Though there is a public opinion on the matter of climate change it is mainly driven by scientists and politicians which can influence the development of laws and social action. Dualistically looking at these positions can help us find a way to link them together and reduce the conflict that is associated with them. It requires balancing the pros and cons of dualism and monism, and assessing when which view is most beneficial within a given situation. Realistically there will be times where monism is a better way to think or things, and vice versa with dualism. The goal is to be able to identify situations that requires human interventions and what situation require us to step back and let the ecosystem function as it always has. This systemization of monism may contradict the aspects in which contains, but what I am implementing is that we should be able to switch between the dualism and monism dualistically, because if we limit ourselves to only one way of thinking we lose our understanding of the other which may be a better alternative within a given situation. An example of this would be if we ourselves monastically within the world as being no better nor any less than nature we can observe what processes are occurring by including ourselves in the process of environmental maintenance. Once we have a full understand of the an ecological process we can find a way to incorporate ourselves within its prosperity, but this can only happen if we understand that our actions upon that given ecosystem can have a negative side effect in which we did not anticipate. On the other hand we could see that the given action is beneficial to the environment, and what we need to understand is that our actions, natural or not, have an influence on what is around us. The spectrum of our existence is a matter of where we are at within the plane of when we should be
Though there is a public opinion on the matter of climate change it is mainly driven by scientists and politicians which can influence the development of laws and social action. Dualistically looking at these positions can help us find a way to link them together and reduce the conflict that is associated with them. It requires balancing the pros and cons of dualism and monism, and assessing when which view is most beneficial within a given situation. Realistically there will be times where monism is a better way to think or things, and vice versa with dualism. The goal is to be able to identify situations that requires human interventions and what situation require us to step back and let the ecosystem function as it always has. This systemization of monism may contradict the aspects in which contains, but what I am implementing is that we should be able to switch between the dualism and monism dualistically, because if we limit ourselves to only one way of thinking we lose our understanding of the other which may be a better alternative within a given situation. An example of this would be if we ourselves monastically within the world as being no better nor any less than nature we can observe what processes are occurring by including ourselves in the process of environmental maintenance. Once we have a full understand of the an ecological process we can find a way to incorporate ourselves within its prosperity, but this can only happen if we understand that our actions upon that given ecosystem can have a negative side effect in which we did not anticipate. On the other hand we could see that the given action is beneficial to the environment, and what we need to understand is that our actions, natural or not, have an influence on what is around us. The spectrum of our existence is a matter of where we are at within the plane of when we should be