Big Republic Pros And Cons

Decent Essays
Big Republic Essay During 1787, when the Constitution was written, framers sought to create a government in which power was limited so that the people’s liberty would not be threatened. As a result of many debates and discussions, many framers believed that a republican government would abate the threat of tyranny and would grant power to the people instead of a democratic government. A democracy (democratic government) is a form of government in which the power of the majority rules. A republic (republican government) is a form of government in which the people and elected representatives rule according to the law. Representatives would decide policies through a process that was longer and took the protection of individual rights into account, which in turn led to more thought out policies, unlike a democracy. When compared, a democratic government places no constraints on the majority rule while a republican government has limited power. The Federalist Papers were a collection of essays that argued for the ratification of the United States Constitution. Within these essays, Federalist No. 10 received vast recognition. This essay was …show more content…
Some advantages of a larger republic are that it would better represent the public’s voice and control the effects of factions. Madison argued that in a big republic, the population is greater; therefore the probability of electing capable representatives are larger and the voters have more options. A larger republic can control the effects of factions because there would be representative making decisions for the republic and there would be a variety of interests so a majority faction would be more difficult to come to. Another advantage to a larger republic is less corrupt delegates. Since there are more voters in a larger area, the delegate would need much more money to bribe. Currently, a successful large republic is the United

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    At the Constitutional Convention, the fifty-five delegates come together to make brilliant laws to prevent tyranny in their country. In documents A,C, and D, it lists the laws that made the United States more of a democracy rather than a republic. The delegates established federalism to prevent tyranny in the Unites States by.... “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.”…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How did the Constitution guard against tyranny? In the summer of 1787, delegates met to fix the government that was under the very weak Articles of Confederation which was causing a lot of problems. They decided to create the Constitution and tried to make sure that tyranny would not be possible. The constitution guarded against tyranny by practicing federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and representative democracy.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the constitutional convention, the federalist and the anti-federalist went head to head trying to create new laws for government. Many articles were written by James Madison; these articles were the federalist papers. Within these paper, Madison outlines that the constitution protects against tyranny by dividing power between state and government, by separating government into branches, having a checks and balances system, and having equal state representation among the states. In document A, James Madison states that power is “First divided between two distinct governments, state and federal.” This describes the idea of federalism, where state and federal governments share power; powers like declaring war and printing money belong…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us Constitution Dbq

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages

    During the reign of ancient Rome, they had adapted the title of a Roman Republic. A republic is a form of rule in which citizens elect representatives to carry out government positions and responsibilities. In ancient Rome, the two leaders, as well as other political officials, were elected by the people in order to make policy decisions on their behalf. Similarly, the United States Constitution is a republic, where citizens are able to elect representatives, such as congressmen, to carry out political responsibilities for them. While under the British rule, the American colonists were not allowed to hold elections to choose representatives to be in Parliament.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Anti-Federalists argued that a stronger national government must be accompanied by explicit safeguards against tyranny. The Anti-Federalists supported states’ rights. 20. What were the Federalists Papers and why were they so critical to ratification of the Constitution?…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalist prevailed because they identified the proper path to American prosperity. Centralization is an imperative facet of a successful national government, thus eliminating governmental dissention between states. A sectionalist government was not adequate for the United Sates, a newborn nation requiring unity. The Federalists and Republican debate can be justifiably attributed as the fountainhead of the political party system. The ratification of the Constitution outlines the powers and rights of the government, ensuring the citizens free from oppression and tyranny.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John P. Roche gives his case that proposes that the form of the Constitution was simply a representative development involving a compromise of the interests of the state, economy, and governmental concentrations. In John P. Roche’s argument he states that the government was as democratic as possible: “My concern is with the further position that not only were they revolutionaries, but also they were democrats. Indeed, in my view, there is one fundamental truth about the Founding Fathers…: They were first and foremost superb democratic politicians…”[1]. He continues by stating that what they did was create a practical compromise that would support both the national interest and be something that the people would agree with. They started with the Virginia plan that proposed a bicameral legislative branch.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The creation of a republic serves as a control for the effects of factions. Factions emerge when groups of people feel their ideas are not being heard and accounted for in government. Madison describes these groups as having interests against the interests of the whole country. The design of a republic, especially the one created in the Constitution, encourages representatives from various interest groups to have a voice in lawmaking. Therefore, controlling factions is a matter of having elected officials to represent different groups.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Under the pseudonym Publius, James Madison wrote Federalist Paper #10 to try to encourage the state governments to ratify the constitution. In this essay, Madison argued that a Republic, specifically the Republic proposed within the Constitution, would provide the perfect balance between the rights of the citizens and national security. In a direct democracy, there are no checks in place to ensure that the government is functioning as it should. A few dissenters can gather a following and cause problems within the government. This type of government, according to Madison, gives the people too much power and subsequently fails to effectively maintain social order.…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Of Rights Dbq

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The constitution was a carefully constructed confabulation based on the philosophy of John Hobbes and John Calvin. It was not necessarily designed to confuse the constituency and create a transient democracy, but to balance power between mob rule and rule by monarchy by creating an enduring republic. The constitution was based off of Hobbes and Calvin to a small degree, as the Fathers believed the people did not always know what was right and they feared being overthrown by mob rule. However, they feared tyranny even more, and wanted to create a system of government to avoid this from occurring. True democracy would lead to either of those occurring, so they created a system to express what the majority of the people though with a system of…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Dbq

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    And the ability for the document to be amended for changing times and situations is proof of innovative thinking from the founding fathers. Furthermore, this union of ideals and standards created a government that is “both specific enough to outline the basic powers of our government and flexible (through the process of amendments) that it meets the challenges of contemporary life. It is not a static document of the late 18th century, but a living and breathing source of democracy” (Political Science Research Paper Topic Suggestions on the…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Benjamin Franklin, one of the Founding Fathers of America was once asked the question, “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a Republic or Monarchy?” He responded, “A Republic, if you can keep it.” The United States of America is undeniably a Republic. The people have the power to elect representatives to be a voice for them. To clarify, the people have power.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Secondly, a strong national government can help achieve greater social, political and economical equality among its citizen. Also a strong national government is more likely to make foreign policy decisions that benefit the nation in comparison to a strong state government that prioritized the benefit of the state. A strong national Government can also provide unity among people; it enhances a strong sense of national pride and patriotism. On the other hand, there are also some disadvantages about…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In regards to those in favor of the Constitution, Federalists were those who viewed the…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Federalist Summary

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Federalist is around 85 articles and papers written by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison. (1) The papers initially had no author in New York daily papers in 1787 and 1788 to urge ratification of the U.S. Constitution. With the Constitution requiring endorsement from nine of thirteen expresses, the press was immersed with letters about the questionable record. (2) Commended statesmen Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay said something with a progression of expositions under the pen name, contending that the proposed framework would save the Union and engage the government to act solidly and rationally in the national interest.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays