Ethics Of Dumping Essay

Good Essays
In an ethical manner, it is not morally right to endanger another person 's life in order to make a profit, as it creates more harms than benefits. Companies are dumping dangerous and hazardous products on overseas markets and it should be in the company’s best interest to consider the health and safety of the people and animals. Therefore, the companies acted immorally by dumping harmful products. 

In essence, dumping refers to the procedure of exporting products that have been banned dangerous in the US, to other countries, mainly third world countries. The harms clearly outweigh the benefits, as these manufactures are knowingly dumping dangerous products available to third world countries. The first dumping that the case study Made in the
…show more content…
Dumping products in third world countries is a moral problem. The companies which manufactured these products are searching profitable venues only; they are not considering the consequences to the people that might be affected. The only benefactors are the companies who make profit, not the people in the poor countries who will be affected nor the environment and animals. If a product is regarded as unsafe to sell in the United States, then it should never be allowed to be dumped into other counties. First because, it is still considered unsafe no matter which country it is in. Second, third world countries are not any less human than first world countries. Third, the harms of continuing to use, sell or produce those products are both harmful for the people and the environment. Another issue that arises from the dumping of products is that people in first world countries, especially those driven by greed, don’t seem to value the life of poor people. There is a lack of respect for a person who is poor and has the disadvantage of living in a third world country. Even though there is still danger and damage in third world countries, companies shouldn 't try to make it worse by dumping, they should instead be helping and making the world a safer and toxic free

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Corporations don’t have minds, body and soul; they can’t be imprisoned or rehabilitated. In order to find someone guilty of criminal liability, you need mens rea, the intention behind the act. Corporations don’t have intentions, their officers do. Corporations also can’t be held responsible for the crimes of other people since they have no way of fully controlling each and every one of their employees. If an employee acts with his freewill against the corporate policy and negligently harms another person, the Corporation should not face any liability because that is unjust.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ethical egoism states that the only moral actions are those that increase one’s well-being. If Michael and Jim were both about to get promoted but only one of them got the desired raise, Michael being an egoist would want to hurt Jim, or even kill him, in order to get that raise. Ethical egoism would justify this action and consider it moral because it increased Michael’s well-being. “Egoism may require for people to do immoral actions” such as murder (Shafer-Landau 107). This is fatal to ethical egoism because immoral actions done in self interest of ethical egoism are still immoral.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ethical egoism varies from other ethical positions since it proposes that the enthusiasm of others anything to never be an element in good choice making. An ethical egoist accepts that helping others is not an ethical activity and that they anything to help other people just seeing that it would offer an advantage over the long haul. If it does not better me I “morally” do not have to do it. So, if killing, torturing, or robbing someone will help me better myself then morally right. The book claims that ethical egoism cannot be true because it requires killing rape, or theft just because actions of this promote self- interest.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Argument Against Gun Ban

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    These bans are ineffective and hurt Americans more than they help them, which is the opposite of the purpose of these bans. They prevent citizens from having a useful tool in their home or on their person and puts them at a great risk for being fatally wounded by a criminal. Those who own a gun are personally responsible for their actions that involve it and should be held to a certain standard, there is no perfect answer to the dilemma to the person holding the gun but it is certain that banning guns is not the…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Clearly, we missed the mark and apologize. We did not intend to make light of any serious issue. We are pulling the content and halting any further rollout. We also apologize for putting Kendall Jenner in this position.”A business should always be very mindful that they are not appropriating in their advertising to the public. The public was offended by the manipulative tactics used by the corporation in efforts to profit from social injustice.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case Study Uluru

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pollution is a big tourism disadvantage, as no one wants to come to a place covered in rubbish. Pollution is not only bad for the environment but also for the economic values. People don’t want to pay $15-$65 to see a polluted landscape. It will also affect the aesthetic values, as if f the environment is polluted then no one would want to see what an astonishing site was and now a polluted, dirty place. Pollution can also kill the plants and wildlife, as if an animal eats plastic then there are very low percentage that animal will…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    We must also hold our government accountable to enforce the laws against the illegal trafficking and use of illegal workers. Purchasing our goods from companies that do not use illegal trafficking workers is a better alternative than creating a boycott not to buy products from companies that use illegal human trafficking victim workers. If we buy from someone else that doesn’t use the trafficking victims, it will cause the companies to do the right thing by stopping the use of illegal human trafficking workers because they suffer from loss of sales. During this time, the competitor is doing well not using the trafficking victims. When the companies stop using them, the trafficker has not market to send the victims to thus it is no longer profitable for them.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The populists wanted to attack this because they saw the flaws in their rhetoric, and knew ultimately the workers were not most important, but profit and gains were paramount. It’s exploitative and manipulative on account of the corporations. They’ve also managed to perpetuate the negatives of an economic system in which it is nearly impossible to leave, because reverting to a way of life that is based on being totally self-sustaining is unrealistic. And while at this point there is obviously no return, constricting the size and control these corporations have, not just over the government or the market, but also over their employees, is critical in maintaining capitalism that is in the best interests of the…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Corruption does not happen because of the four pillars concept but because of the people itself. Corruption is an act of misused position in order to enrich themselves, or groups. Corruption at state government level is very detrimental because it would increase poverty level of a country. In addition, the country would experience a big material loss. Corruption is advantageous for oneself, but have a negative impact on the public and the state (Musdaliva, 2015).…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Finally, we hear the argument that our treatment of the environment shows the lengths in which we will be immoral for wealth. However, we have seen businesses turn away from harmful means of production to a healthier alternative. Ultimately, Gandhi is wrong when he says that wealth and morality cannot mix. Wealth does not decay or halt moral and social progress in the societies of the…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays