Philip Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment

Improved Essays
Stanford Experiment
They lost their sanity, behavior changed without even realizing when it did, being in a prison can change people, well at least it did in Phillip Zimbardo 's Stanford Prison Experiment. The experiment was instructed by Zimbardo a psychologist at Stanford University, who wanted to learn how people would conform to the roles of being a prisoner and a guard to simulate prison life. Although these boys were actors, not real prisoners or guards their reaction was shocking because they behavior 's changed a lot within six days. Many behaviors that happen in this study could have been activated because of testosterone in men, which can change behaviors when levels rise. Although many changes in behavior, there is an endless possibility
…show more content…
Stanford study participants should relate to this because as for the guards they took no respect for the prisoners. They were dehumanized like they were trash, the guards began to behave very brutal and apparently they began to enjoy the way of their behavior was. The prisoners became submissive and the guards more assertive, As time went on the prisoners felt dependent on the prison guards, they tried everything to please the guards so maybe their behavior would change. Respect and social roles are important when it comes to situations such as authority and respect towards others, ""It is thus important to investigate how relationships between respect and negative social behavior may change according to social behavior"(Bettencourt A. Julia). As Julia states Behavior may change according to social negative social roles. The prison experiment did have a negative to it, just for being a prison and also having people who have never been incarcerated taking part may have caused changes. Soon the prisoners started to tell tales on other prisoners to gain that respect they wanted. The prisoners just wanted that respect from the guards, but they never received it because the guards were too tied into their authority figure which took over the respect there is for anyone. For many "Respect is directed towards dominant peers" (Clemans, Katherine H. Graber). In other words, Clemens believes peers who have more dominant power towards others get that respect. I agree that respect is given to those who have higher authority, allowing those to have that dominant authority can change social behaviors towards other. One example I have seen this happen was when I was employed in my last employment which had many supervisors who got that respect from employees with a lower position. Just like in the study like the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What happens when good people are put in an evil place? What about when innocent individuals are systematically punished and humiliated? Is human identity rooted in one 's situation? A 1971 endeavor, now known as Zimbardo 's Prison Experiment, attempted to explore these questions and others.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1971, an experiment took place in Stanford, California. It was named the Stanford Prison Experiment, lasting what was meant to be two weeks, but due to the brutality of the trial, lasted a mere 6 days. Its purpose was to conduct a study on humanity and show just how evil a human can get when given a position of power. To summarize the experiment, a random 18 men were chosen, all innocent, good people who’d never committed a crime. They were divided into two groups erratically: 9 being “prisoners” and 9 being “guards.”…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    WHY WAS STANFORD’S PRISON EXPERIMENT CONDUCTED? In order to study psychological effects of prison life a experiment was conducted called “Stanford Prison Experiment”. The psychologists wanted to study what were the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. To do this experiment, a team of researchers led by the famous psychology professor named, “Philip Zimbardo” finally decided to set up a replicated prison so that they can carefully note effects of the behavior of all those within the walls of prison.…

    • 2257 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This came at cost with the catastrophic effects the experiment brought on the participants. The Stanford prison Experiment is noted as a “classic experiment in the psychology of human behavior (Onishi & Herbert, 2016). In this experiment, Professor Phillip Zimbardo wanted to study the effects of labels and…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A few good men Comparative Analysis Obedience to authority is something that is drilled into almost every child in almost every culture. We've been taught to always obey your elders, and always listen to the directions given. All throughout school you’ve been made to not question the system or what the teachers tell you. This contributes to later on in the life of military personnel, who are made into soldiers with blinding loyalty.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An ideal example of the emotional effect on prisoners is prisoner #8162. With less than 36 hours passing, #8162 began to suffer extreme emotional distress, sorrow, disorganized thinking, and anger. He became engulfed in the experiment and forgot that it was fake, telling other prisoners they cannot leave and then going on psychotic rages. Because of the severe effects he was suffering from, the researchers had not choice but to let him leave, making him understand that the prison was fabricated for an experiment that he volunteered for. Considering these findings, the conclusion for the Stanford Prison Experiment is that people will gladly conform to the social roles of their specific environment and take on the tendencies of their stereotyped roles (institutional power).…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Report on the Stanford Prison Experiment for PSYC 1111 The Office of Naval Research sponsored a study at Stanford University to "develop a better understanding of the basic psychological mechanisms underlying human aggression" and to identify which conditions can lead to aggression when men are living in close quarters for a long period of time (Haney, C., Banks, W.C. & Zimbardo, P.G. (1973)). This experiment took form within a model prison created in the basement at Stanford University to discover the variables found in prisons that can lead to aggression in people, i.e. guards and prisoners. The hypothesis explored was that ‘guards’ and ‘prisoners’ would react in different ways and their behavior and state of being would differ from each…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    “Guards” were given special uniforms as well, and given ambiguous instructions about how to treat the prisoners. Clearly, the participants of the study were regular college students. They were not evil or sadistic people. Despite being normal people, when given unrestricted power over others, and put in a caustic group environment, good men turned evil. It did not take long for the guards to begin abusing the prisoners.…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment What prevented "good guards" from objecting or countermanding the orders from tough or bad guards? The good guards were unable to object or countermand the bad guards because of the fear of what it would do to the guards’ authoritative role in the eyes of the prisoners. If they showed disunity as guards the prisoners could take advantage of the unstructured and create chaos within the walls of the prison. By objecting to the bad guards, they take the risk of the prisoners not taking the guards orders seriously.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment Does giving one person more power than another really change the way that they will react in a certain situation? Do certain circumstances cause a different reaction in different people? That was the question for the Stanford Prison Experiment performed by Phil Zimbardo in 1971. In an attempt to show what life was like to be in prison, the inmates and guards of Stanford County Jail, were placed in an almost inhumane setting. The tyranny of the men in charge, along with the abuse of the inmates, goes to show how people that are placed in an environment and told to play roles that they are not necessarily familiar with, can go wrong.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zimbardo’s Stanford prison experiment revealed how social roles can influence our behavior. The subjects were randomly assigned to play the role of “prisoner” or “guard.” The attitudes and morals of the prison guards changed due to their role as prison guards. They mistreated the prisoners and made them feel less than a…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    His role in the experiment was to ensure that the prison environment was realistic, having had 17 years of experience in San Quentin. Prescott inspired many of the cruel punishments given to the subjects. He even forgot that this was a simulation and became just as corrupt as leaders of the prison systems that he wanted to reform. He admittedly failed to maintain verisimilitude in the experiment, but, intentionally or not, he pointed out some preexisting flaws in the experiment as well. The results of this study were meant to reflect society as a whole but the subjects were “carefully tested, psychologically solid, upper-middle-class Caucasian” Stanford students.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted in 1971 by researcher, Philip Zimbardo is one of the most eye-opening social studies done to this day. It’s purpose was to find out more about how the social principles of obedience and conformity can affect the behavior of a normal human being. Zimbardo wanted to discover how social customs and hierarchy affect the roles people play, in a prison setting (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866). Though their purpose seems praiseworthy, the experiment itself was not. It was filled with ethical violations and in just 6 days, spun out of control (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This experiment went wrong and led to mental problems. These problems became so extreme that the experiment was discontinued after 6 days instead of 2 weeks. The Stanford Prison Experiment called into question the idea of Good vs Evil. The experiment showed how situational journey can cause an individual to “compromise” their beliefs. This change in behavior lead to psychological conflict among the “guards” and “prisoners.”…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Phillip Zimbardo (1972) gave us notable understandings into human behaviour, even though considered an unethical study. In the scandalous experiment, a group of participants completed a study in a mock prison environment. Some of the participants took on the role of prisoner, and others acted as the guards. The guards behaved in an inhumane and demeaning way towards the participants acting as prisoners. They were not given full details e.g. on what to expect and how to behave.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays