This means the holiday cancellation which the company requested would have negative effects on Borries social life. There is another dilemma created by Borries by accepting to cancel his trip to work on the advertisement project from the client. At the workplace, Borries was criticised by fellow employees for refusing to take his trip. Some termed him as a coward stating he would have refused to work on the project and proceed on his holiday. Others saw Borries’ act as one that would affect their future holidays and trips while working at the company. How are any of us be able to say no if we are asked to give up our holidays? The rights theory is a normative ethical model that can be used to discuss and evaluate the nature of above case.
…show more content…
Egoism is acting within the one’s selfish interest. It is mature supposition to note the advertising agency placed its interests before that of the employee. The dilemma presented in above case is that of the conflict of interests. Meeting clients’ expectations at the expense of the employee’s time off was an egocentric move by the company. The second theory, utilitarianism model, strives to bring benefits to the majority. The move of cancelling Borries trip attracted controversy in the entire workforce. Other employees felt the same situation would face them and they gradually began losing trust in the agency. The situation did not serve the needs of the majority. Rather, it put the interests of the client and compromised the trust of the majority; employees and …show more content…
Integrative analysis of above cases makes it easy to generate different and contrasting views from students and therefore cross-learning. When students realize their fellow friends have opposing views to an issue, some are likely to expand their thinking on the dimension projected by their colleagues. Above is not only an important part of integrative learning, it also promotes the much-needed interaction, association, and collaboration among scholars. The module served above needs and made it possible to develop team work and interpersonal skills. What is more is that the case studies presented a bench-mark for scholars to investigate on issues concurrently and develop solutions as a
Egoism is acting within the one’s selfish interest. It is mature supposition to note the advertising agency placed its interests before that of the employee. The dilemma presented in above case is that of the conflict of interests. Meeting clients’ expectations at the expense of the employee’s time off was an egocentric move by the company. The second theory, utilitarianism model, strives to bring benefits to the majority. The move of cancelling Borries trip attracted controversy in the entire workforce. Other employees felt the same situation would face them and they gradually began losing trust in the agency. The situation did not serve the needs of the majority. Rather, it put the interests of the client and compromised the trust of the majority; employees and …show more content…
Integrative analysis of above cases makes it easy to generate different and contrasting views from students and therefore cross-learning. When students realize their fellow friends have opposing views to an issue, some are likely to expand their thinking on the dimension projected by their colleagues. Above is not only an important part of integrative learning, it also promotes the much-needed interaction, association, and collaboration among scholars. The module served above needs and made it possible to develop team work and interpersonal skills. What is more is that the case studies presented a bench-mark for scholars to investigate on issues concurrently and develop solutions as a