Essay On Rousseau's The Social Contract

Improved Essays
Capitalism’s Corruption:
The Incompatibility of Capitalism and Democracy Rousseau’s The Social Contract is one of the most important political writings in modern history. In this work Rousseau explains the radical and revolutionary ideas of modern democracy. These ideas would inspire the people of France during the French Revolution and the founding of the United States government. While the United States was inspired by Rousseau’s ideas found in the Social Contract, the founding fathers ignored a crucial idea; capitalism is not compatible with democracy. In this paper I will be discussing Rousseau’s ideas of how private interests, which is the basis of capitalism, disrupts democracy and how a democratic citizen must think of not just oneself but also one’s society. Citizenship in a democracy means that one must rise above man’s animalistic natures and to think for the common good. The animalistic nature in man is not as hard to find as one may hope. In the Social Contract, Rousseau explains how the state of natural man is selfish, stupid, and individualistic. To be a citizen in a democratic society one must let go of his need of oneself and instead be focused on the need of the general wellbeing of society. Rousseau explains the differences
…show more content…
In democracy the ideas of supporting society as a whole and the idea that community is more important than self-interest. This is the not the case in capitalism; it is expected for a capitalist to do whatever is necessary to get ahead in the world. The citizen of a democracy is well versed in public events and affairs and uses a vote to help better society as a whole, while the capitalist is only interested in which candidate will support one’s self-interests. Rousseau was very harsh toward self-interest in government for a reason. When self-interest is involved the betterment of society falls to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jean Jacques Rousseau’s “The Social Contract” and the Declaration of Independence might at first appear as two heavily similar literary works. But in fact, the United States, Thomas Jefferson specifically, inferred heavily to Mr. Rousseau’s works in the drafting of the Declaration of Independence. These similarities are very evident as both documents demonstrate that without the consent of the governed there is to be no government. The question, however, is what specifically did Mr. Rousseau’s writings influence on the Declaration of Independence and what were the specific instances where the Declaration displayed influence.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If men are equal, as Jean-Jacques Rousseau claims in the preface to his discourse on inequality (40), why do some men live in large lavish houses, while others struggle on the street, unsure of their next meal? The distance between the rich and the poor has been increasing steadily over the last decade, but in reality it has been expanding ever since man separated from Rousseau’s original state of nature. The state of nature is different than that which is natural, and within Rousseau’s state of nature, physical inequality is the only thing separating a man from another. Therefore, disregarding physical inequality, nature for man was equal and the state of nature provided an equal playing ground. As early as the preface, Rousseau realizes that in order for one to understand inequality, one must first attempt to understand man (39).…

    • 1335 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This publication was more accomplishing than the First Discourse; its content was what made Rousseau fall into the category of an Enlightenment thinker. The start of Rousseau developing his theories of “human social development and moral psychology”(Stanford Encyclopedia) can be seen. Rousseau discusses about two types of inequality: moral and natural (or physical). In the first half of the Discourse of Inequality, “The natural man is well balanced by his two trends, pity (which pushes it to the other) and self-preservation (which isolates). In marital status, laws and virtues play the roles of these two instincts” (Tim).…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper I am going to summarize Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality” in which Rousseau theorizes that inequality is not a natural event, but an unfortunate byproduct of modern life. I will then provide a criticism of Rousseau’s argument, focusing on his decision to not discuss the relationship between natural and moral inequality. This criticism will then be countered by a theorized response from Rousseau’s perspective. The general argument presented by Rousseau is that the establishment of civil society and the associated progress of humanity is the underlying cause for the inequality between men.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The history of colonial America and the colonists’ erudite actions to gain their independence from Britain has served as a microcosm in history to display how the American Revolution was crucial and influenced several movements around the world such as the French Revolution. Some might even argue that the French Revolution also inspired European revolutionary movements and the Russian Revolution around the 1940s. The thirteen colonies altered the way they were being run and developed a unique form of a democratic government after colonists saw interference by the British as denial and restriction of their simple rights that other British subjects possessed without any limitations. The entire world was in awe after witnessing the thirteen colonies…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Rousseau’s argument, men cannot be as free as they are in the state of nature in modern society and asserts that that institutions and structures in modern society contradict the freedom and natural goodness of man. Yet, a specific government may be able to provide its members with a certain amount of freedom that somewhat amounts to that present in the state of nature. He writes, in regards to the role of government, “Find a form of association which defends and protects with all common forces the person and goods of each associate, and by means of which each one, while uniting with all, nevertheless obeys only himself and remains as free as before” (Rousseau, 148). The ultimate goal of the government is to ensure the natural freedom of its societal members. The law put forth from the government should be a reflection of the general will of the community.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The purpose of law for Rousseau is to communicate the general will of the people. The general will of the people puts the common interest of all involved at the forefront. Whereas in the state of nature there was a sense of inequality, once the social contract is in effect there is equality as everyone is needed for the common good to take place. In order for these laws to be enacted the majority must agree to give up their individual rights for the protection of all. The sovereign hopes to serve the common good while putting private interest last.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indeed, Rousseau believed in the equity within the members of the society. He showed the close relationship between equality and freedom in his writing, especially in his book “The Social Contract”(1762). According to him, the nature of man is resistant to inequality by nature; it does not have to confront others, asking them to prove anything. Far from seeking concrete ways to achieve a society that respects freedom, Rousseau seeks a universal standard by which to judge the legitimacy of companies. According to his beliefs, “men are born free, their liberty belong to them, and no one…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau considers a legitimate government to be one that “defends and protects with all common forces the person and goods of each associate, and, by means…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ultimately, one would be better off rejecting the government and returning to the State of Nature, with hopes of constructing a better civil government in the future. Jean-Jacques Rousseau had two complementary social contract theories. The first one, clearly expressed in his Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Men (Second Discourse), and the second one on The Social Contract published in 1762. According to Rousseau, the State of Nature was some sort of peaceful idealistic place. People lived solitary and uncomplicated lives.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs. Rousseau

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this paper, I will be analyzing and explaining the way that Hobbes and Rousseau’s ideas regarding the national condition of human beings differ. In my exegesis, I will be discussing how in Leviathan (ch. 13), Hobbes takes a stance regarding egoism, the idea that man always acts in their own interest. I will also be discussing the fact that Rousseau is fundamentally opposed to the ideas in which Hobbes presents. Rousseau believes that society taints the fundamental core beliefs of mankind. I will then present the critical point of this paper: the fact that the two philosophers have very conflicting viewpoints on the concept of human nature.…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau observes human nature as innately good when it’s extracted from all social attachments and the immensely corrupting overall influence of society itself. Society, for Rousseau in his eyes is a grand impulse where the decencies of human beings are displayed. Rousseau 's political theories are derived from the seemingly simple idea of arranging humans into a social setting that’s bare of corrupting elements of society. Rousseau 's leap toward a social and political order of amour propre over amour de soi is evidence of this. Rousseau derives a substantial amount of his beliefs from morals such as equality.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The sovereign exercises legislative power, but a government is needed to exercise executive power. Although Rousseau and Marx share similarities in their thoughts regarding how property and property ownership separates society into different classes, Marx is more radical thinker. He is more concerned with the economics portion of property and society, rather than politics like Rousseau. Marx doesn 't want property to be a part of politics, while Rousseau 's theory regarding the emergence of society is based solely off of that. Marx believes private property should be…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Social Contract Rousseau speaks of the ideal government; this ideal government would be like the aristocracy, that the wisest are those who should be in power. Because in this way, the society is not going to be full of vices and selfishness where the strongest, is the one who has the power over the weak. Since democracy is utopic, because in this political system, all citizens should be governing and that is not possible; in addition to that, in a society sadly not everyone is prepared to be govern or to elect a president. Specifically in the case of United Stated and many democracies around the world have a democratic system full of vices because under my point of view, most of those who are in power are not prepared; as they get there,…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics