Compare And Contrast Machiavelli And Castiglione

Superior Essays
Throughout history, great leaders and figures influenced their respective lands greatly, fitting them into their own mold. These people had a set vision on what they wanted their land to be like, and some of these people, even wrote their ideas down. Three of these individuals are Baldassare Castiglione, an Italian diplomat, Niccolò Machiavelli also an Italian diplomat, and George Washington, the first president of the United States. They wrote The Courtier, The Prince, and Rules of Civility & Decent Behaviour in Company and Conversation, respectively. Castiglione’s book, published in 1528, was on the proper behavior of a courtier, or a noble who was an attendant to a royal person. Machiavelli's treatise, written in 1517, was on the proper style of leadership by individuals, and was dedicated to Lorenzo de Medici, whom Machiavelli held in contempt after being kicked out of his position as military advisor in Florence. Washington’s set of rules was written when he was only sixteen, …show more content…
Machiavelli and Castiglione had their own form of intelligence that they would have in their ideal person. For Castiglione, this form of intelligence refers to being immersed in literature. He stated that, “I would have the courtier know literature, in particular those known as the humanities. … Let him be proficient in writing in verse and prose, particularly in our own, vulgar language.”(Castiglione, 7) Castiglione believes that literature is important, especially in the vernacular. He states that the courtier should have a good grasp on literature and writing, or just standard intelligence. His idea that studying Renaissance ideas is important, whereas Machiavelli, believes that instead of knowing classical stuff, you should know about history. In his writing, he

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Political theorist Niccolo Machiavelli rejected the notion that a king should follow Christian teachings and the belief that Christian morality was in charge of politics. Instead he believed that political rulers should forgo notions of good or evil and focus on strengthening their kingdom. In his novel The Prince, Machiavelli studied politics by using reason. He states that a while it would be nice for a prince to have “all the name qualities that are reputed good, they cannot all be possessed or observed” and that instead “he should be prudent enough to avoid the scandal of those vices which would lose him the state”. He then goes on to debate whether it is better for a prince to “be loved more than feared, or feared more than loved” and examines other great rulers and leaders who accomplished many triumphs while feared by their people (Machiavelli p 310). While he does think it is “laudable for a prince to keep good faith and live with integrity” it does not necessarily mean that they will achieve great things and that “a prudent ruler ought to not keep faith when by so doing it would be against his interest” (Machiavelli p 311). This type of political thinking was completely different from the medieval era and very radical for its…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his book, Machiavelli believes that a ruler should educate himself by reading the history of the past rulers so that the ruler will have knowledge on how to go about wars. Glerberzon states, “ a prince should learn from records of practical or real experience”. Machiavelli’s theory is based on experience to gain knowledge, whereas Locke believes that society should look at reason and the rule of law rather than state of nature. Machiavelli believes that in order to be a good ruler, they have to be willing to be amoral. Glerberzon states, “a Prince must do whatever he has do [good or evil] to retain power, while always maintaining “the appearance of virtue” . Machiavelli theory argues that a ruler must do whatever it takes to gain and hold political power, but in the eyes of his subjects have the appearance of being morally…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lorenzo de Medici significantly influenced Machiavelli’s work, he even wrote about Medici in The Prince. Machiavelli wrote in his book that there was no way to judge something as moral or immoral when it comes to power. Machiavelli believed that power came from political activity and that legitimate use of power does not deteriorate one’s respect from those they have power over. He stated that power and authority are equal and whoever has power has the right to command. Machiavelli stated that generosity does not necessarily mean one has power. In his theory, having a strict set of morals can not ensure the gain or the containment of political power. The book's 26 chapters can be divided into four sections: Chapters 1-11 discuss the different types of principalities or states, Chapters 12-14 discuss the different types of armies and the proper conduct of a prince as military leader, Chapters 15-23 discuss the character and behavior of the prince, and Chapters 24-26 discuss Italy's desperate political situation. The Prince suggested several behavioral ideas that were considered immoral these include: It is better to be stingy than generous, It is better to be cruel than merciful, It is better to break promises if keeping them would be against one's interests, Princes must avoid making themselves hated and despised; the goodwill of the people is a better defense than any fortress, Princes…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first piece of evidence to suggest Machiavelli is the prince is seen in the Dedicatory Letter. Machiavelli states, “... no greater gift could be made by me than to give you the capacity to be able to understand...all that I have learned and understood in so many years...” (Prince, dedication). This statement suggests that Machiavelli is persuading Lorenzo de Medici that his involvement in politics and his knowledge of the ancients make him an invaluable adviser. Thus proving that intellect is a key component in being a ruler. Machiavelli hence suggests that it is in the ruler’s best interest to set aside previous beliefs about politics and look at the truth. Through the process of seeking truth, Machiavelli is extremely aware of mankind's shortcomings (Prince, ch.17). Being aware of these failures enables him to see that in order to live a safe life one must embrace these flaws. Thus if someone acts in a “rotten” manner he will likely be feared rather than loved (Prince, ch.17). While being feared might seem unnecessary to some, Machiavelli goes on to note that being loved is a much more dangerous way of life because, love, is held by men who are “wicked”. Without the instilment of fear, the loyalty that comes from love would be “broken at every opportunity” for mans own advantage (Prince, ch.17). Furthermore, because Machiavelli was banished, it is suggested that he was indeed feared and not only because of…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It later gained popularity with the public when he advanced as a general of the United States Army in 1775 (The George Washington Foundation). Castiglione, Machiavelli and Washington all had different ideas on what the ideal person was. For Castiglione and Machiavelli, humanism has a large influence on their writings. Humanism is the study of the ability to improve the quality of life on Earth for humans by teaching and studying the classics of Ancient Greece and Rome. Comparing the main traits that these three men discuss, the values that they admired from the Renaissance and Colonial periods will not greatly differ from today’s ideal person. Machiavelli valued the unpleasant truth, always having control, and being nice even when one doesn’t want to. Castiglione admired the traits of admitting your fictitious facts before one speaks, the ability to quickly solve arguments, and creating physical and mental strength. George Washington believed in candor, the ability to see both sides of an argument and still hold your own opinion, and having the capability to admit to your wrongdoing when…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli was a political philosopher who lived in Florence, Italy during the Rennaisance. While in exile, and hoping for political employment, he wrote The Prince, in which he claimed that humans, inherently corrupt, must be ruled by a prince who prioritizes effective government over morality and ethics. Watching his home of Italy falling into disarray under weak and divided government, Machiavelli criticized Christian ideals of princes by claiming that “one who abandons what is done for what ought to be done” is welcoming destruction. Examples of his rejection of Christian values in favor of necessary political policies are his instruction that it is “safer to be feared than loved,” and his advice that a leader (in his case a prince) skilled in deceit will “always find those who allow themselves to be deceived.” His…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli is the “heir… to civic humanism” because he is keenly aware that any advice towards the ruling elite may be seen as a threat, and so he must validate his opinions through the use of examples from romanticized ancient Rome and Greece to show that his opinions were not an issue, but the truth behind them which would remain true even at his death or expulsion threatened the stability of any government. As is the case with Renaissance humanism, Machiavelli drew comparisons from knowledge of the ancient world to the world in which he lived, evaluating each based on each other. He took particular interest in the actions of the leaders, specifically the key points in history which led to their rise to and fall from power. He attempts to create rules or guidelines for future leaders to follow based on any consistencies he saw, giving him the title of “heir…to civic humanism.” Without further inquiry here it is impossible to say to what extent Machiavelli romanticized the ancient times, as he may have been picking and choosing stories which best aligned with his views, omitting contrary evidence, or he may have been using all the works available to him at the time.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Italian cities, there was much conflict and arguments amongst the Borgia family who were focused on trying to seize and maintain power. Machiavelli in response, devised a text, The Prince, which illustrates how to run an effectual government. In The Prince, he also describes how the good and effective rulers have to learn “not to be good,” and that they have to be prepared and willing to put aside ethical concerns of justice and kindness, in order to preserve the balance of the state. This logic was atrocious to peers around him, for they were used to the old medieval ideas of ruling where the king was chosen by God to serve as someone on earth, who manages the law. They also saw that the ruler/king was an all-powerful human being with…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Renaissance when Machiavelli lived, there was an explosion of humanism and free thinking that focused on the individual person. In writing The Prince, Machiavelli exercised his right to say what he pleased and to let the world hear it.Just like the people around him, Machiavelli was focusing on himself and his goals, abilities, and views, no matter how cruel they might seem. In this way Machiavelli was swept up into the Renaissance spirit. While other people wrote…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccilò Machiavelli’s political philosophy writing, The Prince, is a piece of writing that intends to teach an upcoming prince an approach of ruling that can guarantee a lasting period of power. Machiavelli states that the number one characteristic that a prince must posse that of virtue. Machiavelli defined virtue as a way that a prince acquires power over a dominion, and later goes on to add to the define by stating that “it is necessary for a prince if he wishes to maintain himself, to learn to be able to be not good.” (Machiavelli 87), which highlights an aspect of cruelty that Machiavelli then contradicts with an example of the wicked Agathocles. Machiavelli’s inclusion of cruelty in his definition of virtue and his contradicting examples demonstrate his dispassionate analysis and overall apathetic perception on 16th century rulers.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    His guide on how to be an effective leader, The Prince, encourages the prince to do whatever it takes to achieve your goal. Machiavelli one of the great thinkers of the Italian Renaissance. In 1498, he was appointed chancellor of the Second Chancery, which is the foreign affairs department. Later he was appointed the secretary to the Council of Ten, the department of War. He later served as foreign ambassador to several courts of Europe. In 1512, When the Medici returned from their exile, they returned to power and Machiavelli lost his job, because he was considered an enemy of the Medici. This was unfair to Machiavelli, which later brought him with the idea of being an effective leader. Machiavelli was imprisoned and tortured but later was allowed to leave Florence when Giovanni, Lorenzo dé Medici’s son, was elected Pope Leo X in 1513 since the Medici family significantly impacted Italy. He spent the next fifteen years…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccoli Vs Machiavelli

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When many leaders rise into power they think about how they will rule and whether it is better to be loved or feared as a leader. It is better for a leader to be loved than to be feared because when you lose in battle or cannot deal with chaos in times of defeat or trouble, your people will turn against you and revolt. According to Niccolo Machiavelli it is better for a leader to be feared than to be loved, if they cannot be both. Niccolo Machiavelli was a Renaissance humanist and Italian political and military theorist. Niccolo Machiavelli wrote the Prince as a guide book on ruling based on his experiences working for the government of Florence, he hoped to win the favor of the Medici family, who was the ruler of Florence…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    His goal was to bring back the unity and strength that Italy had, and revive the past glories of the Roman empire. This was a time where civic humanism took rise. Machiavelli began writing political tracts by bringing out the sinful and evil qualities of human nature. His most famous work was called “The Prince” written in 1513. This was the very first political theory writing. It was a set of principles suggested to princes or people in power on how to rule and how to maintain peace and security, while seeking fame and honor. Some principles include, “It is safer to be feared than be loved” (pg.130), “A prince must learn how to act the part of a beast sometimes, he should make the fox and the lion his patterns”(pg.131), and “a prince ought to read history and to pay particular attention to the achievements of great generals and the cause of their victories and defeats but above all he should follow the example of those great men who when they select a model resolve to follow in his steps” (pg.128). His principles reflect the value and concerns of Renaissance humanism because they address the proper way to rule a state. They reflect that a government be best ruled with a strong control and training citizens in moral…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli was a historian and deeply involved himself in politics, and he wrote his Discourses on Livy with a desire to bring back the virtues of the ancient Roman republic and in the hopes that they could be applied to Italy in the 16th century.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays