Big Republic Pros And Cons

Decent Essays
Big Republic Essay During 1787, when the Constitution was written, framers sought to create a government in which power was limited so that the people’s liberty would not be threatened. As a result of many debates and discussions, many framers believed that a republican government would abate the threat of tyranny and would grant power to the people instead of a democratic government. A democracy (democratic government) is a form of government in which the power of the majority rules. A republic (republican government) is a form of government in which the people and elected representatives rule according to the law. Representatives would decide policies through a process that was longer and took the protection of individual rights into account, which in turn led to more thought out policies, unlike a democracy. When compared, a democratic government places no constraints on the majority rule while a republican government has limited power. The Federalist Papers were a collection of essays that argued for the ratification of the United States Constitution. Within these essays, Federalist No. 10 received vast recognition. This essay was …show more content…
Some advantages of a larger republic are that it would better represent the public’s voice and control the effects of factions. Madison argued that in a big republic, the population is greater; therefore the probability of electing capable representatives are larger and the voters have more options. A larger republic can control the effects of factions because there would be representative making decisions for the republic and there would be a variety of interests so a majority faction would be more difficult to come to. Another advantage to a larger republic is less corrupt delegates. Since there are more voters in a larger area, the delegate would need much more money to bribe. Currently, a successful large republic is the United

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The governments had rights that benefited the country and people. The Federalist Papers created a new government and protected against…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution is a very significant document throughout US history. However, during the ratification of the Constitution, many people had differences in opinions. The two groups who argued over the ratification were the Federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists were the ones in favor of the new constitution’s balance of power between the states and the national government. Important members of this group were George Washington, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the constitutional convention, the federalist and the anti-federalist went head to head trying to create new laws for government. Many articles were written by James Madison; these articles were the federalist papers. Within these paper, Madison outlines that the constitution protects against tyranny by dividing power between state and government, by separating government into branches, having a checks and balances system, and having equal state representation among the states. In document A, James Madison states that power is “First divided between two distinct governments, state and federal.” This describes the idea of federalism, where state and federal governments share power; powers like declaring war and printing money belong…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How did the Constitution guard against tyranny? In the summer of 1787, delegates met to fix the government that was under the very weak Articles of Confederation which was causing a lot of problems. They decided to create the Constitution and tried to make sure that tyranny would not be possible. The constitution guarded against tyranny by practicing federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and representative democracy.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us Constitution Dbq

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages

    During the reign of ancient Rome, they had adapted the title of a Roman Republic. A republic is a form of rule in which citizens elect representatives to carry out government positions and responsibilities. In ancient Rome, the two leaders, as well as other political officials, were elected by the people in order to make policy decisions on their behalf. Similarly, the United States Constitution is a republic, where citizens are able to elect representatives, such as congressmen, to carry out political responsibilities for them. While under the British rule, the American colonists were not allowed to hold elections to choose representatives to be in Parliament.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Anti-Federalists argued that a stronger national government must be accompanied by explicit safeguards against tyranny. The Anti-Federalists supported states’ rights. 20. What were the Federalists Papers and why were they so critical to ratification of the Constitution?…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalist prevailed because they identified the proper path to American prosperity. Centralization is an imperative facet of a successful national government, thus eliminating governmental dissention between states. A sectionalist government was not adequate for the United Sates, a newborn nation requiring unity. The Federalists and Republican debate can be justifiably attributed as the fountainhead of the political party system. The ratification of the Constitution outlines the powers and rights of the government, ensuring the citizens free from oppression and tyranny.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John P. Roche gives his case that proposes that the form of the Constitution was simply a representative development involving a compromise of the interests of the state, economy, and governmental concentrations. In John P. Roche’s argument he states that the government was as democratic as possible: “My concern is with the further position that not only were they revolutionaries, but also they were democrats. Indeed, in my view, there is one fundamental truth about the Founding Fathers…: They were first and foremost superb democratic politicians…”[1]. He continues by stating that what they did was create a practical compromise that would support both the national interest and be something that the people would agree with. They started with the Virginia plan that proposed a bicameral legislative branch.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Protection of rights was the key driving force in the creation of the establishment. From the opposing force in the infantile stages of government were men who strongly believed that republican form of government would be able…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Secondly, a strong national government can help achieve greater social, political and economical equality among its citizen. Also a strong national government is more likely to make foreign policy decisions that benefit the nation in comparison to a strong state government that prioritized the benefit of the state. A strong national Government can also provide unity among people; it enhances a strong sense of national pride and patriotism. On the other hand, there are also some disadvantages about…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Brutus Anti Federalism

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In Federalist number 10, as has been previously argued in this paper, a republican system of government is able to control any abusive government. Additionally, a republican government is able to control any abusive majority from taking advantage of the rights of the minority. Therefore, through this type of government the “public good and the rights of other citizens” is respected. As mentioned before in Federalist number 51, Madison writes that the individual rights and interest of every citizen is connected to the Constitution. Furthermore, in a republic the citizens surrender their rights to a single government.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Benjamin Franklin, one of the Founding Fathers of America was once asked the question, “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a Republic or Monarchy?” He responded, “A Republic, if you can keep it.” The United States of America is undeniably a Republic. The people have the power to elect representatives to be a voice for them. To clarify, the people have power.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In regards to those in favor of the Constitution, Federalists were those who viewed the…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Federalist Summary

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Federalist is around 85 articles and papers written by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison. (1) The papers initially had no author in New York daily papers in 1787 and 1788 to urge ratification of the U.S. Constitution. With the Constitution requiring endorsement from nine of thirteen expresses, the press was immersed with letters about the questionable record. (2) Commended statesmen Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay said something with a progression of expositions under the pen name, contending that the proposed framework would save the Union and engage the government to act solidly and rationally in the national interest.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays