Best Form Of Government Essay

Improved Essays
The best form of government for a society is the democratic system. Most people will agree with me, because it is the form of government that presents greatest strengths and benefits to the Human Being, but also present certain dangers, such as that depends on the opinion and participation of the most. How can this be a disadvantage? Well, if the majority is not adequately prepared to think freely and reflectively, this will be the first step to destroy the best system of government today. That is why I think that Rousseau in the Social Contract expresses the Best Form of Government. In the Social Contract Rousseau speaks of the ideal government; this ideal government would be like the aristocracy, that the wisest are those who should be in power. Because in this way, the society is not going to be full of vices and selfishness where the strongest, is the one who has the power over the weak. Since democracy is utopic, because in this political system, all citizens should be governing and that is not possible; in addition to that, in a society sadly not everyone is prepared to be govern or to elect a president. Specifically in the case of United Stated and many democracies around the world have a democratic system full of vices because under my point of view, most of those who are in power are not prepared; as they get there, …show more content…
The objective of this contract is that the people have the power, the government only the administration. I think it would be ideal to have a State that operates under that system but the reality is that this type of government is very difficult to subsist, as it is very easy to fall into vices because “the man is inherently selfish and seeks to have the power.” (Niccolo Machiavelli.) In addition to that the social contract is flawed if you can affect the freedom of the people, and consistent with his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It is the best form of government because the people have the right to vote and have an opinion of the laws and e.t.c. Democracy lets people decide who they want for ruler and the laws they want. Democracy is the best form of government. In conclusion democracy is the best form of government without it we wouldn 't be fair. Abraham Lincoln once stated, "Democracy is the government, of the people, for the people and by the…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The founders of the United States had many hard choices to make when deciding to “form a more perfect union” with the Constitution. They had to make a federal government that would be acceptable not only to the common people but to the naysayers as well. If they did not satisfy the needs of the people, then they would not be able to trade and be recognized as a power on the world market. The founders needed a way to convey this to the citizens of the United States and make them interested in helping to make the country they were forming great. By incorporating into the Constitution the duties and work schedule of the Congress, they could persuade citizens into helping with the decision making process.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first principle Paul Bartow explains is Good Government Requires Understanding Human Nature[1]. In this section, he argues about humans ruling the government results on "a spectrum between two extremes: despotism and democracy"[1] What he means by that is that human nature can not effectively demonstrate a true democracy, or it will result in despotism, which is what the governments are like in several parts of the world. He states that democracy requires the large participation of the society. I agree with this argument because democracy means nothing without the participation of people, but even with the participation of people, it can still be…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the dawn of time, every civilization on earth has had some sort of leader role in their society. Native Americans had elders and leaders, kingdoms had kings and queens, and finally modern society has presidents and the government. Every government is different in each nation on the earth. Some of the governments act as a person who the citizens discuss with about politics.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Origin of Inequality, Rousseau describes the evolution into society almost like a trickster (the rich) fooling his mark (the poor). In time, individuals would amass land and cattle at the sake of another, leading to “dominion and slavery, or violence and rapine” (Rousseau 1755, 29). This series of conflicts prompted the rich into devising a plan to “employ in his favour the forces of those who attacked him” and to “give them other institutions as favourable to himself as the law of nature was unfavourable” (Rousseau 1755, 30). These institutions which the rich persuaded the poor into entering came the society that brought them out of the State of Nature. The impetus for moving from the prior state to the society was one of greed on part…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    How is the Constitution written to guarantee that the government will be, and forever remain, limited in power? The Constitution was written upon the six principles to ensure our government would forever be with limited power to protect the United States of America. A limited government is a political system that legalized force is restricted to enumerated powers. The idea of a limited government is related to political thinkers, who used a unique way of showing emphasis to prevent government from having all power. Some wanted to connect divine law and natural law; others wanted a social compact to establish the government, to protect property and natural rights.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    American Government The United States is one of the most powerful country in the world, and the government of the U.S. is also very powerful. Government of any country makes all the important decisions and, is responsible of how the country is; good or bad, strong or powerful. However, like a coin has two sides to it, the government also has two sides to it: one side of the government is where they make good decisions, and makes the country and the citizens of the country feel proud of it, and another side is where the government makes wrong decisions and might hurt the citizens’ rights. Therefore, we the people, citizens of America have become educated with how the government works, and what is good and bad about it. There are many good things about American government as well as some mistakes of the government, and we will look at some of them.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Government Essay

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this paper I will be responding to the second prompt by reflecting on the role of government in American life. I will firstly discuss my personal reasons on why America has a government and satisfaction of the ways government functions. Secondly I will discuss on areas in which I believe government does too much or too little. Lastly I will discuss whether or not a government should focus on morality or economics when deciding public policy. To expand on these points, I will provide examples and issues.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Rousseau’s argument, men cannot be as free as they are in the state of nature in modern society and asserts that that institutions and structures in modern society contradict the freedom and natural goodness of man. Yet, a specific government may be able to provide its members with a certain amount of freedom that somewhat amounts to that present in the state of nature. He writes, in regards to the role of government, “Find a form of association which defends and protects with all common forces the person and goods of each associate, and by means of which each one, while uniting with all, nevertheless obeys only himself and remains as free as before” (Rousseau, 148). The ultimate goal of the government is to ensure the natural freedom of its societal members. The law put forth from the government should be a reflection of the general will of the community.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau believes that a social contract is needed in order to preserve the community as it is becoming hard for everyone to survive on their resources…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Social contract theory is based on the view that our moral and political obligations depended on a widely held agreement to form our current society. The benefit to living in this type of arrangement is that it protects our most basic rights. One of the drawbacks is that it is up to society as a whole to create some kind of balance between moral responsibility and personal freedom. So for a price (limited freedom) we receive in exchange a government who promises to protect us from people who might want to harm us.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ultimately, one would be better off rejecting the government and returning to the State of Nature, with hopes of constructing a better civil government in the future. Jean-Jacques Rousseau had two complementary social contract theories. The first one, clearly expressed in his Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Men (Second Discourse), and the second one on The Social Contract published in 1762. According to Rousseau, the State of Nature was some sort of peaceful idealistic place. People lived solitary and uncomplicated lives.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to judge a situation using Social Contract theory, we have to understand a few principles behind the theory first. These include the Social Contract, John Rawl 's Principle of Justice, and the Difference Principle. Using these three ideas, we can determine what constitutes a community of people, what makes a moral rule correct, and which correct moral rules would be accepted by a community of people. The Social Contract is this idea that when people come together to form a community, moral rules must be agreed upon that benefit everyone in the community. Not only that, but the Social Contract needs some kind of established governing body to enforce the agreed upon rules.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays