Choctaw Indians Case Study

Improved Essays
Indian (d)
a) Although many Choctaw Indians did resist the removal, it was a quieter one than the others.
b) After the Treaty of Fort Laramie (also called the Sioux Treaty of 1868,) the Sioux were granted the ownership of the Black Hills and hunting rights to various parts of South Dakota, Montana, and Wyoming. However, when gold was discovered in the Black Hills, gold prospectors began to violate the treaty, leading to the Black Hills War. When the U.S. government seized the Black Hills and offered the Sioux money for the land, they refused the money and demanded the land back. But the Sioux did not resist their original removal like the other tribes. It was the taking of land that they were already moved to that angered them. Therefore,
…show more content…
The country was then divided into North and South. The publicity sky-rocketed, state elections were being tampered with on account of the slavery issue, and riots were started. This was the big step into the Civil War.

Justification for secession for the south (b)
a) The South did seem a bit afraid of the overpowering Northern economy. However, this was not the main justification.
b) Southern states were more afraid of losing their authority over the citizens. If the Federal Government begins taking jurisdiction over the matters of the states, what decisions could the states make? What good would their authority be if the Federal Government ruled over them? The loss of authority made the Southern states frightened for their beliefs.
c) The protection of the “peculiar institution” was important to Southerners, but not as much of a priority as states’ rights.
d) If Yankee senior citizens were flocking to Florida, many families would be sad to say goodbye. However, I do not believe anyone would find this a justification for secession.

Why the Civil War was fought
…show more content…
The answer depends on which fighters we are discussing. For the slaves, the Civil War was fought to destroy slavery. This also seems to be what most people discuss today when conversing on the Civil War.
b) If we are discussing the goals of state officials, it was the fight to secure states’ rights. This is not what most Americans today remember being the main purpose of the war.
c) To many, the Civil War was fought for the preservation of the Union. President Lincoln’s purpose in fighting the war was to reunite the shattered halves of the Union. I believe President Lincoln freed slaves for the good of the Union, not necessarily for the slaves. In fact, he even said that if there was a way to save the Union without freeing slaves, he would do it. By granting slaves freedom, he weakened the Southern resistance. This strengthened the Federal government and helped encourage the free blacks to join the Union Army.
d) There did not seem to be many who simply wanted to punish the South.
Like I said, it is difficult to answer this question with so many different motives. It depends on what a person would gain by it. The blacks were fighting for freedom, the states wanted to keep their authority, and President Lincoln needed the country be stitched back together. However, what the war is remembered for today is its fight for the freedom and equal rights of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln sought to unite the nation once more, upholding the nation and reestablishing the power over the South. Even in the slave letter did he point out that neither side really pursued to free them. The South wanted to keep them as slaves and the North wanted the slaves only for their army. Neither side sought for their independence from enslavement, only the slaves themselves fought for their own liberty and freedom. Even at the end of the war the South did not see the slaves as a free group of people, they resented the Union, the damage they inflicted on their homes and land and they abhorred the new working structure the government created.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Republican Party Formation

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lincoln said that “the result would be slavery or no slavery” (Lincoln, “House Divided”). This was a wakeup call for both the South and North for the next president could be the determination of the progression of slavery. The realization that the answer had to be one or the other made each side more violent to get the outcome that they wanted. Douglas’ continuous use of ad hominem was affective when he stated that “Lincoln was pro-slave equality” (The Rise of the Republican Party). This made the South ever so anger for they did not already agree on the idea of ending slavery so let alone the citizenship of African Americans.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These kinds of plans to free the slaves created conflicts between states which led to the beginning of civil war. The election of a president who supported the freedom of slaves was an enemy of the people, which again resulted in separation of the nation. People in the southern states felt that the leadership did not have their interests at heart by advocating for the slave 's liberty. Slavery should not have become centralized as the reason why states seceded considering that other issues of importance could have caused that eventuality. Issues of taxation of states by the population and inclusion of slaves in the process could have been a better reason for the states to secede and begin the war.…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In effect, there were small-scale wars through these territories between pro-slave and abolitionist factions, which incited an increasingly militaristic view of a coming war. Southerners were concerned that abolitionists would sabotage new slave settlements in the west, which increased hostilities between the north and the South. In this manner, the rationale for a southern Confederacy became a more realistic goal, since the federal government was essentially making it a “first-come/first-serve” style of territorial expansion. This only encouraged a feeling of distrust of southerners for abolitionists, which galvanized a more aggressive militaristic position, especially in the context of secessionist ideology. Therefore, abolitionist sabotage and militarism was a primary catalyst for the southern secessionist movement, since it appeared that the northern federalist government was not willing to provide a means of balancing the issue of slave and free state sovereignty.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, whatever the circumstances may have been for the start of the civil war, many lives were lost. Was the civil war really a solution to abolish slavery? From the southerners view point the war was perceived as a rebellion and a form of independence likewise, northern may have seen it as a revolution. In essence I don’t think the Civil war could have been avoided based on all the factors that was surrounding it. In my opinion it would be difficult to please the north and not upset the south and vice…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gary W. Gallagher didn’t believe that the war was over slavery but, that the war was over the Union. He provided solid evidence on why he believed that the Civil War was not over slavery but over the Union. I provided evidence also that joined Gary W. Gallagher that the war’s primary focus was the Union. The war was fought for the Union but, the Union attacked slavery because they knew that slavery was a dominant tool that the Confederates used. Moreover, if the war was fought over slavery then slavery would’ve ended when the war did not months after.…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His ideas and way of thinking was different than the original democratic, pro-slavery holding people thought. Lincoln made the right decision fighting for the civil war. I do not think there was another alternative. If he would have allowed the south to get away with seceding it would have given every state more power and believe that they had more control over the president. I think if they would have tried to reason with the south they would have pushed back harder and caught the northerners at a disadvantage because they would not have been prepared for any battles.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the beginning of the war, the goal was to preserve the Union. Slavery was not initially considered to be an important factor in this goal. But as the war progressed, the topic of slavery became more and more pronounced in relation to preserving the Union. Although Lincoln had no initial plan to free the slaves, he still considered this as an option if it would mean that the Union would be preserved. The Confederate States of America’s economy was highly dependent on slave labor so this would hinder the Confederate economy a great deal.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Social Changes

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While the nation was undergoing an industrial change, “the debate over slavery was tearing the nation apart” (xxiii). The debate about slavery turned into arguments and eventually turned it to something bigger, which was questioning the constitutional system. The argument over slavery became an important factor in society, as it tore the nation into two. The South was very dependent on slavery, and they were not ready to change anytime soon. The North, however, opposed to the concept of slavery.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The American Civil War brings a lot of attention to people. It really affected the Southern states where slavery was heavily enforced. Slavery is known to be the leading cause of the American Civil War; The Union wanted slavery to be demolished, while the Confederate did not want slavery to be spread into the northern states. This detail is important because the Confederate was not against the idea. It was slavery as a whole, they just did not agree that slavery deserved a part in the United States as a whole.This war was a significant part of America and it took place between 1860-1865 when the Southern states began to drift away from the Union.…

    • 2436 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays