Comparing Kant's View Of Justice And Decision-Making

Improved Essays
I believe there are no final answers in philosophy, just suggestions. The philosophical views of justice are suggestions on what that particular philosopher believes human life should follow, but most of the time there is no solid evidence supporting that idea. As a student nurse we take a holistic view while taking care of patients. We customize treatment to each individual regarding his or her mind, body and spirit. We look at all factors contributing to a patients care; such as social status, culture, values etc.
Philosophers such as Kant believe that the environment is not a factor in every day decision-making. Kant believes a man makes a decision for the sole purpose of doing the right thing. He states, “a good will is not good because

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What is justice? It is such a simple question yet such a hard thing to describe. However, the book Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction tries to explain it to us in a more simplified way. In the book the author Frank Schmalleger defines Justice as the principal of fairness and the ideal of moral equity. In other words, it is the act of giving each individual a fair an equal chance but I think there is more to justice than fairness and equality.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Justice ? You may think you know, but Justice has many meanings in society. Everyone can have their own personal definition or meanings to justice. In my opinion, justice is when there is equal fairness in a situation in which there wasn’t before. Another way I look at justice is avenging yourself or avenging someone when you felt someone has been doing wrong towards you or someone else.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is not a "true" definition of justice and there will never be a totally correct definition either. The word just means acting or doing something based on your morals and ethics. Because the definition of just can take many forms, so can justice. To understand justice, yo have to understand how to be just. What people consider just evolves with time.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If Justice is the idea of treating people fairly, then it is sensible to question what it means to be fair. Some say that justice is not viable in civilization. People are born with various capacities for evil and into various circumstances. People are judged by the public based on things that they cannot control: skin color, appearance, gender, etc and treated…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If there is justice exists as Socrates suggests, which is one good that bedding in our potential nature. Then we shall never define it with exact meaning. Because once it is defined, the injustice will follow along, and such “justice” will not be good in itself nor will the consequence it brings along be good either. Just as what Chuang tzu once said, “ Until the sage is dead, great thieves will never cease to appear, and if you pile on more sages in hopes of bringing the world to order, you will only be piling up more profit for Robber Chih.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice is a concept that is hard to define. It is often defined by laws that society must follow, and everyone believes that it they are broken that person is a criminal. That is not always the case though. Sometimes if a law is unjust the only option is to break it to achieve true justice. That is the only way that change can happen.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Shawshank Redemption (1994) Essential Questions: How does having a belief (in something or someone) help us to conquer fear and keep hope alive? -When you have something to hold on to, to live for it gives you strength to do whatever you want to do. Is rehabilitation possible? Are we obliged (as a society) to rehabilitate criminals?…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Justice is something that everyone in this world desires to have. By having justice everything in the world must be going right, but there is also injustice which sometimes is wrongly received. Nobody gets to choose if you get to live a good or bad life that is up to you. In this novel of Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein creates a creature or monster as it’s said in the book.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s belief on the right of punishment is grand and far reaching. To him, the right of punishment is a supreme power of the government. The government has only the right to punish those who have committed a crime; no punishment may be ordered “merely as a means for promoting another Good” of society or an individual (355). Punishing an innocent man breaches the principles of justice; only criminals (of both private and public crimes) are to be punished. Kant warns us that the Penal Law is a categorical imperative—it is unconditional and non-circumstantial.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While walking down the side of the road, you come across a person who seems to have tattered clothing, an unbathed demeanor, holding a sign that says “Anything Helps”. Does one have a moral obligation to help this person, or is it out of our scope of moral obligation? This difference between moral obligation differs between Utilitarianism and the Kantian approach. According to the Utilitarian theory of moral obligation, their duty is to do what will bring the most good and resolve the most amount of pain. Simply put, whatever would bring the most amount of happiness to the most amount of people is morally good.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will discuss the utilitarian and Kantian ideas on how they relate to the “trolley” problem scenario one and two. When a person is placed in scenario one a utilitarian would say the morally right thing to do is pull the lever to ensure only one person is killed and the five other lives are spared. Although you as the person and the family of the one person killed may suffer sadness. It is less suffering then you as the person and five other family and friends suffering. Scenario two is quite similar except for one major difference being that you as the person has to physically push a person off a bridge to stop the train from killing five others.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice is a term that people use to describe as an act or behavior that represents the good people present to others and themselves. It serves as a moral high ground that people strive to be, although sometimes these thoughts can be twisted into its opposite and cause pain, anger, and other negative emotions and acts arise within people. This pain erupts into what is known as injustice and is the epitome of what people should not strive for due it bringing so much negativity. It is a moral choice that no one what’s to make due to the label that it puts on them making them into monsters in the eyes of others due to what they believe could have been done. Although, in some cases, injustice is sometimes the best choice in the matter if one is…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Problem set 2 1.) What, according to the theory developed by Glaucon in Republic II, is justice? Why and in what sense is it good to be just person, and bad to be an unjust person? According to the theory developed by Glaucon, justice is the case where people agreed to be good to each other, so that not to end up in a chaos.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In other words, all individuals must uphold an unconditional good, to do this, one must be a rational person. A key factor relating to Kant’s theory, is that an individual may not interfere with another’s’ goals or objectives that a person may have. In addition, Kant discusses the moral rules that all autonomous and rational…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant’s theory of good will could say we should not base our actions off of what produces the most utility for ourselves in fact we should not even focus on ourselves we should focus on the moral duty that we all have. We could hate doing our moral duties; however, it is our moral duty to complete these…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays