Bill C-51 Research Paper

Improved Essays
This paper will argue; Justin Trudeau, the leader of the Liberal Party of Canada and the recently elected Prime minister of the country, has conveyed the important need to amending Bill C-51 as he and many Canadians believe that it is contradictory to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom. The emphasis on the bill has been due to various reasons but among the main reasons, the Liberal party believes that there is disparity with the Charter of Rights and Freedom. Most importantly it is the job of the government to ensure that its people are given the Rights and freedom every individual in a country deserves. Typically that has been the case in most cases, however when Bill C-51 was introduced, there was confusion amongst people as they were not able to grasp …show more content…
Justin Trudeau, who strongly supports reform liberalism, along with his party, the Liberal Party of Canada, strongly believes that if the Bill C-51 is amended, an individual can obtain freedom and rights. The current situation is highly different, where an individual cannot reach full development due to terror or anxiety. Under the Bill C-51, if a person is seen as a threat to national security, his information can be shared among seventeen government departments. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) also has the authority to access his personal information including social networks and bank accounts (Watters, 2015). Similarly, a person can go to jail for up to five years for promoting terrorism, irrespective of the fact if the act has been carried out or not. This is a rather vague term as it does not give clear and precise evidence as to on what exact grounds is the individual being arrested. For all we know, the person may not even belong to any terrorist group or have any affiliation with a terrorist attack. Yet still find himself in jail on the basis of "promoting"

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Pros And Cons Of C-51

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Summary: On Thursday, June 18, 2015 the conservative government of Canada received royal assent for a new piece of anti-terror legislation which will give expanded, controversial, and sweeping powers to Canada’s spy agency; the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service (CSIC). Because of the very radical changes C-51 proposes to the current terror prevention structure in Canada, many have simultaneously criticized and praised it. With opponents stipulating that because of the bill’s vague wording, doors can potentially be opened to police abuse of power, and the reduction of civil liberties (specifically free speech). While proponents (backed by the Minister of Public Safety Steven Blaney) of the changes argue that in light of the relatively recent terrorist attacks on Parliament Hill and in Quebec, this bill is necessary to keep Canadians safe.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the hallmarks of Stephen Harper’s tenure as Prime Minister was the adversarial relationship between Parliament and the courts. His government was “openly hostile towards the judicial branch” and often failed to take its Charter duties seriously. Harper’s lack of deference for the right and freedoms entrenched in the Charter led to several of his government’s laws being struck down by the Supreme Court of Canada. Conversely, the appeal of Frank v. Canada was a victory for the Conservative government – although the impugned legislation had been enacted over a decade before Harper became Prime Minister. It is still possible for the challenged sections of the Canada Elections Act to be declared unconstitutional, however, as the case is being appealed in the SCC.…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He asks the reader to consider the common objections to Charters, explained previously, and then elucidates: “In each case we can see that the criticism is premised on the following critical assumption: Charters aspire to embody fixed points of agreement on and pre-commitment to moral limits on government power .” But what if they weren’t is the unspoken implication that follows it, and that is precisely the point that Waluchow is trying to make . Basing his argument on the previous work of H.L.A. Hart, as well as from the “Persons Case” ― or rather, Edwards v Canada (AG) ― Waluchow describes his conception of a Charter is as a living tree; keeping the benefits of entrenched Charters while avoiding the majority of the criticisms from Waldron . A middle way, then ― a constitutional modesty which uses a common law understanding to give the Charter the freedom and flexibility it requires to grow and adapt to a changing environment, while maintaining the “fixity of entrenched, written law ”.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in Canada, the final court of appeal, and the last legal resort for all litigants; therefore, the Supreme Court of Canada decisions are the ultimate expression and application of Canadian law (Supreme Court of Canada tour). The landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in the R v. Keegstra case regarding the freedom of expression portrays the theoretical concepts behind the court’s ruling as it is the job of the court to deliver a fair decision to the parties involved, as well as a decision that maintains law and order in society. The R v. Keegstra ruling contains insights from the consensus theory and the labelling theory, as the decision of the court was in the interest of the public. To better understand a criminal law case and come up with a conclusion, the theory used must have a valid structure and must follow the rules of critical thinking and logic (Boyd, Cartwright and Heidt, 2015: 120). Also, the purpose of the criminal law must be understood as criminal law serves a purpose, which takes into account some theoretical aspects of the consensus theory and…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was many complaints later that it was sought out to be good news to hear that the Act was to be amended in 2015. Unfortunately, the news was not what Canadians hoped for, as the amendments consisted of limiting Canadians’ freedom of expression and their ability to engage in proper democratic debates. Bill C-51 also states that police would be allowed to detain possible terrorists for seven days instead of the…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill C-24 In Canada

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Laws are created to maintain order in society, protect and enforce people’s rights and forbid certain actions. Laws are created in the interest of society but some can harm Canadians in the process. One of the laws that harm Canadians is Bill C- 24. Bill C-24 enables the Government of Canada to revoke citizenship of individuals convicted of heinous crimes, who are considered dual citizens. According to the Government of Canada, these crimes include “terrorism, high treason, treason, or spying offences, depending on the sentence received, or for serving as a member of an armed force of a country or organized armed group engaged in armed conflict with Canada, the person becomes a foreign national” (Government of Canada, 2015).…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Diefenbaker and the Canadian Bill of Rights John Diefenbaker was the thirteenth Prime minister of Canada. He was elected in 1957, forming the Progressive Conservative Government, and from the beginning of his campaign, he made it a promise that he would create a Bill of Rights for Canada. He was a very progressive Prime Minister who believed in equality and fairness, “Diefenbaker brought diversity into government- he appointed the first woman to a cabinet post and the first Aboriginal person to the Senate.” (Canadian Decades 1960, p. 20) Citizens of Canada appreciated his dedication, and his commitment both to the Bill of Rights and to Canada deserves recognition. There was reasons that Canada needed a Bill of Rights.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Canadian Charter Preamble

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The preamble to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom states, “Canada is grounded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God” (Russell 1999). According to Russell (1999), this can also be considered the “God-clause.” The three articles discuss this notion of stating “the supremacy of God” in the preamble of the Canadian Charter. Although the articles have different views about the preamble, I highly agree with Russell’s (1999) article titled, “The Supremacy of God does not belong in the Constitution”. To begin with, Russell’s (1999) overall argument is that ‘God’ should not be mentioned in the preamble of the Canadian Charter.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms forms the first part of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Charter guarantees civil rights to everyone in Canada and was designed to unify Canadians. The Charter was signed into law by Queen Elizabeth II of Canada on April 17, 1982 along with the rest of the Act. “However, the Bill of Rights is only a federal statute, rather than a constitutional document.” (Wikipedia 04/06/15)…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Canada Women’s right has been improved enormously. After WWII due to their participation in war, women were starting to be treated more fairly than before, but not equally as men. There were many factors that oppressed women in their daily life. Since the 1950s, many individuals and groups of women’s fought to improve women equal rights and attempt to involve in social, environmental and political roles equivalent to men. In the last 60 years, Canada has taken steps to improve women’s right; introducing the equal pay for equal work Act, allowing women to participate and have a high position in politics, and one of the biggest steps Canada has taken to improve women’s right is included equal treatment for men and women in The Charter Rights and Freedom.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The entrenchment of the Canadian Charter of Rights and its relation to democracy in Canada has been at the core of many debates throughout the years. A democratic government is one that allows the people to have a direct hand in what goes on in their country and some believe that entrenching the charter of rights in the constitution is a violation of the principles of this democracy. Although the charter of rights is entrenched, the charter of rights is very abstract in its rules and allows for flexibility when decisions are made. Adding to this, section 1 and 33 of the charter of rights is explicit in overcoming the argument that the entrenchment of the charter of rights violates any principles of democracy. Throughout my essay, I will argue…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bill C-51 Pros And Cons

    • 2281 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The controversy of Bill C-51 comes from the dilemma it creates between the necessity to protect the population and the right to privacy. One hand, the bill is an attempt to preserve the Canadian national security and on the other hand, it violates the citizen’s fundamental…

    • 2281 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Charter of Rights and Freedoms was established in 1982 and since its creation it has made a huge impact on the legal and political landscape of Canada. Some believe that the Charter has undermined democracy and put too much power into the hands of the courts that are not elected by the people. Some also contest that the Canadian courts are becoming lawmakers and are becoming activists. However, these claims have little truth when looking at what the Supreme Court has accomplished since the enactment of the Charter. The courts use and distribute their power conservatively because of how it effects the Canadian political landscape.…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms can be seen as all-encompassing, and yet, it does not dictate the rules to follow regarding a major component of each person’s life: employment. Or does it? A vast portion of our lives in Canada is spent working, and regardless of the work environment, we interact with other people who may or may not come from the same backgrounds and ideologies as we do. With no specific terminology in the Charter that includes employment law, we must look between the lines and find the connections that lay within. The Charter provides the roadmap for Canadian principles and social values; it lays out the rights and freedoms we have as a people, and promotes the protection of those human rights through its laws.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bill C-51 is meant to proactively combat terrorism by extending the powers of Canada’s intelligence agency, CSIS, and the police (Merolli, 2016). Aspects of the bill have vague terminology such as the prosecution of acts that “promote” terrorism, which has problematic implications. Bill C-51 transfers more power to executive institutions without clear mechanisms for ensuring their accountability…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays