Rousseau's Discourse On The Origin Of Inequality

Great Essays
In this paper I am going to summarize Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality” in which Rousseau theorizes that inequality is not a natural event, but an unfortunate byproduct of modern life. I will then provide a criticism of Rousseau’s argument, focusing on his decision to not discuss the relationship between natural and moral inequality. This criticism will then be countered by a theorized response from Rousseau’s perspective. The general argument presented by Rousseau is that the establishment of civil society and the associated progress of humanity is the underlying cause for the inequality between men. His answer to questions regarding the inequality of men, and the necessary supporting information, is presented …show more content…
Rousseau’s “savage man” is essentially an animal in human form, living in nature among the wildlife and the elements, his body as his only tool, non-communicative with others, his instincts placing survival over interpersonal relationships, and pity serving as a surrogate for law. Mentally the savage man is very simple, knowing only food, sex, rest, and pain, and whether to desire or avoid these events. Rousseau further compares this version of humanity to the modern man, noting that “in becoming habituated to the ways of society and a slave, he becomes fearful, and servile; his soft and effeminate lifestyle completes the enervation of both his strength and his courage” and even contends that “the difference between the savage man and the domesticated man should still be greater than that between the savage animal and the domesticated animal” (pg. 23). Even the lack of a communicative language was a benefit to the savage man, keeping him free of civil societies, personal relationships, and a sense of duty to others. The savage man was free to follow his instincts and roam the land as he saw fit, only guided by the need for self-preservation and only limited by uncontrollable natural

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If men are equal, as Jean-Jacques Rousseau claims in the preface to his discourse on inequality (40), why do some men live in large lavish houses, while others struggle on the street, unsure of their next meal? The distance between the rich and the poor has been increasing steadily over the last decade, but in reality it has been expanding ever since man separated from Rousseau’s original state of nature. The state of nature is different than that which is natural, and within Rousseau’s state of nature, physical inequality is the only thing separating a man from another. Therefore, disregarding physical inequality, nature for man was equal and the state of nature provided an equal playing ground. As early as the preface, Rousseau realizes that in order for one to understand inequality, one must first attempt to understand man (39).…

    • 1335 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This publication was more accomplishing than the First Discourse; its content was what made Rousseau fall into the category of an Enlightenment thinker. The start of Rousseau developing his theories of “human social development and moral psychology”(Stanford Encyclopedia) can be seen. Rousseau discusses about two types of inequality: moral and natural (or physical). In the first half of the Discourse of Inequality, “The natural man is well balanced by his two trends, pity (which pushes it to the other) and self-preservation (which isolates). In marital status, laws and virtues play the roles of these two instincts” (Tim).…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Savage man could not deceive, depend, or desire material things because these concepts did not exist in the state of nature. In all actuality humans were only really forced to interact with each other in very limited situations and the most common being to reproduce. Rousseau states that “the savage lives in himself; the man accustomed to the ways of society is always outside himself and knows how to live only in the opinion of others.” Rousseau states that contemporary human relations are based on individual interests and not necessarily the well being of the individual unlike the social relationships the concept of self-preservation that dominates the state of…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ABSTRACT Explorations of philosophical ideas on the most suitable and ideal state has been variously conceived in contemporary political thoughts. The general will, having its origins in theological debates, ultimately became one of the most celebrated and denigrated concepts emerging from early modern political thought. For which Jean-Jacques Rousseau made it the central element of his political theory; for it means a “will that must come from all and apply to all” (Social Contract, 15) The General Will became a normative concept which Rousseau used as a means of reconciling individual freedom and collective responsibility. The main line of argument of this study develops on the utopian nature of the concept of the general will in Rousseau’s…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although complicated tasks were divided among workers, the workers become more dependent on one another. The division of labor among individuals allowed them to transform land into property, however an unequal distribution of resources emerged as not all individuals held the same talents and abilities as one another. Therefore, the use of resources were unequal since some individuals could benefit by being naturally gifted at their craft while others could find it difficult to survive in a nonsufficient market depending the needs of that community. The institution of property, according to Rousseau, is what adds to the political and social inequalities. It is important to note that Rousseau does not necessarily believe that property is the cause of these inequalities rather he points to the inequality of property as the main driven force behind…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau was an English Philosopher whose work was influential especially in the eighteenth century. Some of his main works include the Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, and the Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Both of these works were written in response to prompts from the Academy of Dijon. For the first discourse, the prompt was, “Has the restoration of the sciences and arts tended to purify morals?” and for the second discourse the prompt was, "What is the origin of inequality among men, and is it authorized by the natural law?"…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Alexis de Tocqueville and Karl Marx examine the social change that nations go through either as a result of democracy diminishing Aristocratic ages or because of the wide spread of industrial capitalism. However, Marx and Tocqueville observe the impact of these social changes on the community differently. Marx writings are about how the European world was changing during his lifespan. He observes how the beginning of the Industrial Revolution creates an increase in the level of economic production, but also an immense increase of inequality in a society. On the contrary, Tocqueville analyzes the relationship between equality and liberty during the democratic ages vs. the aristocratic ages.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau observes human nature as innately good when it’s extracted from all social attachments and the immensely corrupting overall influence of society itself. Society, for Rousseau in his eyes is a grand impulse where the decencies of human beings are displayed. Rousseau 's political theories are derived from the seemingly simple idea of arranging humans into a social setting that’s bare of corrupting elements of society. Rousseau 's leap toward a social and political order of amour propre over amour de soi is evidence of this. Rousseau derives a substantial amount of his beliefs from morals such as equality.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau proclaimed that the natural man “wandered up and down the forests, without industry, without speech, and without home” (1:25). The natural man was dependent only on himself and provided himself with what he needed. He was…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Depending on the focus, private property can be viewed as natural or unnatural, and this idea is what shapes the effects seen on equality in society. Rousseau, among many philosophers, believes that private property is an unnatural concept that hinders equality in society. Opinions may vary but it may actually be an adhesive building block for society in and of itself because it is found in nature and allows for sufficient resource management. There is much controversy surrounding its impact on equality, but not even in nature is equality present. The real argument to be broached is not what private property does to impact equality, but whether or not equality itself is capable in a functional…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “There is always going to be someone who is bigger and better than you.” This phrase that many children are told is true; however, does it have to control the way society acknowledges each person? As civilizations grew, social hierarchies became more prevalent. Critics like Jean-Jacques Rousseau started to point out how society has created “moral” inequalities which is not natural to man’s state. In Rousseau’s essay, The Discourse of Inequality, he points out how society has caused men to put each other in an unjustifiable category of inequality.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the seventeen hundred, there were different thoughts on what women are expected to do. Such issues are made on the questions of why women were created and what their duties are in society. However, in the twentieth century, there are no longer as any women issues as there was back then. One of the big issues back then was that woman were not to be treated equally to men. This was specifically talked about by two enlightenment thinkers named Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    4. This nation satisfies all of Rousseau’s other preconditions With the preceding conditions, if it is in the General Will of the people that the nation should equally redistribute wealth, thereby eliminating class differences, then, when the citizens vote, the result, and therefore the General Will, would eliminate such inequality. Therefore, the precondition that inequality must be limited would be unnecessary if all other conditions were met, and equality were part of the General…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Comparing Rousseau and Mill on Liberty In this essay, I would like to contrast and compare the concept of liberty in Jean Jacques Rousseau's “the Social Contract Theory”, which was written in 1762 and J.S. Mill's On liberty, which was written in 1859. In a fact, the authors were born different century and also, had different ideas. They were successfully influence the society by sharing their ideas. In the writings, both Rousseau and Mill mainly discourses about the relationship between authority and one's liberty. First, I would like to examine both Rousseau's and Mill's schemas and then compare their thoughts.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays