Roper V. Simmons Opinion Case Study

Improved Essays
Case name: Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987)
Facts: Ardith McPherson was appointed a deputy in the Constable’s office of Harris County, Texas, on January 12, 1981. Her duties were only clerical. On March 30, 1981, McPherson discussed with her boyfriend, and fellow employee, a report about an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States. She made the remark “If they go for him again, I hope they get him”. Her remark was reported to Constable Rankin, who fired McPherson, even though she told him she did not mean anything by it.
Procedural History: McPherson filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, alleging that Rankin had violated her constitutional rights, and she
…show more content…
Case Name: Roper v. Simmons Opinion, 543 U.S. 551 (2005)
Facts: Christopher Simmons, at the age of 17, planned and perpetrated burglary and murder. Christopher and his friend kidnapped Shirley Cook, tied her hands and feet with electrical wire, covered her face in duct tape, and threw her over a bridge. The next day her body was found in the river. After Simmons bragged to his friends about murdering Cook, Simmons was arrested and confessed to the murder.
Procedural History: Simmons was tried as an adult and charged with burglary, kidnapping, stealing, and first degree murder. There were no witnesses called by the defense. In mitigation, Simmons’ attorneys called an officer and his family to testify on his behalf. The defense counsel addressed his age, however, the trial judged accepted the recommendation of the death penalty. Simmons obtained new counsel because of ineffective assistance of counsel, but was denied the motion for post conviction relief.
Issue Presented: Whether it is lawful under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution to execute a juvenile offender who was older than 15 but younger than 18 when he committed a capital

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The actuality of the case of State v. Stewart consist of a variety of mental, physical and emotional abuse in which Peggy Stewart had been “pushed” in her own mind to kill her husband to escape from his toxic and cruel behavior. As a result, the facts of the case are a wide variety that contributed to Peggy’s “imminent danger” state of mind when deciding whether her actions were truly self-defense. These include the abuse at hand, physiological trauma that Peggy experienced, and professional opinions about Peggy’s actions. An important factor of the case is Peggy Stewart’s significant abuse by her husband, Mike. Additionally, Mike’s abuse was not only to Peggy; but also to her daughter, Carla.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marin Sinzer Case Study

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    While the “criminal is a child” approach to the juvenile justice system is appealing due to its forgiving nature and emphasis on rehabilitation rather than punishment, there are some cases in which this decision is not so cut-and-dry. One of these instances of a legal “gray area” is the case of Marin Sinzer, who was charged for the murder of Tammy Shevin, 25 years after the crime was committed. The now 38 year old is petitioning to be tried as a juvenile, since he was only 13 at the time of the crime, a year younger than the waiver age at the time. While many proponents of the “criminal is a child” approach take that stance because of the physical and psychological dangers posed to juveniles who are placed in adult prisons, in this unique…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    MOSHER V BENSON BACKGROUND: At the age of 17 Kyle Mosher purchased a car from Peter Benson. The motion before the court was to have the matter set aside due to the plaintiff being a minor. Mosher had requested that the contract be reversed since he was a minor at the time the car was purchased and further stated that the vehicle was not in roadworthy condition and therefore had to pay and excessive price for the vehicle. According to the British Columbia Infants Act Subsection 27 (a) An adult, who at the time he or she entered a contract was an infant, can reject the contract if (c) he or she gives, oral or written notice of rejection to another party to the contract within one year after reaching the age of majority.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The writ states that as a private citizen of the United States, Mary Surratt is entitled to a civilian trial; and the current military trial is unwarranted, making the verdict unlawful (Turner). The writ is sent to the president, who responds by suspending the right of habeas corpus for the…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During this hearing the juvenile court determined that Stanford could not be rehabilitated with in the juvenile justice system. Under Kentucky Revised Statute, the juvenile court jurisdiction could be waived and an offender tried as an adult if he was either charge with a Class A felony or capital crime, or was over 16 years of age and charged with a felony. The juvenile court found certification for trial as an adult to be in the best interest of the petitioner and the community. Therefore, Kelvin case was transferred to adult trial court where he were convicted of murder, first-degree sodomy, first-degree robbery and receiving stolen property, and was sentenced to…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cole Cannon Case Summary

