Arguments Against Cloning

Amazing Essays
Chiyane Peterson The Internet of Philosophy is a website that contains, a series of articles listed with sufficient amounts of information under every letter in the alphabet. The articles go all the way from different philosophers to philosophy topics spoken about over the years. Each article covers an abundance of information on the philosopher or the topic. For example, a topic written on the website is an article about cloning. Cloning is a very popular topic that has been in many discussions over the years, it dates way back to the 1800’s.The article on cloning goes into depth about the history, types and arguments between for cloning and against cloning as well.
First, the article talks about the history of cloning with mammals. In
…show more content…
The positive arguments to cloning are having a genetically related child, cloning and savior siblings, cloning to replace a “deceased” child and the loss of therapeutic cloning through SCNT. For couples who are unable to procreate through contraception, would enjoy the chance to be able to clone to have a genetically related child. It can be an idea for if the mother, father or even both are unable to procreate to have a child. Including if a single mother or homosexual couple wanted to have a child they would be able to. Cloning and Savior Siblings is an argument that is not fairly new to conceive another child to use the organs or bodily fluids to save an older child from illness or death. The new piece about it is cloning the child to have be genetically identical, if cloning is permitted then there would be more useful means to creating a savior sibling. Even though, having a new child is highly respected; the means of removing anything from the body is under their contsent. Cloning to replace a “deceased” child argument came from a grieving parent, whom 11 month year old son passed away after having heart surgery. In the argument it is stated that “Even If It Worked, Cloning Won’t Bring Her Back”, even if that is the case it is said that it would be able to help grieving parents for the child they once had then lost. It could be categorized as morally …show more content…
These arguments follow such as the right to an open future, the right to a unique genetic identity, cloning is wrong because it 's “playing God” or “unnatural”, the dangers of cloning, cloning entailing or changing children into designer children or commodities, and cloning and uncertainty of familial roles. The right to an open future and unique genetic identity fairly go hand in hand, this is because both involve the children losing a sense of themselves and not feeling that they will have entitlement to their own lives. An open future involves them expected to be exactly like the other child, then that child would be deprived of his or her future as their own self. A unique identity is the pure fact that every human is born with uniqueness and dignity; if there is an exact replica of a person with the same genetic identity then that will take away from his or her uniqueness as a child. Cloning is wrong because it’s “playing God” or “unnatural” argument is from being stated that it is morally wrong because it oversteps the boundaries that are set either by God or nature. If it is not a procreation of something naturally made then it is an infraction. The dangers of cloning is a fear that the cloned child would suffer from genetic defects or result in a high number of defective embryos before one healthy one is developed. Even Dolly’s creator turned down human

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    However, this is not the case. Cloning only passes along the genes of an individual, not their experiences (Pence). Because of this, the clone and the original will not necessarily have the same personalities. When parents and those around the clone see that the child is not like the person who was copied, they may be disappointed. This will only further fuel the child’s feelings of inadequateness.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Essay On Gene Editing

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is wrong for parents and scientists to play God, except in the instance it could save the child from suffering. Now that scientists have successfully modified human embryos, the debates is on if human germline editing, changing the genetic code of future descendants, is an ethical thing to do. People say it is unnatural, but so are antibiotics and modern medicine. Another argument against gene editing is that it is changing the next generation without their consent, which is an awful argument because they cannot consent if they do not exist. The more time…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Yes, having a child through cloning, surrogacy or invitro is a different form of reproduction, but that does not mean that it is wrong. Plus, these non-traditional methods of reproduction allow couples or women to have the biological children they may not be able to have naturally (2) The belief that a cloned child would not have their own individuality. The fact that Kass, who I would guess to be educated believes this, shows in my opinion his ignorance and bias on the subject. I will be open minded enough to give him the benefit of having a lack of knowledge because his paper was written in 1997 and there have been a number of changes in the scientific community that he would not have been aware of. The thing is just because two people share the same genetic coding does not mean that the DNA coding both people manifest in the same way.…

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Being that one objection is clear to me at the time. In this debate, you can think of choosing a deaf embryo is wrong but wanting a child different from you. In K&S detrimental difference they would say it would be wrong to cause a deaf fetus or child to hear, or even to remove an intellectual and body disability. The mere difference can allow that it is much worse to change a person in a way to make them discriminate each other and be racist or prejudice. So more of K&S would question the natural process of being deaf like Lichy, and his wife is death.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mr. Krimsky argued in support that genetic modification should be prohibited which I would have to agree with. Although, being able to remove any gene that would hold an inherited disease from either the mother or father is a very astonishing, altering with other enhancements such as heightened intelligence, strength, and etc. just doesn't sound right to me. In my opinion, a child is a gift to the parents and it shouldn't be altered with. They should love it anyway or form it comes in.…

    • 2267 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Designer babies can lead to biologically based inequalities, the relationship between parent-child being strained, and it can be dangerous for the child. The “natural” way, sexual reproduction, of making a child allows mutations to occur in the DNA. Not all mutations are bad, rather some of them can be advantageous and disadvantageous mutations will be eliminated by apoptosis. Sexual reproduction allows the baby to hold unique qualities, whereas the designer babies will lack the unique qualities since the parents want their baby to be perfect. This means that the parents want their babies to be intelligent, a great athlete, and good-looking, in return losing certain unique characteristics.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In fact, they think it is a better option for children and their parents. They can choose an embryo that is not going to be affected by a certain gene and then their child will not have a specific disease, but that does not make up for the fact that one of the embryos just gets thrown away. Also when someone changes the genes to avoid a disease there is always a possibility that the gene pools gets messed up. Overall, there are more cons in the situation than pros and “designer babies” are not worth the risk. Some people are not able to have children for medical reasons so they have to look into In Vitro Fertilization for further help, but “designer babies” are going farther than that.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I stand on the line of it won’t work and even if it does it shouldn’t be allowed. It’s basically stealing one 's identity. Most importantly, it defies nature preventing the genetic differences that occur within a species to take place allowing it to survive. In many cases like the one from the article “The Cloning Controversy” “Opponents called for a ban on human cloning research, arguing that cloning offers few benefits to science while requiring unacceptable risks and undermining our very concept of humanness.” Readers can clearly take away that our humanness comes from our natural births and our individuality. Who are we to take away that right to our uniqueness?…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Genetic screenings allow parents to make the decision on preventing the birth of a disabled child through abortion. Opponents, however, view this argument as a misrepresentation of a parent’s duty to a child. “Good” parenting is not based on altering a child’s future. Rather, it is focused on loving the child, regardless of disability. Reducing the likelihood of having a child with disabilities reflects an “inappropriate attitude towards parenthood” (Malek, 2013, p. 59).…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I would not know if the things I like are because of who I really am, or because I have been artificially modified. I can understand that parents want the best for their children, but there are limits. The desire to control life and its outcomes go against the essence of life, and ultimately, against individual freedom and responsible parenting. The simple fact that this technology will become possible in the future to those who want to determine specific aspects of their child’s personality, is scary and unpromising. I would clearly draw a line between the use of this technology for screening embryos that have serious inherited diseases, and its use for nonmedical and frivolous reasons.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics