Can A Consequentialist Theory Account For The Moral Psychology Of Agents

Can a Consequentialist theory account for the moral psychology of agents characterised by Pettit as non-atomism, non-moralism and non-actuarialist? Do you agree that these features do represent the moral psychology of agents? (Your essay should be based on either or both of Pettit’s or Parfit’s accounts).
To start off my essay I will begin by explaining the three claims for the moral psychology in details, I will be commenting on Phillip Pettit’s response to the non- consequentialist approach to moral psychology of agents, I will be doing this by giving the account of what they believe, Pettit’s view upon the non- consequentialist view, alongside that I will give short explanations for each point about whether the consequentialist theory can