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The U.S. Supreme Court would judge the case on whether sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life in prison without parole violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). Miller’s counsel argued that sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole without considering certain factors such as his age violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments’ ban on cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). The state of Alabama argued that punishing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole does not violate the Eight or Fourteenth Amendment, but serves a justifiable penological goal when the crime is aggravated murder (Carrizales & Schultz,…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Bobby Phoenix, an expert on batter woman syndrome, Sidney Miller, M.D, Physician at New Columbia Hospital Center, as well as the defendant, Dominique Stephens herself. On the side of the prosecution we have Detective Dana Hughes, from the Metropolitan Police Department, and Jordan Bright, Dominque Stephen’s sibling. The evidence presented at trial are the Metropolitan Police Department Statement, New Columbia Hospital Records, and a picture of the pistol used to kill Donovan Stephens. I decided to accept witness, Dr. Bobby Phoenix, as a professional on battered women syndrome. I’m basing his expertise on the fact that he is the Executive Director of the National Center for Women’s studies, he has a Ph.D. in Psychology from Georgetown University where he also teaches about domestic violence, and he is very knowledgeable on the subject.…

    • 2831 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the privacy of students comes into question there are mixed responses, especially when it comes to the contents of a student’s bag. From the landmark supreme court case TLO v. New Jersey, the privacy students have in school has inevitably come into question. Whether TLO or New Jersey was right, this court case changed the way we look at students and their privacy. Some may argue that students have no privacy in school while others may think they have too much. Has the Supreme Court already decided where they stand on this hot button topic?…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas vs. Johnson (An analysis of the supreme court case Texas vs. Johnson and the current repercussions of the decision) The first amendment protects many of our basic rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, etc. The framers of our constitution left a broad wording to leave room for our country to grow and change as time went on. One of the adjustments our country has made over time is to define the actions and words protected under the freedom of speech. There are three basic categories of free speech; pure speech, is communication only through words, speech plus is speech plus an aid such as a sign or a chant, and symbolic speech, an action that communicates meaning without the use of words.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Simmons, I disagree with the Supreme Court’s decision in favor of Simmons. I believe that Simmons deserves the death penalty, there was no reason in Simmons’ claims and agreement about how the execution of minors violate the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Yet, the defendant premeditated the crime and did not consider the victims’ life. The defendant enters into the victim’s home, robbed the victim, then tied up the victim and threw the victim off a bridge. In addition, the defendant stated that he assured that he would get away with the crime because he was minor.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Re Gault Case Essay

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This case changed my outlook far as execution of juveniles. This case involved Simmons a young man that had a murder charge. I feel at age 17 you should be aware of our actions and with the fact that he bragged about the killing was an eye-opener to think of the possibility that this individual could have had mental issues or suffered some type of abuse as a youngster, that may have caused him to carry out this act of violence. I don’t feel he should have been executed due to these possibilities; however, a tough sentence should have been enacted. This case changed the development of sentencing anyone under the age of 18 to death it was ruled cruel and usual punishment.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Has the court sentenced the minor due to the evidence presented and the extent of the case? (Aggravated Murder). Miller argues, these amendments have been violated because of his age, while the state argues, the crime was determined aggravated murder, and so sentencing is justifiable and appropriate. Throughout the trail similar cases such as Roper v. Simmons (2005), and Graham v. Florida (2010), worked in Miller’s favor by using the information in the trail. Roper v. Simmons was a cased based on, if juveniles were able to be sentenced to the death penalty due to a murder.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Children committing heinous crimes are not a rare occurrence anymore; the upsetting reality requires new tactics for dealing with young juveniles. Some Americans believe children should be tried as adults, yet others feel that they are too young to understand their wrong doings. In most conditions minors are quickly told they are too young or too old for something, however before being sent to an adult facility we need to contemplate all aspects of the case in order to decided whether or not being tried as an adult is necessary. Regardless of the crime, some people feel that an adult facility is not a suitable environment for children to serve their sentences.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Who can be executed? Under the Eighth Amendment, the punishment must be related to the crime, so the execution is appropriate for all murder cases. The new death penalty laws require judges and juries to consider aggravating and mitigating factors in each capita case and to apply the death to all heinous crimes. The Eighth Amendment finds justice should be served in all heinous crimes and those may be sentenced to death.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the article Death Penalty for Teens, Frank W. Heft JR thinks that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment for teens. While David Smith thinks that the death penalty for teens is not cruel and unusual punishment, they both have different views points about this matter and they do not agree. Heft and Smith disagree on juvenile capital punishment in three different areas, physical maturity which includes age, state law versus federal law, and emotional maturity that refers to the ability to understand, and manage their emotions and the ability to respond to the environment in the appropriate manner. Because of their disagreement on age maturity, and emotional maturity, federal law and states law, it leaves the reader undecided…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays