There were many great and many terrible leaders in history during World War II. Some of these men were the most evil men in history. Some of the other leaders though, were brave and determined to win the war for a good cause.Many believe the two greatest demonstrations of leadership during World War II were Winston Churchill and Adolf Hitler, both great men in their own right, rising from the ashes of broken peoples to gain influence and control in an otherwise chaotic and turbulent time. There are many similarities and differences between these men, including their political ideologies, goals for the war, and how they treated their citizens.
German dictator Adolf Hitler is known mostly for being one of the most evil men in history. …show more content…
As a member of Parliament, he warned the British of the threat posed by Nazi Germany (p. 582). Churchill did not support union trades. He was a supporter of capitalism and wanted social reform. Churchill was also a liberal.
While there are many differences between these two men, there are also some similarities. Hitler and Churchill both were anti-socialists and hated communism. By not altering their message to suit their audience, but by carrying on insisting that they were right, they both garnered huge support when events finally seemed to confirm their view of the political situation. Both men also fought in WW1. They both also had excellent war tactics.
In conclusion, Winston Churchill and Adolf Hitler were two dissimilar war leaders with little in common. One of these leaders was an example of something that should not be repeated in history. The other was a great man trying to win the war for the better. The things that set them apart are what made them the leaders that they were. The things they had in common also set them apart and greatly affected their alliances and war tactics. Their political ideologies, treatment of their citizens, and goals for the war are the similarities and differences between these
German dictator Adolf Hitler is known mostly for being one of the most evil men in history. …show more content…
As a member of Parliament, he warned the British of the threat posed by Nazi Germany (p. 582). Churchill did not support union trades. He was a supporter of capitalism and wanted social reform. Churchill was also a liberal.
While there are many differences between these two men, there are also some similarities. Hitler and Churchill both were anti-socialists and hated communism. By not altering their message to suit their audience, but by carrying on insisting that they were right, they both garnered huge support when events finally seemed to confirm their view of the political situation. Both men also fought in WW1. They both also had excellent war tactics.
In conclusion, Winston Churchill and Adolf Hitler were two dissimilar war leaders with little in common. One of these leaders was an example of something that should not be repeated in history. The other was a great man trying to win the war for the better. The things that set them apart are what made them the leaders that they were. The things they had in common also set them apart and greatly affected their alliances and war tactics. Their political ideologies, treatment of their citizens, and goals for the war are the similarities and differences between these