Choices In The Dark Wood

Superior Essays
Life is analogous to a game of chess: life is constructed on the foundation of an innumerable amount of choices, which impact us, and the surrounding people; hence the analogy to chess becomes an integral factor. Chess is a strategy game between two people, where one player has to make correct and pivotal decisions to outmaneuver the other, and claim victory. Consequently, wrong choices in the game lead to dire consequences such as loss, and a long match. Awful choices in life tend to take similar forms in their effects, such as that they frequently pave the way to regret and grief. "The Dark Wood" is the vivid representation of a cloudy, misty mind, as well as being lost. It is simple to ponder aimlessly in thought when making crucial decisions, due to the numerous variables which are used to justify a particular action. Our five senses receive information on these multifarious variables that play significant roles in our lives; thus, leading to a …show more content…
Whether attaining our most primary, or the most complex needs somewhere along the way we will eventually drift away from our individual set paths. As Virgil was with Dante, being his guide, is how we should be with society. Either a guide out of the darkness and into the light or a guide out of the “Dark Wood”. People who wander in a “Dark Wood” may drift; namely, because social support in their lives is vacant. Meanwhile, we are also helping ourselves self-actualize by portraying our humanity. The benevolence that people have to others is a moral choice, moreover of being an erratic decision every day. Morality is not an iota when it comes to decisions; nonetheless, so is self-actualizing. Self-actualizing is the primary impetus, whether people believe or not helping others fulfills our esteem needs. Swathing ourselves around loving and caring people helps eliminate the vacant social

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This demonstrates not only the happiness generated by being kind, but also how when individuals are kind,…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyday, people carry on with their lives knowing that there is both good and evil in the world. Some might distinguish the evil outweighing the good, while others spot the good outweighing the evil. Whichever side one might choose from this debate, it is natural that for humans to stop and wonder about humanity. A recurring controversy that crosses over a person's mind is whether humans are naturally and inherently good or, worse, they’re naturally and inherently evil. Society tends to lean on the idea that humans are selfish, in fact, 78% of the population believes others to be more selfish than they really are.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Conversely, the act of selfless giving for the right reasons – to help others – is more likely to create long-term positive change. Due to the fact that she acts selflessly, even most times to her own disadvantage,…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I will defend psychological egoism as the most probable explanation for moral choice and motivation. I hold psychological egoism to be “the view that all men are selfish in everything that they do, that is, that the only motive from which anyone ever acts is self-interest” (Rachels 233). Since every action is moved by a desire to be satisfied, even in supposedly altruistic acts, one acts on a desire to satisfy one’s desire, so that supposedly altruistic acts are not actually altruistic. James Rachels, to whom my defining of psychological egoism is attributed, counters psychological egoism as incorrect moral skepticism. In the form of a Platonic dialogue, I will present, if successful, the impossibility for any ‘moral’ conduct beyond psychological egoism, counteracting Rachels own refutation in his essay, “Egoism and Moral Scepticism.”…

    • 2217 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Landing Page –Guide to Catholic Social Thought in society Catholic Social Thought refers to the body combining social issues within the economic, political, personal and spiritual atmosphere. This is continuously being developed in order to guide each individual, communities and societies in responding to social problems for a greater change in society. “Whenever our interior life becomes caught up its own interests and concerns, there is no longer room for others, no place for the poor. God’s voice is no longer heard, the quiet joy of his love is no longer felt, and the desire to do good fades”. –Pope Francis, Evangelli Gaudium Part A: 9 Principles of Catholic Social Thought (CST): Dignity of the Human Person:…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Spanning continents, centuries, and cultures, generosity, as defined by the Oxford Online English Dictionary, is “the quality of being kind, understanding, and not selfish; a willingness to ive money and other valuable things to others.” (Oxford Online Dictionary). Just as value may vary depending on context, generosity may be perceived in many different forms; it can be as simple as sharing a piece of food with a friend to donation large sums of monetary resources to the public. “The Ninety-Five Theses,” written by Doctor Martin Luther, illustrates the friar’s blatant protest against the Catholic Church, and its corrupted practices, through contrasting instructions that Luther deemed aligned with the Bible.…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Intro) Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” and Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat ethics” are contradictory philosophical works that examine whether scarce resources should be shared with the poor. Singer’s argument is that “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad" (Singer, 1972); therefore all people become morally obligated to help the poor. While Hardin argues that ethics of a Lifeboat should be followed because there is a finite amount of resources available at our disposal (Hardin, 1974, pp.566). Both authors take extreme positions by providing opposing arguments on whether we should be involved in helping the famine or not. This essay will analyze the rational of both authors’ while trying…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Socrates

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates fulfills the will of god by inquiring into the wisdom of people: “God orders me to fulfil the philosopher's mission of searching into myself and other men.” (Plato, 30). Socrates’ accusers hate him because he “[...]went and tried to explain to [them] that [they] thought [themselves] wise, but [were] not really wise” (Plato, 23). Socrates’ three main accusers are Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moral Theory By Rachels

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In our textbook, Rachels argues that people require humility and the understanding of where they stand in the universe. He believes that we should treat people the way they deserve to be treated and that we should hope these actions are reciprocated onto us. He believes that there are multiple strategies in finding where we are in life, such as comparing one’s life to that of other’s. We must know that we are not alone in this world and that we have an obligation in taking care of others. Rachels believes that we are rewarded for our work and self-improvement, but not our luck.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” was written in a crucial time during the Civil Rights Movement. During this time period, the nation had just ended the war and added the 13th amendment to the constitution, which made slavery illegal. Consequently, following the civil war the south went under “reconstruction”, a period in time where the federal government aided in rebuilding the southern states. Once President Hayes was elected federal troops were pulled out of the south, nevertheless supremacists began to enforce segregation and limited African Americans from voting. Dr. King had been a leader in the Civil Rights Movement in advocating desegregation across the country for nearly ten years, then marked a turning point, the Birmingham campaign of 1963.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his classic work “Mere Christianity,” C. S. Lewis describes a basic Christian worldview. A significant theme Lewis discusses is the issue of morality and its meaning in relation to God and to one another. Where does morality come from and how does one become moral? Lewis contends that all ethics originate with God and that human beings cannot be truly moral apart from the transforming work of Jesus Christ.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Each one lives, waving selfishness; indeed, it is human nature; whereas, one's motives show its frame of mind and character, not nature. Each one lives, waving selfishness; indeed, it is human nature; whereas, one's motives show its frame of mind and character, not nature. Each one lives, waving selfishness; indeed, it is human nature; whereas, one's motives show its frame of mind and character, not nature.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the dawn of America, the question of why society did virtuous deeds remained a notorious fact. Either a colonist followed a Puritan belief, that God expected him or her to live a holy life full of virtuous works and kindness, or he or she followed a humanist life geared toward man’s potential and present earthly life. Today’s America, though, has become a divergent place. Numerous proletariats argue that the general public of the 21st century remains driven to treat others empathetically, simply by the feeling of aiding their fellow man, and while these ideas may be true in numerous cases, logical intellectuals would agree that in actuality, the fear of failure and the need for obligatory reward, motivates society to augment humanity.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers such as Aristotle, The Buddha, and the more modern-day Nel Noddings have all begged the question, “What does it mean to live a good life?” Aristotle’s main view aims at happiness, and focus on the self. The Buddha and Nel Noddings both believe that one should not fully focus on the self, but more on the selfless acts for others. Each of these philosophers has determined their own proper way to lead a good life and I will examine each philosophy through comparison to the eldest, Aristotle. I believe Aristotle’s philosophy to be agreeable, but I feel he is missing certain key components which I will discuss by the end of the essay.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will argue that pleasure and pain are imperative in the moral life. My main reason is that in order to live a moral life you must be morally virtuous, which involves pleasure and pain which are always paired with actions and feelings. The crucial importance of pleasure and pain and its role in the moral life are statements that are more likely to be true then false. Research Aristotle was a very influential philosopher who focused on the happiness principle and all that happiness entailed: “The Nicomachean Ethics”.…

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays