The Pros And Cons Of Citizens United

Improved Essays
Citizens United is a political organization that aims in maintaining and restoring the ideals of the Founding Fathers. That is, they believe in containing a limited government, in which federal, state, and local governments do not rule their territories in an authoritarian way. The goal is to have a democracy in the United States that would continue to value and protect the views, beliefs, and voice of most American citizens. They represent many Americans by representing their voices. In the case of Citizens United, the Supreme Court had established that individual people and groups such as special interest groups, for example, could form committees in which they could gain an unlimited amount of money in order for them to run against a particular candidate, or political party. This is …show more content…
People who favor Citizen United believe that unlimited spending and gaining of money is what Democracy is all about. The freedom to attain such finances in order to establish a strong foundation for their political group running for president. Thus, we see many corporations and politicians uniting in order to promote interests that suits them better as a whole. These influences may have positive results on the American people, but they can also have negative consequences as well. On the other hand the members of society that disagree with the ruling of Citizens United claim that it is the exact opposite of Democracy. This, in their opinion, is corruption within American politics, and they want to remove the ruling from current establishment. In conclusion, Citizens United case is a very important issue that would be hotly debated by politicians in the future. We will see if there is any change on it, or if it remains as is. All we know is that both sides of the issue believe that what they are doing, they are doing so in the name of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which occurred in 2010, is a standout amongst the most misconstrued U.S. Preeminent Court choices of cutting edge times. A standard, sensible decision, Citizens United by one means or another turned into a lightning bar for revolutionaries, would-be blue pencils and fanatic hacks over the political range. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a point of interest 5-to-4 choices by the United States Supreme Court that corporate financing of independent political programs in hopeful races can't be restricted, on the grounds that doing as such would be in resistance with the First Amendment. The choice came about because of the non-benefit company Citizens United's case under the watchful…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part One In 1776, Americans were primarily focused on creating an independent nation with a government that differed greatly from the King of Britain's. The Declaration of Independence placed a large focus on what the king did wrong, and the founding fathers’ desire to be separated from Britain. As stated in the Declaration, Americans possessed a strong desire to be “absolved from all allegiance to the British crown, and [to have] all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain… totally dissolved.” Moreover, there were several things that the founders disliked about the king, which they included in the Declaration.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The result of this is a lack of separation between the two, while in reality, the interests that a corporation has are far different than those of the individual. It is assumed that small donations from a person to a campaign will overall not affect the races as a…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    • Madison was speaking of bodies of countrymen who make an effort to promote their plans or economic ideals at the price of other citizens or in ways that conflict with the public good. They are also known as special-interest groups. In many governments they have come to control all of the central power, which would be a bad thing as all power would be ruled by one faction that would control the country and not improbably become oppressive. The biggest challenge for the Framers was to organize a government where monopolization would not be conceivable. To produce a political system that would be powerful enough to sustain regulation but would not jeopardize freedom.…

    • 1807 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years, there have been many debates regarding the constitution. One common debate being whether or not the constitution is flexible enough to live through the generations. Jefferson, a founding father, has stated, “The Constitution belongs to the living and not the dead.” This statement does allude to the longevity of the Constitution, as can be demonstrated through the amendment process, the elastic clause, and judicial review. The amendment process has allowed the United States government to amend the Constitution.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1787, the Constitution of the United States was signed by thirty-nine delegates. This new constitution was designed essentially to answer two questions. The first was the question of sovereignty and where the powers flowed from. The second was the question of limiting power. The people did not want one person to be too powerful.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States constitution was signed and approved by the constitutional convention delegates in 1787, and it needed ratification from nine states as it is required in article VII of the constitution before it could be enforced. States that decided not to ratify the constitution will be considered a different country, and not part of the union. With this knowledge, the urge of the ratification led to a conflict among the delegates that resulted in numerous documents, essays, pamphlets, and articles. The conflict; perhaps debate consists of two opposing sides; the Federalists who wanted the ratification of the constitution, and the Anti-Federalists objected to the ratification. The Federalists led by Alexander Hamilton were in favor of…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    In order to resolve the differences, delegates from the majority of the states met at the Annapolis Convention in 1786. But they were not able to reach any agreeable conclusion. That led them to decide to meet again later in Philadelphia. In second convention, delegates observed that there is urgent need to frame an entirely new constitution. A key issue of conflict was the structure of the new legislative branch.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists in the usa initially were supporting of wrecking your articles of confederation in addition to utilizing the composition. After this ended up being done, they put stock in the free elucidation than it and the Versatile Condition. Fundamentally, the Federalists advised little respect to mention rights and believed the central government needs been being capable which has a specific end goal to properly manage the nation. The Federalist Get together kicked the bucket when of the Hartford Tradition, yet later returned since the Whig Party. The Federalist Gathering could be connected with your advanced Just Gathering because they both have faith in utilizing Government and also a free translation of the Constitution (essentially certainly not tailing it) to further improve the country.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I feel that the United States as a whole has grown too apathetic towards its own success to really have most people hold any applicable interest in the near-future of the country, and to relate to the models of democracy Hudson discusses in an earlier chapter, the protective democracy where individuals protect their own economic self-interest only seems to work when the country happens to have a strong economy to do so. I felt that protective democracy is the weakest model presented in that reading, along with pluralist democracy, which runs on a dichotomy of relying on interest and lobbying groups to get anything done while still extoling the virtues of ‘rugged’ individualism. This seemed to me to be one of the biggest challenges to the separation of powers, and democracy itself, so far, as interest groups have clearly grown out of control in the United States to the point that we still have groups like Monsanto around despite decades of bad ideas such as DDT, Agent Orange, and the addition of chemicals into everyday food. Interest and lobbying groups are something that I do not believe James Madison could have anticipated in The Federalist Papers, and they have grown large and insidious enough to become a danger towards a just representative government. This is where I believe a combination of the participatory and developmental democracy models would work the best, as there can still be a ‘power elite,’ but the common people create unions and boards to better control and manage non-government institutions that matter to them.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The primary argument and deciding factor in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2008) was that Citizens United’s First Amendment rights were violated. The Supreme Court is held accountable towards upholding the constitution and upon scrutiny of all relevant rulings, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Citizens United (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 2008). The procedure of the Supreme Court’s ruling was a series of addressing previous held court precedents, including the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, and McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 2008). Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Citizens United in…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States Constitution is one of the shortest, longest standing, and most ambiguous constitutions in the world. This document establishes a democratic republic of many states under one federal government. In outlining the responsibilities and powers of each branch of the government and how they relate to state governments, many questions are left unanswered. Though this constitution outlines legislation’s role fairly clearly, it is far too vague concerning executive and judicial roles and the relationship between state and federal government.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the argument about the ratification of the United States Constitution, both the supporters and the opponents had substantial reasoning for their viewpoints. However, these groups differentiated greatly on what problems were most significant to their arguments. Each group came up with smaller “subgroups” of issues they had with the Constitution or Articles of Confederation. The supporting group of the Constitution was the Federalists, who believed in a strong central government that would better protect and support the new upcoming nation.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Democracy is about citizens having an equal say in the governing process, but many interest groups have an unfair influence over what the government can do.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays