in our thoughts. Before he begins his argument for the existence…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes describes God as “infinite, eternal, immutable, all-knowing, all-powerful, and in short could have had all the perfections that [Descartes] could discern to be in God (35). Perfect, in this sense, means without flaws. God is the best example for perfection because God could simply be described as perfection. Descartes lives in a time where the people around him are predominantly Christian, and Descartes, though he never outright claims to be Christian, most likely believes in or knows about the Christian God and is referring to him in his Discourse on Method as perfection. God, according to Christianity, is flawless so Descartes is claiming perfect means flawless by associating the word perfect with a flawless…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At the beginning of his fourth meditation, Descartes begins reflecting on the three main certainties that he has developed so far: 1) that God exists, 2) that God is not a deceiver, and 3) that God created him and is therefore responsible for all his faculties, including his faculty of judgment. Descartes seems satisfied with the first two convictions, however, he begins to explore the conflict that arises with the third; that, “if everything that is in me comes from God, and he did not endow me with a faculty for making mistakes, it appears that I can never go wrong” (Descartes and Cottingham 38). This dilemma, also known as the “Problem of Error”, prompts the need for Descartes to reconcile the two, seemingly contradictory positions. While…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The belief of the problem of error is that god is omnipotent, god is all knowing, god is perfectly good but you can’t deny that evil exists. Descartes belief is sort of the same that god is omnipotent, god is all knowing, and god is perfectly good but instead of stating that evil exists he states that error exists and he proves that god is not the creator of evil. With that in mind people still had their critics saying, “if god were all good would he want us to make mistakes” or “if god were all powerful wouldn’t he make it that there is no evil. So therefore, Descartes is going to try to prove that we make mistakes and god is still powerful and all knowing.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second, I will present Descartes’s first proof for the existence of God in the third meditation, and in the process present the steps clearly and distinctly, exactly as Descartes understands them. Thus, Descartes cannot be making a mistake when he proves the existence of God. Descartes argument for making mistakes in his third meditation in Meditation on First Philosophy is that human beings can make errors, even though God gave them perfect faculties. These mistakes are caused by our own will or free choice, which has a much broader scope…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes the father of modern philosophy, a philosopher known to believe things to be true until it was proven otherwise. In these meditations Descartes had complex opinions. In the case of Descartes in meditations a greater individual than him existed. Descartes’ claim insisted with the existence of the idea of God to the real existence of God. To support his argumentative opinions, Descartes points two distinct arguments that were utilized by “Augustine in the fourth century and Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century” (Shouler).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He establishes that he is included in the category of finite beings. Because of the relationship he established between formal reality and objective reality, he concludes that he and can conceive of other ideas outside of himself because they are finite as well. With this same reasoning, he should not be able to conceive of something infinite—such as God--because he is finite. This leads him to believe that the idea of God is an innate idea—an idea we have by nature. Once Descartes establishes his innate understanding of God, he searches for the possible cause of his idea.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Descartes, even God himself was a matter of…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes states that because of this we must break down everything we know and find a base to our knowledge, an unquestionable principal. He continues on to say that because of this we should not trust anything that has previously deceived us and consider what we hold to be true by this. Descartes says that there are many ways that our senses that provide impressions, as Hume would put it, will deceive us. For example, because man has the ability to dream while a sleep, how is that we know we are awake this very second. The same goes for our sight; from far away we may think there is water in the distance on a very hot day but as we get closer we realize that our visual sense have mislead us.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays