Commentary And Summary: The Australian Comedian Jim Jeffries

Improved Essays
The Australian comedian Jim Jefferies breaks down the absurdity of America’s obsession with guns in his Netflix special “BARE” done in 2014. He confidently shares his opinion in a way that seems funny to many people.
Jim Jefferies in this comedy bit shares his opinion of gun control maturely as to help the audience members or people watching at home not get enraged as much. He starts off by stating, “I believe in your right as Americans to have guns.” (Jefferies, Jim) He firstly tries to help the audience and people watching at home to understand that he truly does believe in the 2nd amendment to bare arms. He then states that, “I’m not trying to stop you from having guns. All I’m saying is this is my personal belief on the opinion.” (Jefferies,
…show more content…
He goes on to state about how the correlation between the two countries and how they have reacted to suggestions to try and resolve the matter of solving the issue of mass shootings. His remarks how Australia has not had a mass shooting since 1996 due to the new laws in place. He then shares a bit about how the shootings could have been stopped if the same laws were implemented in America. He also comically states how the United States responded to the mass shooting of Sandy Hook and the response of the American people. He goes on to talk a little bit about the the rights of Americans and what he dislikes when he talks about gun control. He explains that in his opinion there is only one real argument on the opposing side and that is,“Fuck off. I like guns.” (Jefferies, Jim) He elaborates on how the pro gun arguments have no real common sense behind what they say is the reason that they have guns. He shows the fault in the arguments he has heard and in a comedic …show more content…
I’ve done nothing wrong.” (Jefferies, Jim) In response to this to states arguments that seem logical to him and how society in his opinion has to abide by laws made because of the people who don’t seem to think rationally. Another argument he has heard is that if we take away all guns then only the criminals have guns. He then states about how in Australia the price of guns on the black market are very expensive. He draws a comparison to how much the gun used in the Sandy Hook Massacre cost to what it would have been if all guns were illegal and how the possibility of a kid being able to get a gun from the black market would be slim. To finish off he talks about the real reason the 2nd amendment was created to which it was ,”so that you could form a militia to fight against a tyrannical government.”(Jefferies, Jim) He goes on to state how we live in different times and how the real reason for the amendment has no real truth to it anymore. This is an overall funny bit done on gun control. In this performance by Jim Jefferies he states a lot of convincing evidence to the argument that all guns should be illegal and that the arguments of people that are pro gun have no foundation. There is quite a bit of profanity so do be aware before watching this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    JOINING THE FRAY: GARRET KEIZER’S LOADED LIBERAL WAKE UP CALL Published in Harper’s Magazine, Garret Keizer’s “Loaded” uses race as a way of demanding that, as citizens of the United States, we wake up from our progressive indifference. The brilliant author flips his intended audience’s liberal beliefs and uses it against them to successfully prove his point. The majority of Keizer’s essay is seemingly about the gun debate. The lefty audience is likely to have strong anti-gun opinion, whereas Keizer subtly shares that he is pro-gun and owns a shotgun.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes individuals should have the right to purchase and own a gun, but also believes there should be policies and restrictions along with the right. Lindgren then goes on to explain the history of gun control and how our current policies were developed. Because Lindgrens stance falls in the middle of the two sides of the argument, throughout the article he acknowledges the ups and downs of both sides. Lindgren shares, “I would not be surprised if reducing gun-free zones increased homicides and suicides overall, while it reduced the number of lives lost in mass murders.” (716) This is one of many instances where Lindgren shows how torn his opinion is on gun control.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Interpreting the Second Amendment In the Bill of Rights, the citizens are given the privilege to own firearms for their personal protection. However, the Second Amendment seemed to take away this right by adding the concept of “organized militia.” In Columbia v. Heller, the court held that individuals could possess firearms without having to be the members of a militia. However, judge Stevens gave a dissent stating that all judgments should be made with the direction of past cases and court decisions. His main argument came from the fact that gun control laws had not been made unconstitutional.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “There is more hooey spread about the Second Amendment. It says quite clearly that guns are for those who form part of a well-regulated militia.” By doing this she adds reasoning…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Detrimental Truth: Trevor Noah Examines the Good and Bad Following Congress’ Gun Control Filibuster by Jason Nawara In following Congress Gun Control Filibuster, Nawara states "the first two bills that set to be voted on are as follows: people on terrorist watch lists are now stopped from buying a gun. Republicans want these people to have 72 hours so the FBI can find probable cause to deny their weapon purchase. The second bill closes a loophole in which gun purchases online or at gun shows circumvent background checks. The background check bill, in a similar but different from failed to pass after the Sandy Hook massacre.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this New York Times article Erik Eckholm uses mass shootings such as the Columbine, Virginia tech and Sandy Hook shootings to demonstrate the need for stricter gun laws. The writing of this article was sparked by the most recent shooting in Roseburg, Oregon. By using these tragedies along with very supportive statistics he is able to persuade the reader to believe that the current laws and restrictions simply are not enough. 90 people a day are killed by guns, two thirds of that statistic are suicides. This goes to show that Eckholm understands that sometimes “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.”…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mass Shooting Summary

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is chilling. The incidence of mass shootings in America has risen dramatically. Since 1949, there have been 32 single-day mass shootings and of those, 18 have occurred since 2000. The number of people slain is even more suggestive of this seeming epidemic: 307 of 480 people who were killed in all of the attacks, perished since 2000 (“Deadliest”). Murphy offers just one solution, that of gun control, without so much as a mention of any underlying issues that are manifesting in these attacks.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Research Paper

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An incendiary debate has been sparked regarding current gun control legislation in the United States, because approximately 30,000 United States citizens lose their lives to gun-related crime and injury every year (Terror). The question is whether gun control laws should be strengthened to make it harder for potential criminals to possess weapons or kept the same to preserve the rights of the United States citizens. Gun control opponents believe that the answer to this problem is to loosen gun control laws to dissuade potential shooters. Gun control proponents believe that the answer is to tighten gun control laws so that a gun is never put into a potential shooter’s hands. To examine this issue, one must carefully ponder different points of…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our modern society, guns are entwined with escalating arguments about gun control and gun violence. Generally speaking, the quarrel scorches across the American terrain like a raging fire; practically every day there is a news story related to a firing arm. To demonstrate, a recent Central News Network article debriefs gun presence in relation to violence and other tragedies. In this case, guns association with homicides, terrorism and mass shootings. In compliance with statistics, there are more gun owners in the United States than anywhere else in the globe.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rodger D. McGrath is a well-known supporter of the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, the right to keep and bear arms. He wrote the article “A God-Given Natural Right.” McGrath’s article covers former disarmament, rise in crime, and history of the Second Amendment. His article has convincing reasoning for his intended audience. His targeted patrons are those who fiercely support the right to bear arms, proudly own multiple guns, believe gun restrictions mean complete disarmament, and those whom fear total government takeover.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Confessions of a Liberal Gun Owner”, author James Cronin explains why he, despite being a liberal, believes in and exercises his gun ownership rights. This essay, in particular, is quite intriguing due to the fact a liberal is supporting the second amendment. The title alone draws in a diverse crowd because it is somewhat paradoxical in today's divided political spectrum. The personal crisis that leads to the author’s support of gun ownership enlightens and resonates with nearly all readers. In “Confessions of a Liberal Gun Owner”, Cronin successfully presents a persuasive argument for firearms that is convincing to both liberals and conservatives alike.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Columnist Nicholas Kristof wrote an article titled “Our Blind Spot about Guns,” which was published in The New York Times in 2014. In the article’s context, he “argues that if guns and their owners were regulated in the same way that cars and their drivers are, thousands of lives could be saved each year” (Kristof 161). He incorporates multiple statistics in his essay, provides us with insights from the opposing side, and compares the issue of gun control to one that occurred a century ago: vehicle control. Just in the first two paragraphs, Kristof does not cease to use startling statistics that he is sure will grab our attention. He brings to light the issue of 1921 when vehicle regulations were non-existent which, therefore, contributed to the issue of high fatality rates.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative “You can have all the gun control laws in the country, but if you don’t enforce them, people are gonna find a way to protect themselves. We need to recognize that bad people are doing bad things with these weapons. It’s not the law-abiding citizens, it’s not the person who uses it as a hobby” (Steele). There are around 100,000 victims of gun violence each year (“Brady Campaign...”). Action needs to be taken so Americans don’t feel unprotected going into a public environment.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent years, a lot of debate had been going on about the laws pertaining to firearms. Unfortunately, with all of the mass shootings and killings being reported by the media, guns are given a bad reputation. Sadly, many people believe that they should be illegal because they are dangerous and can kill people, but what these people don’t realize is making them illegal will do a lot more harm than good. Guns have created a balance in society and if we were to take them away it could cause a lot of chaos which would result in more crime and more casualties. People deserve the right to bear arms because with proper training one could possibly save his/her life and also protect others.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays