Tanner uses information and guidance from the famous Carl Von Clausewitz, to support his claim the south did not have a unifying reason for going to war. Clausewitz states “war is a continuation of politics by other means” and a nation should know what the people fight for, and if they do not, support or assistance from the common people will dwindle (pg. 78). The lack of political knowledge southerners obtained hindered the amount of support they gave, which would devastate the confederate armies if they did execute the Fabian warfare. Tanner also brings up the fact the confederate terrain remained very large and spacious, which benefitted and crippled the confederate …show more content…
Based off of his sources, using more primary documents from confederate soldiers and civilians would have shown how unsure the population stood and how exhauster the troops felt. It seemed he used sources from generals and high ranking citizens, which took away the aspect of war and applied it to the society. Using diary’s or letters from ordinary southerners would make the book more interesting, more personable, and would have incorporated the mentality which overwhelmed the southern