The Lemon Test- http://www.pewforum.org/2009/05/14/shifting-boundaries6/ Aguilar v. Felton (1985). Was a federal program that paid New York City public school teachers to provide remedial instruction to students who lived in low-income neighborhoods. The teachers delivered these services at public and private schools, a substantial number of which were religious. Aguilar required the government to monitor whether the government-funded teachers incorporated religious content into their secular instruction.
Slander- http://www.nytimes.com/1983/06/04/arts/cbs-slander-case-goes-to-jury-in-los-angeles.html CBS Slander Case Goes To Jury In Los Angeles- The monthlong trial involving a doctor who sued Dan Rather and CBS for slander over a segment of ''60 Minutes'' that linked him to insurance fraud went to the jury today. In his closing argument, William Vaughn, a lawyer for CBS, said the doctor, Carl A. Galloway, ''was up to his nose …show more content…
The decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment extends beyond federal enclaves to the states, which was addressed later by McDonald v. Chicago (2010). It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense
Grand Jury- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurtado_v._California Hurtado vs California- The judge examined the information and determined that Hurtado should be brought to trial. Hurtado was tried, convicted of murder, and sentenced to death. At issue was whether or not the 14th Amendment's Due Process Clause extended to the states the 5th Amendment's Indictment Clause requiring indictment by grand
Slander- http://www.nytimes.com/1983/06/04/arts/cbs-slander-case-goes-to-jury-in-los-angeles.html CBS Slander Case Goes To Jury In Los Angeles- The monthlong trial involving a doctor who sued Dan Rather and CBS for slander over a segment of ''60 Minutes'' that linked him to insurance fraud went to the jury today. In his closing argument, William Vaughn, a lawyer for CBS, said the doctor, Carl A. Galloway, ''was up to his nose …show more content…
The decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment extends beyond federal enclaves to the states, which was addressed later by McDonald v. Chicago (2010). It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense
Grand Jury- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurtado_v._California Hurtado vs California- The judge examined the information and determined that Hurtado should be brought to trial. Hurtado was tried, convicted of murder, and sentenced to death. At issue was whether or not the 14th Amendment's Due Process Clause extended to the states the 5th Amendment's Indictment Clause requiring indictment by grand