According to Wikipedia, “Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion”. In every area, unless we are stating our own opinion, evidence is the fundamental building block for making an argument. Any audience, requires an appropriate amount of evidence to believe in the veracity of a presenter’s argument. In the following writing, I will be going through my recent experience in presenting the topic, “Australia SHOULD NOT cull its feral cat population to protect its local native species”. I will go over the logical flow that I followed through the presentation.
I began with making my audience familiar with the topic that I was going to present, providing required definitions from reliable sources. …show more content…
There are times when you can use other forms of evidence such as anecdotal, analogical, circumstantial, or demonstrative evidence and tie it back to your argument [1]. But whenever such type of evidence is used, it becomes mandatory to tie it back to the topic. According to the Writing Tutorial services (WTS), Indiana University Bloomington, strong use of evidence covers making the argument, putting forward the evidence in support of your claim and explaining how your evidence supports the argument that you are making [2]. There always needs to be a logical flow of structure to keep your presentation coherent and well understood by the audience. In my presentation, I provided an alternate solution to prevent the problem caused by feral cats in Australia. Instead of killing cats, I proposed trapping, neutering and releasing approach(TNR) and claimed that it was more effective than killing. I first presented how killing cats will not be effective in the long run as it is impossible to catch and kill all cats in a country. There would remain some cats and they would breed raining the population again. And after proposing