Cherokee Removal Research Paper

Improved Essays
Cherokee people lived all over the land before the United States even existed. “The Cherokees lived on land extending from North Carolina to South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, and Alabama for hundreds of years” (Green & Perdue, 1). They were constantly moving around involuntarily. The Cherokee tribes were often forced to leave their land when Americans found use of the land that the Cherokees were living on. White Americans were wanting their land because they found gold, wanted their livestock and they were able to evict the Cherokees out of their homes” (Green & Perdue, 92) The process of removal of the Cherokees was not a fair removal, because the Americans were taking away their control of the land which left the Cherokees to stand up …show more content…
The Cherokees were in control of their ideas, housing, and government. “Henry Knox understood the Cherokee people because he had several years of experience in Indian matters. Knox also believed that the tribes were independent and had the right to self-govern themselves in their borders” (Green & Perdue, 10). Knox tried to be on the Indians side for the most part, but sometimes he had to make some sacrifices to please other people. “Henry Knox decided that any land that would be purchased from the Indians had to be done through a treaty and he would take steps to “civilizing”the Indians” (Green & Perdue, 10-11). The Cherokees had a lot of pressure upon them about leaving the land. “The idea of Cherokees being civilized was not going to happen fully because of the new pattern of racist thought” (Green & Perdue, 15). The Cherokees were the most civilized Indian tribe, so they did not understand why they were being justified for removal for the American citizens. Andrew Jackson said “making treaties with the Indians was absurd, so the best way to get the land from the Cherokees was to just take the land” (Green & Perdue, …show more content…
“The Old Settlers wanted the newcomers to live under their new government” (Green & Perdue, 168). The Newcomers did not like this idea because they should all consider themselves equal and live together, not under each other. The newcomers ended up killing the three leaders.
The Cherokees believed they deserved the land they owned and bettered the land. Although Cherokee removal is not fair for the Cherokees all of the time, they have to make sacrifices and try to make treaties with people that will work in their favor. “Cherokee removal remains a central event in the historical consciousness of modern Cherokees. People nowadays tell stories about Cherokee removal, and feel for the Cherokees loss of their ancestral land. Cherokees proved their rights through treaties and documents, but after standing their ground for long and being miserable they ended up moving to new

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Choctaw Indians Case Study

    • 1771 Words
    • 7 Pages

    But the Sioux did not resist their original removal like the other tribes. It was the taking of land that they were already moved to that angered them. Therefore,…

    • 1771 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    How did the American government shift from an “expansion with honor” policy to a policy of the expulsion of the Cherokee people? The Cherokee people were once a great nation whose population spanned all across the South Eastern corners of the North American continent. The Cherokee people once called states such as North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, Kentucky, and Virginia home. The Cherokee people once governed their own nation, a nation where men hunted and women farmed. A nation where both men and women worked together in harmony as a balance for each other, an equilibrium.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Cherokee Removal

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Monetary awards were given to guides and supporters of the removal plan. Indians who resisted migration west were put into stockades for long periods of time, until the arrangement for removal began. “They are prisoners, without a crime to justify the fact”.5 Voices of Andrew Jackson, John Ridge, Lewis Cass, the Cherokee women, Evan Jones, Elias Boudinot and many more could not change the course of events happening to the Cherokee nation. The complexity of this time in history raises many concerns for the survival of the Native Americans. The authors posed many questions as to the actions and decisions of the Cherokees.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The white settlers had wanted the Native Americans land for farming. Jackson had decided to remove all Native Americans from their land. In 1830 Congress passed the Indian Removal Act, ordering all Native Americans to move west of the Mississippi River. The Five Civilized Tribes consists of The Cherokee, Choctaw, Seminole, Creek, and Chickasaw.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cherokee Indian Dbq Essay

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Besides that, in the excerpt from “Cherokee General …. American People”(1830) explains how treaties never benefited Cherokee it only benefited whites. There are now hundreds of thousands of citizens living the land own by Cherokee. We trust United States Gov., but now where do we go for our protection. (Doc.4) Beyond that, political actions coincided with increasing economic pressures to give these land to white settlement for development of the area.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cherokees goal was to keep their lands because they were one of the major tribes being affected by his policies. Basically, the case was to prohibit white-Americans from First Nation lands unless they had a license. Unfortunately, Jackson’s inaction when it came to enforcing these rulings resulted in consequences for the First Nations. Overall, the Indian Removal Act passed by Andrew Jackson violated the treaties set by the First Nation made to keep their ancestral…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cherokee lived on land that was suitable for growing cotton. His Indian policy was to simply move the Indians out of the way so whites could take control of the land. He saw Indians as savages because they lived in the wild. (Book page 255) This was a cruel and inconsiderate policy that cost the Cherokee Indian tribe greatly.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essentially, Jackson did not value the Indian ethnic groups as individuals of the country, forcing them to leave. He did not regard tribes as independent sovereign entities but rather as tenants of the government. Jackson believed that if the Indians wished to maintain their tribal government, they would have to expand into Western territory. The Cherokees rejected the treaty and were transported by military force to distant lands in what is known as the Trail of Tears. Jackson exclaims to Congress that the Indian Removal Act, “will relieve…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1830, Jackson put forth The Indian Removal Act, which proposed that all of the Native Americans living east of the Mississippi River would be moved west, into Indian Territory. Through this, Jackson believed that he was helping the Indians because in his opinion, having settlers and Indians living in close proximity was not beneficial to either group (“Indian Removal Act” 1). This Act was controversial because many Native American tribes were already promised land, which they were now being forced to leave (“Indian Removal Act” 2). The Cherokee Indian tribes living in Georgia were strongly against the Indian Removal Act due to a treaty with the state claiming that they could keep their land as long as they wanted if they assimilated into American culture (O’Brien 3). The Cherokee tribes had kept their end of the treaty by speaking English and sending their children to schools, but the state of Georgia wanted the land because they had found gold there and the land was fertile for growing cotton.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Enduring a cultural, spiritual, and physical bludgeoning since its first contact with European society, the Cherokee Nation succumbed to the foreign power in the first half of the nineteenth century. However, as tensions rose between the two entities, nationalist attitudes emerged to justify the arguments on both sides of the struggle. The United States’ perpetual infringement of Indian sovereignty inspired both sentiments of opposition and reluctant submission within the indigenous nation. Stemming from religious and governmental assimilation policies, the law’s bias against the Cherokees in their efforts to keep their borders and culture intact, and political infighting over land secession, Cherokee nationalism encompassed the spirit of resistance to Western encroachment. Lacking the Christian religion, the Cherokee Nation became a hotspot for evangelical missionaries to spread the Gospel, establish Western values through schools, and breed contempt among their subjects.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The indian removal act of 1830 was justified and the cherokees should've moved because they had done horrible things to people, better land, and freedom. The first reason, the cherokees should’ve moved is because they have done horrible…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was said that President Andrew Jackson was looking in the best interest of U.S. citizens and moved the indians to help keep from conflicts that could possibly lead to war from arising yet again between the United States and the Native Americans or that some Native tribes were just too violent and were seen as a threat by U.S. citizens. It seemed like Americans and Native Americans could not blend and live together peacefully and that is also a said reason why the Trail of Tears…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Things that lead up to the Indian removal act being passed was the greed of white settlers who kept moving onto Indian lands. They believed the Indians were in their way and pressured the federal government for Indian land. All five tribes showed resistance, but the Cherokee tried doing it the peaceful way. Their leader John Ross took their case to the Supreme Court. Chief John Marshall appealed to the Cherokee in March of 1832 and said “The law of the Georgians can have no force”.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On May 28, 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The law authorized Andrew Jackson to negotiate with Indians for their removal to federal land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their homelands. Andrew Jackson was able to convince the American people that Indians could not coexist peacefully with them. He argued that the Indians were uncivilized and needed to be guarded from their own savage ways. As a result of his actions, thousands of Indians were forcibly ripped from their homes and onto a journey to a unknown territory, that was not as fertile as their home grounds.…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays