Compare And Contrast Machiavelli And Castiglione

Superior Essays
Throughout history, great leaders and figures influenced their respective lands greatly, fitting them into their own mold. These people had a set vision on what they wanted their land to be like, and some of these people, even wrote their ideas down. Three of these individuals are Baldassare Castiglione, an Italian diplomat, Niccolò Machiavelli also an Italian diplomat, and George Washington, the first president of the United States. They wrote The Courtier, The Prince, and Rules of Civility & Decent Behaviour in Company and Conversation, respectively. Castiglione’s book, published in 1528, was on the proper behavior of a courtier, or a noble who was an attendant to a royal person. Machiavelli's treatise, written in 1517, was on the proper style of leadership by individuals, and was dedicated to Lorenzo de Medici, whom Machiavelli held in contempt after being kicked out of his position as military advisor in Florence. Washington’s set of rules was written when he was only sixteen, …show more content…
Machiavelli and Castiglione had their own form of intelligence that they would have in their ideal person. For Castiglione, this form of intelligence refers to being immersed in literature. He stated that, “I would have the courtier know literature, in particular those known as the humanities. … Let him be proficient in writing in verse and prose, particularly in our own, vulgar language.”(Castiglione, 7) Castiglione believes that literature is important, especially in the vernacular. He states that the courtier should have a good grasp on literature and writing, or just standard intelligence. His idea that studying Renaissance ideas is important, whereas Machiavelli, believes that instead of knowing classical stuff, you should know about history. In his writing, he

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli’s reputation rests primarily on his works, The Prince, this brought him a reputation as an atheist and an immoral cynic. The Prince is an extended analysis of how to obtain and preserve…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Italian cities, there was much conflict and arguments amongst the Borgia family who were focused on trying to seize and maintain power. Machiavelli in response, devised a text, The Prince, which illustrates how to run an effectual government. In The Prince, he also describes how the good and effective rulers have to learn “not to be good,” and that they have to be prepared and willing to put aside ethical concerns of justice and kindness, in order to preserve the balance of the state. This logic was atrocious to peers around him, for they were used to the old medieval ideas of ruling where the king was chosen by God to serve as someone on earth, who manages the law. They also saw that the ruler/king was an all-powerful human being with…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contrarily Machiavelli is targeting the audience of a ruler, not of one being…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is the ideal person? Depending the people asked, the majority of people’s opinions will differ. During the time of the enlightenment and colonial periods, there were three men who wrote popular books that defined what an ideal person was, Niccolò Machiavelli, Baldassare Castiglione and George Washington. Machiavelli was a military advisor when Lorenzo de Medici was temporarily excommunicated from Florence. Machiavelli grew up under the Medici rule, but he saw the instability in government when others didn’t.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli is the “heir… to civic humanism” because he is keenly aware that any advice towards the ruling elite may be seen as a threat, and so he must validate his opinions through the use of examples from romanticized ancient Rome and Greece to show that his opinions were not an issue, but the truth behind them which would remain true even at his death or expulsion threatened the stability of any government. As is the case with Renaissance humanism, Machiavelli drew comparisons from knowledge of the ancient world to the world in which he lived, evaluating each based on each other. He took particular interest in the actions of the leaders, specifically the key points in history which led to their rise to and fall from power. He attempts to create rules or guidelines for future leaders to follow based on any consistencies he saw, giving him the title of “heir…to civic humanism.” Without further inquiry here it is impossible to say to what extent Machiavelli romanticized the ancient times, as he may have been picking and choosing stories which best aligned with his views, omitting contrary evidence, or he may have been using all the works available to him at the time.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He is writing this text in order to counsel and influence the minds of rulers or as he calls them, “Princes”. Machiavelli calls for the separation of politics and ethics. Machiavelli does not like Christianity and despises the Holy Roman Empire, as he does not believe Princes should submit to a set of grandiose ideals. Rather a prince should take whatever action is necessary to prolong his rule and protect the state, regardless of religious or ethical considerations. Machiavelli provides a harsh, sometimes callous version of complete and outright…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As above-mentioned, we must clear that Machiavelli is not the person who advocated bad morality. On the contrary, he thought that the morality and religious would have a great influence of society. He also thought that a country would not have a good organization without good virtue. So we must combined with the specific time and background when we try to understand who was Niccolo Machiavelli and why he wrote the book. Otherwise, it will result in many misunderstanding of…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This project entails an argument that Machiavelli’s writings did not convey irony in his discussions concerning God. He might have hated the Church, but that should not detract from his Christian faith. Machiavelli’s combination of ancient religion and Christianity fit somewhat into what ancient theologians such as Justin Martyr, Origen and many others did. These men mostly focused on bringing Platonism into Christianity, but Machiavelli considered Aristotle more important. Black argued that Machiavelli was not the next Aristotle, however, this paper would not argue that either.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli, however, cares little to none on human nature other than how best to understand and therefore manipulate it. He is in stark contrast to More, operating on the darker facets of society. Manipulation, deception and trickery are his speciality. Machiavelli's Prince pushes that a ruler be feared rather than…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli’s Prince seeks to recruit and educate a ruler in the art of ruling. His ideal rulers are founders, men who created a fatherland and were not afraid to sacrifice lives and their self-interests for the common good. Machiavelli stresses that a ruler needs to appear virtuous while using vices when necessary to achieve positive results. Machiavelli teaches the ruler to divide his self. “It is essential, therefore, for a Prince […] to have learned how to be other than good, and to use or not use his goodness as necessity requires” (Machiavelli, 40).…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    During the Renaissance, there was a rebirth in human dignity. Pico Della Mirandola (1463-1494) wrote the “Oration on the Dignity of Man”. Pico explained that humans are a miracle. He says a “…man’s place in the universe is somewhere between the beasts and the angels, but, because of the divine image planted in him, there are no limits to what man can accomplish…” (Giovanni Pico Della Mirandola, Pico Della Mirandola on the Dignity of Man).…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli believes that the ruler must take things into his hands and not depend on God to help him rule. The ruler has to work and be worthy of the…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Machiavelli and Erasmus had great concepts and ideas. They were both born at similar times however; they were born in different areas. Machiavelli was born in Florence Italy in 1469. Erasmus was born in 1466 in Rotterdam, Netherlands. He was a great scholar in the northern renaissance and the first editor of the New Testament.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many political philosopher’s eyes, there is a special relationship between the ideas of moral goodness and legitimate authority. Some of these political philosophers believed that the use of political power was only morally correct if it was exercised under a ruler who had virtuous morals. These rulers who had virtuous morals were then told that in order to be successful, they needed to make decisions in accordance with the standards of ethical goodness. This moralistic view of authority is what Machiavelli criticizes in his work “The Prince.” In Machiavelli’s book, “The Prince,” the readers are introduced to political values that do not necessarily give full recognition to morality or religion.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead, it provides a kind of protection against the “wretched” men and world that he believes we live in; morality in an amoral world, however ideal or preferable, is far less effective than adapting and being amoral yourself. His claim that being amoral and ruthless are far more effective means of grasping and maintaining power, therefore ensuring stability and effective rule which benefits the people, is not unfounded. It is too idealistic to claim that Machiavelli’s amoralism makes his arguments defective; especially within the context of 16th century Florentine politics, his assertion that one must be ruthless and “play the game” of politics hold steady…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays