• Home Page
  • Difference Between Hobbes Locke And Rousseau

Difference Between Hobbes Locke And Rousseau

Superior Essays
Show More
Most people take for granted many things we are afforded in this day and age. One of those things we take for granted is the government. Without said government there would be no laws to provide order and security, and we would be in a state of nature that would result in a state of war. A state of nature, regardless of who is detailing its differences, is basically a life without government rule leaving people to act out of self-preservation. A place without government is a place of chaos with everyone acting of their own accord. The state of nature is viewed differently by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. Hobbes views that state of nature and man in a negative light with everyone being only for themselves. Locke views the state of nature in …show more content…
The purpose of law for Rousseau is to communicate the general will of the people. The general will of the people puts the common interest of all involved at the forefront. Whereas in the state of nature there was a sense of inequality, once the social contract is in effect there is equality as everyone is needed for the common good to take place. In order for these laws to be enacted the majority must agree to give up their individual rights for the protection of all. The sovereign hopes to serve the common good while putting private interest last. For Rousseau laws are “the conditions of civil association”, meaning that the laws are created by the citizens and are to be followed and enforced by the citizens. No law can go into effect unless everyone agrees to …show more content…
In order to leave the state of nature individuals must consent to the social contract in order to form a commonwealth. For a social contract to be enacted all members of society must agree to give up certain rights provided in the state of nature to create a civil society that benefits them all. The commonwealth for all three signifies an impartial power which makes the final decisions concerning matters in civil society. For Hobbes the social contract is created because people live in fear that another will harm them in their quest for self-preservation. While Locke believes that a social contract is needed to create an impartial judge because men cannot be trusted not to take justice too far, once the common good is no longer at the forefront. Rousseau believes that a social contract is needed in order to preserve the community as it is becoming hard for everyone to survive on their resources

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Similarities Between John Locke And Napoleon Bonaparte
    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Similarities Between John Locke And Napoleon Bonaparte

    In Rousseau’s document The Social Contract, he refers to an original “social contract” that terminates the “state of nature” and establishes the “civil state”. For example, in entering the social contract, the individual surrenders his rights to society as a whole, which governs in accordance with the general will: “Each of us puts his person and all his power in common under the supreme direction of the general will…” (Pg. 72). Therefore, in Rousseau's explanation of freedom, there is a division between two types of freedom. They are personal freedom and social freedom.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Rousseau Analysis
    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hobbes Vs Rousseau Analysis

    Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau strongly differ on their view of the purpose of the state. Hobbes sees the state as a positive institution that creates order and sows peace. Rousseau sees the state as an institution of chains, that renders it’s citizens salves to the will of the majority. Before reaching these conclusions they argue on the base nature of man. Hobbes argues that self preservation is the base of human nature whereas Rousseau argues it is property.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke And Jean-Jacques Rousseau
    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Locke And Jean-Jacques Rousseau

    Locke and Rousseau’s unequal views of state of nature resulted in their different ideas of…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Compare And Contrast John Locke And Jean Jacque Rousseau
    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast John Locke And Jean Jacque Rousseau

    Although both philosophers believe in a State of Nature, they do not necessarily believe in the same concepts within the theory. In Locke’s…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Rousseau On Human Nature
    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hobbes Vs Rousseau On Human Nature

    The description of the state of nature is only a prelude to political theories concerning the ideal political system for humans to live in. On one hand, Rousseau depicted natural man as solitary and peaceful as he illustrated how man is tainted as he becomes societal via the process of moving into society. To him, society is the corrupting force that transforms ‘natural man’ into the self-obsessed beast that Hobbes declares he is. He does not deny Hobbes’ concept of state of nature but declares it incorrect and gives it his own significant meaning. For Rousseau, reverting back to the state of nature is much more than the removal of government or authority.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau And Mill's Views On Freedom
    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Rousseau And Mill's Views On Freedom

    In Rousseau’s argument, men cannot be as free as they are in the state of nature in modern society and asserts that that institutions and structures in modern society contradict the freedom and natural goodness of man. Yet, a specific government may be able to provide its members with a certain amount of freedom that somewhat amounts to that present in the state of nature. He writes, in regards to the role of government, “Find a form of association which defends and protects with all common forces the person and goods of each associate, and by means of which each one, while uniting with all, nevertheless obeys only himself and remains as free as before” (Rousseau, 148). The ultimate goal of the government is to ensure the natural freedom of its societal members. The law put forth from the government should be a reflection of the general will of the community.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke And Jean-Jacque Rousseau
    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis Of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke And Jean-Jacque Rousseau

    People in the State of Nature have some rights, such as punishing transgressors, and keeping the items they cultivate (219). People can coexist morally in the State of Nature and there does not exist the prominence of competition, as Hobbes described, due to the morality of the individuals. People in Locke 's State of Nature can recognize moral limitations, and react to them, but the main problem is the lack in the concentration of the power. There does not exists some entity that can protect the rights of individuals, therefore they enter a society, under a desired common judge by giving up their defense rights to the common judge who, in turn, will protect these rights for the individuals…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau Origin Of Civil Society Essay
    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Rousseau Origin Of Civil Society Essay

    Rousseau stood firm in his belief of what the right form of government would look like or at least appear to be, but also argues that people are surrendering rights and freedom to themselves while establishing a civil society. In the reading A World of Ideas; Jean-Jacques Rousseau “The Origin of Civil Society” by Lee Jacobus, they briefly describe what kind of arguments and challenges he had faced from opposing famous philosophers ' beliefs. Some of which including those who played a role in aiding the development of the type of government seen in America today. In the book Jacobus…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Leviathan And Jean-Jacques Rousseau's The Social Contract And The Discourses
    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Leviathan And Jean-Jacques Rousseau's The Social Contract And The Discourses

    The sovereign’s absolute authority on matters that concern the public leads into question how it is truly possible for to determine what is for the public good. Just like anyone who has their own views, the sovereign is going to naturally pursue his own beliefs and ambitions. Rousseau’s social contract is by no means a democracy; it is a strong monarchy. A Monarch utilizes the government to implement his absolute authority over the public domain. A government that is comprised of a great many people with their own views is going to naturally often be at odds with the monarch.…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Comparing State Of Nature By Thomas Hobbes And Jean-Jacques Rousseau
    • 1018 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparing State Of Nature By Thomas Hobbes And Jean-Jacques Rousseau

    Over the course of history there exists a strong desire to move to a more organized state; one to bring people together under a unified power to ensure protection from the State of Nature. Political theorists, such as Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, introduce political contracts to help mankind escape from the State of Nature and bring them into a civil society. While both Hobbes and Locke claim to protect the individual from domination, when man no longer has control over their natural rights under a political authority, within their idealized societies, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, suggests moving out of the State of Nature provides the opposite effect and creates harm to mankind. Political contracts, do not secure and protect man from domination, but instead enhances dominance in civil society by granting men justification…

    • 1018 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    What Is The Difference Between John Locke And Rousseau
    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What Is The Difference Between John Locke And Rousseau

    All forms of social contract theory ultimately come down to one idea, that being that the individual desire for security and safety, demands fulfillment through a collective agreement. This collective agreement transforms the unaltered human state from the natural, primal state into an organized society. Beginning with Thomas Hobbes, with perhaps the most pessimistic view on the social contract and why it came about. According to Hobbes prior to Social Contract, man lived in the State of Nature. Man’s life in the State of nature was one of fear and selfishness, a chaotic condition of constant fear.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    What Is The Difference Between Hobbes And Rousseau
    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What Is The Difference Between Hobbes And Rousseau

    Hobbes and Rousseau differ in their ideas on the state of nature, Hobbes has a negative view, while Rousseau believes we were better off in the state of nature. The basis for their different ideas on the state of nature contribute to their diverging ideas on their accounts of government by social contract. Hobbes argues for citizens relinquishing their authority to the state, while Rousseau contends for the sovereign authority to be in the hand of the citizens. I will argue that Rousseau makes a more convincing argument because it is one of compromise rather than extremism. Hobbes’ account of government by social contract is based on the basic principle and rational that people give up some of their rights in order to feel secure.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Compare And Contrast Hobbes Locke And Rousseau
    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Hobbes Locke And Rousseau

    Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14). Those who debate this subject often mistake right and law to be the same yet they ought to be distinguished.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Human Existence In Aristotle's Society
    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Human Existence In Aristotle's Society

    How is human existence improved or degraded after the passage of nature to society? Aristotle feels that not only is human existence greatly improved by society but society is absolutely necessary for him to truly and fully experience his existence. Aristotle claims that humanity is only self-sufficient in a society. " The complete community...is the city.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Social Contract Theory Vs Natural Law
    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Social Contract Theory Vs Natural Law

    Again, this seems to be a critique of the law of nature, where the strongest are the ones fit to survive, which would follow Natural Law, but not the rules of the Social Contract. Obeying because one is forced to due to the “might” of a ruler is not the same as one obeying because of their moral obligation. Furthermore, he rejects the notion of “might makes right” for the reasoning that God chose the “mighty” to rule and therefore the ruler should be obeyed, as God is the source of the Natural Law, and that goes against the notions of the Social Contract. Natural Law is a point of contention for Rousseau, as he seems to change his opinion of believing it or not depending on which idea will better support his argument. However, he does establish that there was definitely something present for us in our state of nature that we found an equal in with the Social…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings