Nina Shapiro states in her article, “With fewer vaccinations, is your child’s school safe?”, “Across the country, preschools and elementary schools are declaring themselves nut free or peanut free, asking families not to pack lunch foods that could pose life-threatening dangers to highly allergic children-But the great bulk of children face a far greater risk of harm from disease. If the goal is really to protect children, I’d like to see all schools declared ‘unvaccinated-free zones’” (Paragraphs 1 and 3). According to this evidence, schools are focusing on other things that do not have the same importance as a disease that can affect a child’s development. This is not fully creating a safe environment in schools. Allergies can be harmful, but diseases are by far more harmful. For this reason, vaccinating children is a very effective way of creating a safer environment in schools. In her article, “With fewer vaccinations, is your child’s school safe?”, Nina Shapiro also “In order for a school to be considered truly immunized, from a public health standpoint, its immunization rate needs to be 90% or higher” (Paragraph 7). This quote shows that there are schools that have very low vaccination rates. This makes a school extremely unsafe because there could be viruses, bacteria, infections and many more spreading among the students. Every school should be required to have an immunization rate of 90% or above. Nina Shapiro also asserts in her article, “With fewer vaccinations, is your child’s school safe?”, “The law in California mandates that students in public and private schools be immunized, but it also allows easy to get exemptions for personal beliefs” (Paragraph 4). This suggests that laws like the ones in California that are meant to provide a safe environment in schools for children should be enforced on everyone. Personal beliefs
Nina Shapiro states in her article, “With fewer vaccinations, is your child’s school safe?”, “Across the country, preschools and elementary schools are declaring themselves nut free or peanut free, asking families not to pack lunch foods that could pose life-threatening dangers to highly allergic children-But the great bulk of children face a far greater risk of harm from disease. If the goal is really to protect children, I’d like to see all schools declared ‘unvaccinated-free zones’” (Paragraphs 1 and 3). According to this evidence, schools are focusing on other things that do not have the same importance as a disease that can affect a child’s development. This is not fully creating a safe environment in schools. Allergies can be harmful, but diseases are by far more harmful. For this reason, vaccinating children is a very effective way of creating a safer environment in schools. In her article, “With fewer vaccinations, is your child’s school safe?”, Nina Shapiro also “In order for a school to be considered truly immunized, from a public health standpoint, its immunization rate needs to be 90% or higher” (Paragraph 7). This quote shows that there are schools that have very low vaccination rates. This makes a school extremely unsafe because there could be viruses, bacteria, infections and many more spreading among the students. Every school should be required to have an immunization rate of 90% or above. Nina Shapiro also asserts in her article, “With fewer vaccinations, is your child’s school safe?”, “The law in California mandates that students in public and private schools be immunized, but it also allows easy to get exemptions for personal beliefs” (Paragraph 4). This suggests that laws like the ones in California that are meant to provide a safe environment in schools for children should be enforced on everyone. Personal beliefs