Compare And Contrast State And Federal Court Frameworks

Decent Essays
The United States Court framework is a hierarchy system of various courts which, at first look, can seem to be confusing. There is, in fact, a straightforward system to how the courts are organized. Each state and federal court framework separated into a few layers, as depicted below.

Courts of Special Jurisdiction

These courts are set only to hear particular kinds of cases. The federal framework has bankruptcy and assessment courts, while most state frameworks have probate, which handles wills; family court, which regulates divorce, authority, and other related procedures, and a few others. A significant number of these courts have methods intended to speed up the procedure, and a considerable amount of the judges, attorneys, and managerial

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Federal Court system has three levels: the District Courts, the Courts of Appeal and the Supreme Court. NV judges are elected by the people. In contrast, federal judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The election of judges in NV creates a conflict of interest with the public in whom they sit in judgment. Judges must raise money in order to fund their election.…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION This essay examines the Australian court hierarchy, and the extension power the High Court attains as it has the ability too overturn decisions made by the Supreme Court. As it is the final court of appeal therefore reintegrates the point that the power of appointment is held within the body of the High Court. As the Australian Federal system consists of national court and a court system for each individual state and the two territories.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assignment Two: State Court Survey In Arizona, the majority of cities and towns have a municipal court which is sometimes also called city or magistrate court. This court hears misdemeanor and petty offense violations within their town or city. City or town magistrates preside over some criminal and civil traffic cases. Criminal traffic cases with no serious injuries and civil traffic cases that involve violations of city ordinances. They have the ability to issue Orders of Protection and search warrants.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States adopted the English Common Law and court structure in the early day there were quarter sessions courts and surrogate courts. America was a frontier country, and each colony adapted differently. This all changed during the Constitutional Convention the decision was the separate the federal court and the state court known as the dual court system. Even in today’s society, we are under that same dual court system. A parallel system of criminal justice was formed with this.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discuss the dual court system in the United States, and the structure of the federal court system, and your home state court system. The structure of the American court system has been viewed as complex and confusing as federal and state courts differ in jurisdiction, and types of cases that can be handled at the many different levels. The Supreme Court is the ultimate decision maker in cases that has been appealed regarding decisions made at the lower level of federal and state Supreme Courts. The dual court system operates within the boundaries of the state and federal court systems.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dynamic Vs Dynamic Court

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Dynamic v. Constrained Courts When it comes to the American court system, there are two predominant but opposing viewpoints: the constrained and the dynamic court views. While both views relate to the power the court system holds, the constrained view takes the stance that the court’s power is limited, while the…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are only two states in the U. S. with a bifurcated courts system, which means two separate high courts, one for civil matters and one for criminal appeals. In the state of Texas, there is the Texas Supreme Court and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. In this paper, it will be explained why these two courts are in place, what role they play in the courts system, and what service they provide. The Texas Supreme Court is in place in order to have the last word over civil matters arising from the lower courts in the state of Texas.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) Legal 2) Attitudinal 3) Strategic With the vague words of the constitution and these 3 models this is how the Supreme Court justices are to make decisions. 1) The legal aspect of the decision-making is strictly based on the facts, laws & precedent.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest federal court in America. The court consists of The Chief Justice of the U.S. with eight associate judges all nominated by the President of the U.S. They evaluate laws according to and try cases pertaining to the Constitution. The hierarchy under the U.S. Supreme Court is Appellate Courts, Trial Courts, and Federal Courts and boards outside of the Judicial Branch. The Supreme Court rules whether or not it is permitted under the Constitution.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States, the court system judicial authority is shared between the levels of government. Today, the Texas Constitution lacks power in people, campaign contributions, lack of minority representation on the bench, perceptions of fairness, and lack of knowledge on the part of the voters. Due to lack of these powers, people distrust the changes that could give the government even more power. Thought the states in United States, the Texas judiciary is among the most complicated and confusing systems. Courts are expected by the country to act in nonpolitical ways, focus on the wishes of the electorate, focus on justice, and give the fair and right judgment for the citizens.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Small Claims Court Essay

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The article of the Small Claims Court was an article that dissected what television shows like Judge Judy does to the general public and beyond. This article focused on juries that were in Manhattan, the District of Columbia and Hackensack, New Jersey. However, it would have been interesting for the article to have polled other cities that were not in the northeast of the United States. I believe that if they would had used more different regions in the study, it could have been more complete and perhaps different, given that the study could have found more detailed, thorough findings. The reason it may be different in other regions in the United States is, since some other people may not have watched shows like Judge Judy or they…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federal versus State governments hasn’t been equal since the writing of the Constitution and is still going on present day. The state and Federal governments have been affecting lives since the beginning. The constitution granted the Federal government with more superior powers, while the state governments have the lower side of powers compared to the federal. There has been a court case which reduced the states powers, Such as in Sturges v. Crownshield, where the chief justice John Marshall let the states pass bankruptcy laws but couldn’t be applied to debts brought upon oneself before the ratification of the law. John Marshall had many cases which reduced the power of the states.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Australia's court system consists of various courts at both federal, state and territory levels, with the High Court of Australia being the highest court in the judicial system. The three main courts at state/territory level are the Local Court, District Court and Supreme Court. The Local Court deals with committal criminal hearings, as well as civil cases with a monetary value of up to $100,000. The Children's Court and the Coroner's court also reside on this local level. The District Court has appellate jurisdiction and deals with more serious criminal cases, as well as civil cases with a monetary value of up to $750,000.…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case study, State v. Selalla (2008), involves Kevin Ballesillo Selalla (Selalla) who was charged in South Dakota on 27 July 2005 for drug possession, drug dealing intent and assuming fake identities intended to mislead law enforcement. Prior to the trial, Selalla claimed having limited knowledge of English and in response, the trial court hired a Spanish/English interpreter to assist Selalla. However, the Public Defender’s office took liberty in hiring another interpreter to facilitate communication between the defense counsel and Selalla. The trial court then dismissed the interpreter it had hired citing that retaining more than one publicly-funded interpreter is unwarranted. This analysis seeks to examine the role and administration of courtroom interpreters.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Selective Incorporation

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While the ideal example of a democracy places the decisions of government in citizen’s hands, the United States rarely does as such. For example, the Supreme Court, while influenced by public approval and public opinion, isolates itself from the media and public in two specific ways. Its Justices, appointed by the president, are indirect methods for people to get what they want from the highest branch of the Judiciary Branch. Similar to the method and processes used to elect a president through the Electoral College, the Supreme Court works in a way that places the power of the government in educated individuals’ hands as opposed to the direct power of votes in an election for a state governor. It indirectly allows people to influence Court…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays