Essay On Brain Identity Theory

Great Essays
What does it mean to say that brain states and processes are identical with the mental states and processes? Mention four objections to this theory along with Smart’s reply to the same.
The brain-mind identity theory (also known as physicalism) claims that the mental states and processes are identical to the processes and states of the brain. This does not, however, imply that the mind is the brain or vice versa. For instance, in saying that ‘Tom has a good mind’, we are not referring to his brain and claiming that ‘Tom has a good brain’. Thus, we are not saying that the mind and brain are the same but are identical in their states and processes. The brain-mind identity theory (hereon called ‘identity theory) does not merely claim that the brain states and processes are correlated to the mind states and processes but that the mental states are the brain states and so for the processes. This article is divided into three parts: Part 1 talks about the psychoneural correlations and how the identity theory is the best explanation for the
…show more content…
The Normal Percepient: He introduces the idea of a normal percepient and says that A is more of a normal percepient than B if he pick out a lettuce leaf from cabbage bundle and B cannot even though B can pick it out of a betroot pack. Thus, A has higher level of color discrimination. But A can be trained to say, 'This is red' without knowing what normal percepient or objects of red are. Thus, it is only a matter of training a person to identify the qualities.
2. A person can know the meaning of 'red' without knowing or being able to recognize objects of red: like- red is the color of the sun on a warm afternoon or that red is this

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    In this paper, I will define and describe the mind body problem, defend the position of property dualism, support my claim through the problem of personal identity and the problem of interaction, and provide one refute using epiphenomenalism. The mind-body problem the question of how our consciousness is created through the interaction of mental and brain states. The best way to describe the interaction between mental and brain states is through property dualism. A supporting argument for property dualism is through the problem of personal identity. Through the problem of interacting, property dualism is further strengthened as an accurate way to describe the mind-body problem.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay Of Supervenience

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This has been the problem of the reductive approach: in the case of the mind; for example, Identity theory (Place, 1956, Smart 1959) suggests that the mental is just a process in the brain. This…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Christian Park Assignment #6 In this paper, I will define two concepts of personal identity, one being the Ego Theory, and the other being the Bundle Theory. By presenting examples of teletransportation and split-brain patients, I will show that the Bundle Theory is more plausible, which indicates that our natural beliefs of personal identity are false and inconclusive. According to the Ego Theory, a person existing over time is explained by a continued existence of a subject of experiences. The consciousness of a person is unified at any moment of time because there there is only one person having many experiences at that moment.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He added that the mental cannot exist outside the body, and the body cannot think (Sober, 2013). However, he did not deny that interactions took place between the two such that, for example, Advil can be used to treat headaches or desires can make the body move (Sober, 2013, p. 204). On the other hand, the Mind/Brain Identity Theory holds that the mind and the brain are one and the same object. Moreover, it claims that mental events can be correlated with physical events in the brain, such that, for example, headaches are a result of specific changes of chemical activity in the brain (Sober, 2013, p.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay “An Argument for Animalism” by Eric T. Olson, he concludes that personal identity is psychological continuity. I will disagree with Olson’s ideas about personal identity in the brain-transplant and the thinking-animal argument. The main point of the paper is about animalism. Olson’s argument is that each one of us is numerically identical to a human animal. Olson says that a person could exist who is not numerically identical to any animal, but it’s not the case for you and I. Olson, then presents his ‘Thinking-Animal Argument’ and the alternatives to that.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parfit Argumentative Essay

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If a mad scientist were to transplant half of my brain into someone else’s brainless body, and the other half of my brain into a second’s person’s brainless body, which person would I be? Would I be neither of them or would I be just one of them? Assuming that my personal “fission” could support all of my mental life, According to Parfit’s article Personal Identity, personal identity does not matter and that I would be the same person at first but afterwards both people will become different people. Parfit sketches a theme called, “reductionist” thesis that personal identity through time is constituted by relations between mental and physical events in the absence of anything like a necessarily determinate, indivisible soul. The second theme is given reductionism; some of our commonsensical beliefs about rationality and morality need to be revised.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, theories of personal identity attempt to answer the question of personal identity by giving examples…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mental life or psyche is understood as a bodily organ (the brain) plus the acts of consciousness. In The Dissection of the Psychical Personality, Freud discusses the psychic nature of the human mind. He begins by that One thing we know about ourselves is the never-ending conflict between our instinctual desires and our endeavor to resist them. In other words, personality, what makes the “I” is a product of how mental forces interact. Later he terms the region where instincts lie the id and the region that resists or controls them the ego.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Synesthesia Research Paper

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “My mother taught me to read when I was four, and the letters in the words that I saw had specific colors. She used black and white flash cards so I don't know where the color came from.” (“Synesthesia Interview”). This is a common scenario for a Synesthetic. Tasting colors, seeing colors from certain sounds, and other examples of types of Synesthesia may just seem ludicrous to the average person, but this condition seems normal to Synesthetic and often is not identified until adulthood!…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dualism Vs Physicalism

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The view of physicalism gives a stronger and more plausible answer to the mind-body problem. There are several reasons why this particular view gives a more sensible for answer to the problem at hand. These reasons include the rationale behind the reasoning of brain research, how the different aspects of reductive physicalism is able to address the non-physical aspects of the mind, as well as the less than sensible claims that the opposing view, dualism, presents in comparison. One of the main reasons why physicalism is able to prove itself to be the better answer to the mind-body problem is based off of research that society has learned about on the brain.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analyzing “Brainology” In the following essay, we will analyze and discuss the article “Brainology” by Carol Dweck. Starting off by the title, the opening paragraphs, the claim, the author’s purpose, methods, persona and closing paragraphs as well. Because I believe Dweck’s article was more effective than ineffective, reasons of why I believe she could've done a better work will be discussed and explained in short. The title the author chooses for this article, “ Brainology”, introduces the audience to what she will be talking about, it is important to point out that the word “brainology’ induces us to think of a very broad topic which could be understood as a study of the brain.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his paper, The Nature of Mental States, Hilary Putnam advocates for functionalism, the idea that the mind is defined by what it does, rather than what it is composed of. The mind serves a purpose similar to that of a machine, taking various inputs, performing a function, and producing certain outputs. He contests the arguments of the brain-state theory which claims that mental processes and brain processes are the same. I will claim that Putnam’s argument for functionalism is successful because he does not place limits on the inputs for functions, limit the function of the mind to only humans, and limit the number of functions that can be performed.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Title: Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind Author: Dr. V. S. Ramachandran, Sandra Blakeslee About the author: Dr. V. S. Ramachandran is a professor of neurology and psychology at the University of California, San Diego, and Sandra Blakeslee reports on Science for The New York Times. All about Phantoms The book describes Dr. Ramachandran's experiences with patients who had clinical problems and provides an insight into how the human brain works. Dr. Ramachandran describes fascinating clinical syndromes in his own peculiar style. In this book, he makes an attempt to understand why brain damage can make someone think his parents are impostors, or a woman with a stroke laugh uncontrollably; how a man with a stroke can be unaware that his left side is paralyzed, or why certain types of epileptic patients have intense religious experiences.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Intellect:Mind over Matter, Mortimer Adler probes the relationship between the mind and the body. He describes the four main theories regarding this relationship and separates them into two categories: extreme and moderate. Among the four theories, Adler argues in favor of moderate immaterialism. His argument is easily the most convincing as it accounts for the essential difference between man and animal, our intellect, while acknowledging the congruity between the mind and body.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The beginning of understanding oneself starts with identity. For centuries, philosophers have contemplated a common issue known as the mind-body problem. The mind-body problem is a philosophical problem that asks the question of what we as people are. Are people a mind, a body, or a combination of the two? There are several major works that pertain to this problem, but this argument will focus on those given by Gilbert Ryle, Rene Descartes, and Richard Taylor.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays