He goes on to talk a little bit about the the rights of Americans and what he dislikes when he talks about gun control. He explains that in his opinion there is only one real argument on the opposing side and that is,“Fuck off. I like guns.” (Jefferies, Jim) He elaborates on how the pro gun arguments have no real common sense behind what they say is the reason that they have guns.…
Roth concluded that “Several strategies may succeed in reducing gun murders, but rigorous evaluations are needed to ascertain their effectiveness. Among these are reducing firearm lethality (e.g., by banning certain types of ammunition), reducing unauthorized use (e.g., through combination locks on triggers, or sentence enhancements for burglary and fencing violations that involve guns), and educating the public about safe use and storage” (Roth, 2007). He concludes that not gun banning, but reform related to education and pursuing the criminality of illegal arms trade will curb gun violence in the United States. His overall conclusion from his findings is: “Where there is local support, priority should be given to three enforcement objectives: disrupting illegal gun markets; reducing juveniles ' access to guns; and close cooperation between the police and the community to set priorities and enforce laws” (Roth, 2007). Only by working together can the government and its citizens in the U.S. aim to curve violent crime.…
Davidson begins his article with the recent events of a mass shooting to hook in his audience. Then he goes on to lay out some interesting statistics regarding the annual number of shootings and how much of the American population is in favor of gun control. After this, he moves onto an interview of the director of Center for Research in Crime and Justice at New York University School, James Jacobs of Law who is also a professor of constitutional law where he brings up most of the main arguments for gun control and explains why these concepts would not work. They begin with some common misconceptions about things such as the “remarkable decrease in violent crime and gun crime in the U.S. since the early 1990s”, and that “most gun-related deaths…
He also defends his opinion saying the only thing stricter gun laws will do is prevent law abiding citizens from being able to purchase guns. In his essay, James Q. Wilson…
She goes on to say that regardless of the gun type or owner that they should be removed, banned, and revolked from their owners to the greatest extent possible. No person, unconditional to how responsible or knowledge about…
He talks about the arguments and the arguments in favor of gun control. How there’s already restriction to whom can buy guns like people with criminal records or mental illness, drug addicts, immigrants without legal status. Why people are against because many use guns for hunting, self-defense, etc….Also how in the second amendment is bear arms. Pena also discloses how an armed citizen can stop a mass shooter.…
Society has been split into two over whether or not guns should be banned, but there needs to be a solution where both parties can be happy. Anti-gun advocates present reasoning why guns should be banned. McMahan’s main two arguments of why guns should be banned: one, guns in the community creates a more dangerous environment; and two, the police have less of a power to protect citizens when society has guns (Shafer-Landau, The Ethical Life (EL) 390). McMahan explains that communities are not going to be free of crimes with more people carrying around guns, because criminals will be more prepared, efficient, and quicker to grab and shoot their target (Shafer-Landau, EL 392-392). People with guns will be safer than people without guns, because they do not have a gun to protect themselves.…
Gun Control does not prevent Gun Violence Gun control is a very controversial topic especially in today's society; whether gun control is good or bad is a very talked about subject especially when it comes to the United States. This is a very touchy subject because guns are a part of a lot of people's daily lives. People that are anti gun control believe that no one should be able to put any restrictions on guns. They believe that people should be able to buy a firearm just like a pair of boots or a tool. They also believe that if you take firearms away from the law abiding citizens that just leaves firearms in the hands of people that don't abide by the law and leaves them defenseless.…
Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…
He mentioned several cases in which people who were mentally unstable had guns and used them to harm other people. It is important to take into consideration all of the cases around the nation in which a man or woman shot and killed innocent people. Gun control does not decrease the murder rate, neither does it strip criminals of their firearms. It does not seem fair that the government will enforce gun control laws, but will not disarm criminals. In simple words, gun control will not solve the problem that is known as gun violence.…
An incendiary debate has been sparked regarding current gun control legislation in the United States, because approximately 30,000 United States citizens lose their lives to gun-related crime and injury every year (Terror). The question is whether gun control laws should be strengthened to make it harder for potential criminals to possess weapons or kept the same to preserve the rights of the United States citizens. Gun control opponents believe that the answer to this problem is to loosen gun control laws to dissuade potential shooters. Gun control proponents believe that the answer is to tighten gun control laws so that a gun is never put into a potential shooter’s hands. To examine this issue, one must carefully ponder different points of…
In the past few decades, firearms have had a big impact on society. These impacts have been both good and evil, and have caused controversy on the topic of gun ownership. Some groups, such as the Brady Campaign, would like to see gun control laws take away some rights and restrict others, whereas the National Rifle Association would like to protect gun rights and educate society on the use of firearms. Both sides want to stop the problem of gun violence, but protecting gun rights is the only way to truly insure public safety. Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves.…
In our modern society, guns are entwined with escalating arguments about gun control and gun violence. Generally speaking, the quarrel scorches across the American terrain like a raging fire; practically every day there is a news story related to a firing arm. To demonstrate, a recent Central News Network article debriefs gun presence in relation to violence and other tragedies. In this case, guns association with homicides, terrorism and mass shootings. In compliance with statistics, there are more gun owners in the United States than anywhere else in the globe.…
He states their assumption as that which includes: that everyone’s overall safety will increase as more individuals own gums because it provides the people with a successful means of defense for themselves and others around them because the increase in the possibility of attacking armed victims decreases criminals’ disposition to attack. This, he says, does not provide logical evidence of a need for an increase in private gun ownership. The increase in the availability of private guns will only make the criminals who are already willing to attack more likely to be armed, and more likely to fire their weapons. The gun advocates, he advises, wrongly believe that a solution to this problem is to have more private citizens armed; however, as the perceived amount of safety increases so does the number of guns readily…
62% of the 31,000 deaths caused by a gun are suicides (Cornell 2). According to Arthur L. Kellerman, MD, “residents of homes where a gun is present are 5 times more likely to experience a suicide than residents of homes without guns” (A Case for Gun Control). I have experienced the effects of suicide within my own family. One month ago, my cousin Marisa committed suicide. She was 26 years old and had been diagnosed with schizophrenia a few years prior to the tragic incident.…