Appeasement And Pacifism In The 1930's

Improved Essays
When attempting to understand why appeasement was used as a measure to stop war, considering the the ideology of Chamberlain is crucial in terms of understanding the perspective in which he viewed war. Throughout the 1930’s, pacifism had flourished in Britain as almost two and a half million British soldiers had been killed or wounded in the first world war. This act of war, although it happened some 20 years prior, had still been fresh in the minds of the British people. Neville Chamberlain would carry the torch of pacifism ever since he was elected Prime Minister of Britain in 1937. Chamberlain’s pacifist attitude towards war in general was a culmination of living through the war himself and of having a cousin, whom Chamberlain cared for …show more content…
This all ended when Hitler felt that it was safe to withdraw from all agreements with the allied powers and to exercise very calculated acts of war. Hitler made this decision on a very thought out principle, that the other European nations would become angry, but wouldn 't go to war in order to preserve the terms of the Treaty of Versailles. He was right, in a major act of appeasement Britain, France, Italy, and the League of Nations condemned Germany 's rearmament, but did nothing in terms of addressing the issue. This tepid reaction only emboldened Hitler as he believed that he could continue to test the waters. A year later, he violated another provision of the Treaty of Versailles and remilitarized the Rhineland. This ultimately lead to the invasion of Poland and the failures of appeasement when dealing with Hitler became more evident than ever before. Aggressive, expansionist states are most easily stopped early on when they are weak and vulnerable. But precisely because their capabilities are limited at that point—and their intentions can only be guessed at, it is often hard to persuade other countries to act. The governments at this time believed that it would be more intelligent to accommodate rather than confront the actions of Hitler. This idea of accommodation did not sit well with one individual in particular, Winston Churchill. Churchill was an elected Tory with more than 20 years of cabinet experience in the British House of Commons. Due to his beliefs, Churchill is put aside by his peers as his ideals are seen as outdated. When churchill speaks out about defending Britain against the rising Nazi power, few would listen as he was viewed as a warmonger. For Winston Churchill, Hitler was a tyrant who was not to be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Essay Question: Was Hitler’s totalitarian rule one of great achievement or one of great depression and force. Ever since the treaty of Versailles on the 28 June 1919, Germany was left in a state of humiliation and despair with its society wanting of a dictator to bring them back to their former Glory. Adolf Hitler was the answer they were looking for and with Germany’s government struggling along with the great depression the people were eager for anything.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He was very determined when it came to never giving up and that is why people admired him so much. No matter what Hitler or the people of Germany did to them, the British weren't going to give up without a strong fight. Churchill was the kind of person, much like many other leaders, that was not going to stop fighting for what he wanted until he finally got it. He wasn't going to let Hitler tell them what they were going to do and what they weren't going to do. He wasn't going to let them dictate what the people of Great Britain do like Hitler did to every other nation he defeated.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Walter Wink’s article “Beyond Just War and Pacifism” he does not believe war should ever be justified. He gave a helpful understanding for the complexity and opacity of human violence. In a broader view Wink sees a hidden dimension not apart from physical reality and human society but grounded within the social world. Wink calls this hidden reality “The domain of the Powers”. Wink argues that war can never be just because justice requires fairness on both sides and war there could never be that.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a member of Parliament, he warned the British of the threat posed by Nazi Germany (p. 582). Churchill did not support union trades. He was a supporter of capitalism and wanted social reform. Churchill was also a liberal. While there are many differences between these two men, there are also some similarities.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1939, many people were faced with conflict due to a second World War. Nazis captured Jews, Americans rounded up Japanese, many people responded to this sudden conflict in a negative way, but some responded in a positive way. Having a positive attitude is the best response to conflict, especially in the time of war. A couple of books represent how two people named Anne Frank and Winston Churchill respond to conflict when it comes their way. One of these is Anne Frank:…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Germany lost the war in 1918, the French and the British sought to momentously punish the Germans in a way that they will no longer have the authority to fight again. Hence, in 1919, the Germans were forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles, in which officially ended the state of war between Germany and the opposing allied powers. As a result of the treaty, Germany had to give its land to the French, minimize their army, and most importantly, also pay the reparations for the total cost of the…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Early after WWII began, he made a speech to the House of Commons which was made public that allowed Great Britain to brace itself for the hard times to come. He was vital for his country because as Andrew Roberts says, “ An awful lot of people thought it was impossible to beat the Nazis but he managed to tell the British people that this could happen” (Vitale, 6). The importance that Churchill made to the beliefs of Britons grew by the day. Throughout the threat of the invasion of Britain, Churchill became a great advocate and many started to believe in his words. Being one of very few that warned of the rise of Hitler and still being persistent when no one listened, his reputation began to change.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To many British people, this dedication and motivation of Churchill’s meant that he was a good man, as he only wanted success for his country. However, it was this same motivation that led to the unnecessary and even unjustifiable deaths of millions of people. His motives might have been for the good of his people, but some of his actions and the fact that the benefit towards the Europeans would mean that other people that were not as favourable to him personally would have to suffer and bear the consequences of his decisions made his actions as a whole morally…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles was a peace treaty that stopped the war.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Vindicated Victims of the Treaty of Versailles: Analyzing Hitler’s September 1, 1939 Address Adolf Hitler entered the Kroll Opera House on September 1, 1939, as his troops prepared to invade Poland. Hitler’s speech is an example of the Nazi propaganda that would be commonplace during the war. Propaganda was a major facet of Nazi Germany’s success and this speech reiterates the plight of Germany, Hitler’s beliefs on who was to blame for their failing economy, and what must be done about the crisis. This address was known as a Reichstag Extraordinary Session, a council meeting called upon by the President of the Reich or a majority of the council members. Like many of Hitler’s speeches, nations all over the world had tuned in via radio…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Winston Churchill was the 'clutch man' of WWII; I believe he is the reason for the victory with the Allies over the Nazis. He showed integrity to allow Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union, to join their cause. His humble upbringing helps because he was a great speaker, a great politician, and had a heart of valor. His Life Story is the reason he is a hero. This is why we think of him so highly today.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is well known that Adolf Hitler is a master of persuasion and in his Reichstag speech of December 11, 1941, he shows why. In this speech he gives reasons for the outbreak of war in September 1939, explains why he decided to attack the Soviet Union in June 1941, and announces that Germany was now in a war against the United States. Throughout this speech, he was able to maintain an air of righteousness while successfully manipulating his people into fighting for him. To accomplish this task, he cunningly uses a persuasive format for organizing his points, tone, and rhetoric devices, such as pathos, false dilemmas, and ethos, to gain support and loyalty of the German nation and maintain it.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Unhappy Compromise World War I was officially brought to an end with the signing of the Treaty of Versailles on June 28, 1919. The Treaty of Versailles was negotiated among the Allied powers of Britain, France, and America with little to no participation from Germany. The intent of the treaty was two fold, first to prevent another world war, and second to punish Germany for starting the war to begin with. This vindictive approach would spill over into every part of the treaty and would ultimately lead to its failure. The Treaty of Versailles was unsuccessful, because the German people saw it as a betrayal, Germany was isolated politically form the rest of the world, Germany was forced to give up vast amounts of land, Germany’s proud…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The world wars of the 20th Century were without a doubt, the most bloody and disastrous events to ever occur throughout our history. Described as“far more violent in relative as well as absolute terms than any previous era”1, these two major events shaped the modern day and overshadowed any major conflict that occurred beforehand. Events such as The American Civil War, The French Revolutionary Wars and the Napoleonic Wars all took place an entire century prior to these conflicts, yet none of them amount to the sheer scale and loss of life that both world wars accumulated. This essay will demonstrate the catastrophic nature of violence in both World War 1 and World War 2 in comparison to other major conflicts throughout history. The sheer scale of violence will be explored and factors such as war crimes,…

    • 2239 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Churchill also had other reputations besides politics. He received numerous awards and ranks for his contributions to other subjects he was interested in. The people’s opinion of Churchill is what made him such a well-known and highly regarded man. He made decisions that were thought…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays