Moral Realism And Moral Relativism Essay

Decent Essays
The topic I have selected to write about is what is the difference between moral realism and moral relativism? I chose this one because they both have some resemblance but they also have their dissimilarities. This topic is truly remarkable since everybody has their opinion on the topic. Moral relativism is the view that moral judgments can be true or false. Moral Realism is based-upon ethical facts and honorable values, these objective are self-determining from our perception from them and also our beliefs, feelings and other outlooks toward them are involved.
Moral realism is “such things exist as ethical facts and also honorable values, and that these are objective and independent of our perception of them or our beliefs, feelings or other attitudes included towards them.” What I inferred from moral relativism is that you have to find the truth in certain sentence to understand the actual meaning. For example if someone says that murder is a crime or wrong, immoral and disgraceful you would first have to decide the truth of the sentence. The truthful segment from the sentence can be taken and evaluated. For example, moral realism may implement what amount the cost or benefit analysis to determine if murder is wrong. Some of the
…show more content…
A moral acceptance is untrue or unfair or differing in the similar way we would about a realistic trust. Disparate more or less further meta-ethical systems says that they can not mutually be correct and so there had better be approximately way of making your mind up about the situation. The situation also allows for the purpose of honorable differences. These differences come roughly about if two ethical politics challenge one another. The incline of opposed regions includes ethical language, moral truth, decent knowledge, honorable objectivity, principled psychology, and so taking

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In William Shaw’s essay about Relativism in Ethics he analyzes the matter of what is ethically wrong and right and how relative it is to an individual or to one’s own culture. He defends to argue that ethical relativism of either side is unjustified. Shaw examines that some relativist may think that morality is relative to only the individual and not one’s own culture. This theory considers that what is right and what is wrong is determined by what an individual may think is right or wrong. However, if any individual was to decide what is right and what is wrong how would one know what really is right and wrong.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I believe that it is common sense to disagree with moral relativism solely on the fact that it accepts racism, genocide of groups, even murder, as justifiable as long as that is what the group values to be right or acceptable. Having the beliefs of a moral relativist, you could go so far as to say that a group or culture could decide that starting a nuclear war was morally just, and that we as people outside of that group could not criticize those people for their actions. If ethical relativism is to be completely true, there can be no common ground for resolving moral disputes or for reaching an agreement on moral matters between members of different cultures. When it comes to justifying moral relativism, there is no decision procedure that can demonstrate the objective truth or falsity of moral judgments. On the contrary, moral objectivism, also known as moral absolutism, encompasses ethical theories that support the objectivity of moral values and norms.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sacrifice In Aztec Culture

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Similarly, ethical relativism is the theory that there are no universally valid moral principles, but that all moral principles are valid to culture or individual choice. (Vice and Virtue) On one hand the Diversity thesis believes that morality differ from society to society, and there is no universal moral principles. On the other hand, the Dependency thesis states that all moral principles derive their validity from cultural acceptance. (Vice and Virtue)…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world of Pojman On behalf of Pojman and his interpretation of universal moral principles “The individual realizes his personality through his culture, hence respect for individual differences entails a respect for cultural differences” The executive board of the American Anthropological Association (69) The executive board of the American Anthropological Association proposal was meant to acknowledge moral diversity in different cultures around the world. This fragment was part of an introductory reading to the essay, “ The Case Against Ethical Relativism” by Louis Pojman. In this essay, he elaborates different arguments against ethical relativism, explains his own interpretation of universal moral principles and reconciles cultural…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1a. Cultural relativism is the view that no culture is superior to any other culture when comparing systems of morality, law, politics, etc. (AllAboutPhilosophy.org, n.d.) It does not offer a universal right and wrong, but rather offers the notion of morals based on the cultural environment. This diverges from the traditional ethical theories of doing what is right and adopts the ethical theories that are the “lay of the land” as they relate to the local culture in which the dilemma takes place.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It took me breaking these ideas down to the most basic sentence. I used the sentence that heroes are good and villains are bad. To me, the moral realism way of thinking is that these are true statements. We all have seen tons of movies to prove that this idea is factual, which is why I agree with a moral realism view. However, a moral relativism looks at this sentence as just an opinion of the two characters.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism is the view that “some moral rules really are correct, and that these determine which moral claims are true and which false.”…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism And Culture

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Each society has their own code, therefore “there is no objective standard that can be used to judge one society’s code better than another” (161). When it comes to moral codes in a society, these codes do not take president outside of their specific society. Ethics is usually defined as the “branch of philosophy that deals with how we ought to live with the idea of the good, and with concepts such as “right” and “wrong” (1). Within ethics there is said to be no “universal truth”, because each society moral codes varies. Individuals should not judge others moral codes because they are different.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If Metaethics never existed there would be no deeper meaning to morality itself. Metaethics is a branch of philosophy that analyzes moral values and focuses on the question “what is morality itself is?” (Pacillo-Dellino). Metaethics which is also referred to as “Second Order” has four basic stanzas that are called Four Basic Stanzas of Metaethics. The four basic stanzas of Metaethics are Absolutism, Objectivism, Cultural and Subjective Relativism, and Emotivism.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the first major problem that moral relativism poses for ethics would be that people could abuse it and use it as an excuse for some of the decisions that they make. Perhaps, they are doing something that is seen as immortal to majority of cultures, but they claim that it is moral because they have seen in other cultures that it is morally accepted because it fits the beliefs and or customs that a certain may have. Another issue that may pose a problem for ethics would be that moral relativism leads to absurd conclusion, and changes our ability to deliberate straight and make certain opinions about moral or ethical issues. If there is absolutely no moral law than there is no foundation for…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This theory claims that ethics depends on the culture and the people within that culture. For example, in India, it was ethical to burn the widows with their deceased husbands. This was seen as unethical by the British Empire as they told the Indians that they will shoot them if they do not stop. However, this means that the British Empire thinks it is ethical to shoot people in order to stop them from doing an unethical tradition. This brings up how diverse ethics is throughout the world as each culture has their own ethics.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy paper on relativism and weather I agree or disagree In the following paper I will be discussing relativism, more specifically cultural and ethical relativism and weather I agree or disagree with that philosophy. Cultural revisits state that “no particular moral or ethical position can actually be considered “right” or “wrong.” Ethical relativism states that …”whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced”. I agree with ethical and cultural relativism because there is no right or wrong moral code because people and societies have different beliefs.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Judgement Essay

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral judgement is a process which defines what is wrong, right, ethical, unethical, moral, or immoral. Moral judgement can also be defined as an expression of preference, opinion, will and command of individuals (383). Tom Regan and Mary Midgley both discuss the importance of moral theory and their different ways one can or can’t answer moral questions. Tom Regan focuses on the relativism point of view by expressing four different ways on how not to answer moral questions. Moral relativism depends on culture, legality, religion, and historical symbolism.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moral relativists such as David Wong and Gilbert Harman have provided a more sophisticated version of moral relativism which mitigated some flaws of the inaugural and naïve form which Rachel argued against. Cultural relativism is also a relevant theory to explain the extreme cases of disagreements in our world. However, there is still invalidity and shortcomings of the cultural relativism argument that hinders moral progress, or deteriorate the view about morality into nihilistic grounds. Hence it is still essential to maintain some moral truths as objective instead of accepting the theory in…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays