Battle Of Salamis Summary

Improved Essays
The Battle of Salamis provides an informative and intriguing account of the battle of Salamis in 480 B.C. Barry Strauss is a professor of history and classics at Cornell University. He specializes in ancient warfare as well as naval warfare. His works have been published in a variety of academic journals as well as The Washington Post and Los Angeles Times. In this monograph, Strauss brings the battle to life and takes readers on a ride. His book is a adequate source for students, educators, and those who enjoy learning about ancient naval warfare. This monograph is categorized into four parts: The Advance, The Trap, The Battle, and The Retreat. These four parts are further broken down into thirteen chapters that further break down and explain …show more content…
Their major downfall was attempting to turn their boats around. Being that the Persian ships were too large to maneuver, they were unable to flee due to other persian ships blocking the path. By trying to turn around they crashed into their own ships. They were blocked from all sides with nowhere to go. In the end, the Greeks won. This was especially disheartening for the Persian army. Xerxes ordered the attack first. Also, this battle was very costly for Persia. They needed even more ships for supplies and to also transport troops. On the other hand, the Greeks were proud, not only did they trick the Persian army, which was proven a game-changing tactic, they were also triumphant over an army more than three times their size. Not only did Barry Strauss give a factual account of the battle of Salamis, he also provides an interesting narrative. When reading this monograph, it did not feel like reading a history book, but a novel that got even more interesting as the pages turned. The Battle of Salamis: The Naval Encounter that Saved Greece-and the Western Civilization provides an informative and intriguing account of the battle of Salamis in 480 B.C. This publication is an acceptable resource for students to learn and analyze the battle as well as the leaders, ships, and different tactics

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A main figure acting as an external force against all sides involved in the Wars, is Alcibiades. He influenced multiple people and was highly appreciated in numerous nations, giving him a wide berth for manipulation of important figures to cater to his own plans. Involved in the Peloponnesian conflict since the battle involving Potidaea, Alcibiades’ ideas were respected among influential persons; given the fact that he had been brought up by esteemed member of society, Socrates (Krentz, 2003). Showing his political strength in Athenian court, Alcibiades overruled current acting general Nicias’ logical judgements on proposed expeditions such as Sicily (where he outlined the fact that it would be a work of great difficulty), for his own personal gain…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Themistocles was born in Athens in 524 BCE. He was the son of Neocles a middle class Athenian and a non-Athenian concubine mother. He was a citizen of Cleisthenes which in 508 BCE which made all Athenians free men. This contributed to his democratic tendencies. Themistocles lived in Athens for his entire life but often traveled because he was part of the Athenian military.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They had fought for days and lost thousands of men but had not made any progress in their invasion. The Persian king brought out a prisoner (or it was a traitor who came on his own free will, the story is disputed) who was tortured and asked for information regarding the battle. The prisoner (or traitor) told the Persians about a small trail above Thermopylae that only the local farmers knew about. It would allow the Persians to sneak up on the Greeks from behind and corner them in the pass of Thermopylae. Sometime during the night, the Kings Guard (the Persian kings elite soldiers) followed the secret pass and ambushed the Greeks.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pickett's Charge

    • 1052 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the most skilled generals of the time showed weakness in decisions from poor preparation for the battle, lack of loyalty in his supporting leadership, poor grounds for launching assaults, and underestimation of his opponent. Coupled with the strong leadership exhibited by the Northern general, the outcome was certain. This battle alone shows that effective leadership is important, but the absence of leadership or the lack of proper judgement is equally as dramatic in its…

    • 1052 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Here I am very anxious to add certain details concerning these military undertakings, which are due to divine rather than human inspiration. This I do for the especial purpose of refuting those imprudent - or, better, impudent - critics. who, bound by prejudice, take it upon themselves with insolent lips to blame this novel enterprise, so necessary to a world that is growing old and nearing its end. They, like the Epicureans, prefer the broad way of pleasure to the narrow way of God's…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although his army was superior in number and in ships, they were defeated off the island of Salamis. The “narrow waters of the straits” left the Persian fleet exposed and vulnerable as “easy targets” for the Greeks (Hanes, 78). This battle was only the Greeks first victory, and the first of the few that propelled the Greeks towards a Persian-free future. Xerxes, anxious to view his army “deliver the final blow” of the war, set up a throne on Salamis to view his great victory (Knox, sec. Battle of Salamis).…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Salamis Research Paper

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Athenians had fled to Salamis after the Battle of Thermopylae in August, 480 BC, while the Persians occupied and burned their city. The Greek fleet joined them there in August after the indecisive Battle of Artemisium. The Spartans wanted to return to the Peloponnese, seal off the Isthmus of Corinth with a wall, and prevent the Persians from defeating them on land, but the Athenian commander Themistocles persuaded them to remain at Salamis, arguing that a wall across the Isthmus was pointless as long as the Persian army could be transported and supplied by the Persian navy. His argument depended on a particular interpretation of the oracle at Delphi, which, in typical Delphic ambiguity, prophesized that Salamis would "bring death to women's…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These ships would soon be put to the ultimate test when faced against their adversary, a huge Persian fleet of over 1000 ships. The location of this coming storm of ships and soldiers would meet at the infamous Salamis Bay for one of the biggest sea and land battles in history. Ancient Greek triremes outperformed Persians ships, which led to the victory at Salamis Bay because of their superior design, powerful weaponry, and the skilled seamanship of Athenian sailors. First, the Greeks and their triremes destroyed many enemy vessels and prevailed in the Battle of Salamis Bay because of their superior design.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stories and Histories Essay - Kyle Floyd The Spartans, led by Leonidas took a stand at Thermopylae. Leonidas led the Spartans against the Persians, who were led by King Xerxes. They were exceedingly valiant in battle. Although they were outnumbered, but they still fought for everything they believed in, their pride for Polis, their hate towards the Persians, the phalanx, and their thoughts towards death. Leonidas and the “300” confronted the Persians at Thermopylae even though it was impossible to stop their invasion of Greece, because of their pride for their Polis.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Themistocles was arguable one of the most significant political and military figures of Athens during the fifth century. He is often remembered for his emphasis on naval power and for his influence on the success of the Greeks during the Persian wars. However, more can be learned from studying Themistocles than war strategy and political conduct. In his work, Themistocles, Plutarch examines the role ambition plays throughout Themistocles’ life. His evaluation serves to highlight the boundaries and dangers of ambition, while emphasizing its double-sided nature.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He strengthened his flank and lured the Persians in, and then surrounded them and attacked their flanks. King Darius had 26,000 soldiers and the Greek’s had 9,000 soldiers, and they still were successful. After King Darius I his son Xerxes returned and defeated the Spartans at Thermopylae (480 B.C.). During 480 B.C. the Greeks won an important naval battle, and the following year the Spartans defeated the Persians at Plataea which ended the…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Greek strategy overcame the sheer size of the Persian Army; utilizing the terrain around them and their men, the Greeks experienced great success in places like Marathon, the Straits of Salamis, and Mycale. However, the Persian’s over reliance on the size of their forces and some crucial battlefield mistakes, like the order to assault at Plataea, greatly aided the Greeks in their…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The eleventh general was called the polemarch –or commander-in-chief- who voted on what to do with the army if the other ten couldn’t come to an agreement. Despite being heavily outnumbered the Greeks military strategy helped them win the decisive battle at…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Naval Academy, Craig Symonds has proven the historical reliability of his work by the use of many resources, not only previous literature, but also interviews and military records, among other sources. His ability to explain the “culture that informed” those who made decisions, from both the American and Japanese sides of the war paints of picture of individuality in those players within the battle. Symonds does not simply give a dry, monotonous retelling, his use of background information provides the reader with an appreciation of those men whose actions would direct the steps in this battle dance. From the snow-white head of the imposing and formidable Admiral Nimitz to the “baby-faced air commander,” Lieutenant Tomonaga Joichi who replaced a Commander Fuchida Mitsuo after he became ill with appendicitis. Meeting both the Commander in Chief and Chief of Naval Operations, the “abrasive” and “scandalous” Admiral Ernest J. King, within Symonds’ pages does much to set the mood for the reader of what the tone would have actually been like in his presence.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While studying the history of the archaic forces that fought in the Punic Wars, it is important to understand the rise of each side involved. The Punic Wars were fought between the powerhouses of the Western Mediterranean. On one side was the well established Carthaginians and on the other was the up and coming Romans. Both dominant city states would expand and eventually rise to conflict against each other. This essay will delve into the aspects that allowed Carthage to reign successful and come close to overpowering the great and mighty Rome.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays